Medical finance driving major changes in health care marketplace

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pain in their feet last summer led Brian and Emily Kahn into a little-known wrinkle in medical finance that has been driving big changes in the health care marketplace.

Brian was referred by his doctor to St. Vincent Physical Therapy Clinic, an office inside a two-story medical office building in Zionsville.

Emily was referred by her doctor to physical therapists at a facility run by Methodist Sports Medicine, an independently owned physician practice.

kahn_brian_mug.jpg Brian Kahn

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield reimbursed Methodist Sports Medicine $91.13 per visit for Emily’s treatment. Anthem told Emily to pay a $40 per-visit co-pay.

But Anthem reimbursed St. Vincent $181.92 per visit for Brian’s therapy, and required Brian to pay $176.42 per visit.

St. Vincent’s twofold higher charge was not disclosed to Brian Kahn by the hospital before he was asked to sign a document obligating him to pay it. And it was not

communicated accurately by Anthem, even though Kahn checked with his insurer before going in for therapy.

kahn_emily_mug.jpg Emily Kahn

“It’s fraudulent that they can be a hospital facility,” Kahn said of the St. Vincent physical therapy clinic. “It’s legal, but it’s fishy to me.”

In spite of numerous requests for St. Vincent to change its fee—including a complaint to the Attorney General’s Office—St. Vincent wouldn’t budge.

Now that more and more doctors and health care providers are employed by hospitals, more and more patients are feeling Brian Kahn’s pain.

And it’s not just in physical therapy. Private insurers like Anthem, Cigna Corp. and even the federal Medicare program pay hospital-owned physician practices as much as 10 times more for so-called ancillary services, such as imaging and blood tests.

For example, Indiana University Health Arnett Hospital in Lafayette charged Cigna $60.35 for a hemoglobin A1C test, according to 2012 data from Purdue University, which contracts with Cigna to secure discounted rates for its workers.

But for the exact same test conducted by independent lab companies, Cigna pays no more than $7.09.

For a urinalysis test at an IU Health Arnett facility, Cigna paid $17.85, according to Purdue. For the same test conducted by the lab companies, it paid no more than $2.32.

The extra amount hospitals can bill for ancillary services has been a financial boon to hospitals in Indianapolis and across the country as they have acquired large numbers of physician practices over the past five years.

The main reasons for those acquisitions have been to secure patient referrals that keep hospital beds and operating rooms full, and to help coordinate care for patients. But the higher payments for ancillary fees have been icing on the cake.

Some hospitals have even acquired only the ancillary-services part of physician practices, just to receive higher reimbursement, according to a report by VMG Health LLC, a Texas-based company that performs valuations of physician practices.

Pervasive practice

The practice has become so common now that the staff of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, a federal agency that advises Congress on the federal health insurance program for seniors, has generated six reports on the issue since November 2011.

The MedPAC staff has now identified $2.3 billion in annual spending by Medicare that could be cut by narrowing or equalizing payment rates between doctors and hospitals.

Here are the documents Brian and Emily Kahn exchanged with the Indiana Attorney General’s Office and St. Vincent Hospital and Health Service.

Original information and complaint to the Attorney General’s Office.

St. Vincent response to Kahn’s complaint to the Attorney General’s Office.

Collection notice.

“The result of services shifting to OPDs [outpatient departments] is higher program spending and beneficiary cost-sharing,” Ariel Winter, a principal policy analyst at MedPAC, said during a March 7 meeting of the commission. “Meanwhile, there may be no significant changes in patient care.”

MedPAC’s reports and recommendations are not binding on Congress, but with lawmakers on Capitol Hill looking for budget savings, the cuts stand a decent chance of becoming law.

If they do, it’s highly likely that private insurers like Anthem, a subsidiary of Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., will try to follow suit.

Already, Anthem tries to steer patients to physician-owned imaging facilities because the bills there—for both Anthem and its customers—are so much lower. And hospital representatives say the insurer has been cracking down on the high charges for ancillary services.

Anthem declined to respond to questions for this story.

Hospital groups are already pushing back against the proposed changes by Medicare.

“The cuts continue to hammer the same types of hospitals over and over—teaching hospitals, safety-net hospitals, the public hospitals and rural hospitals,” said Joanna Kim, vice president of payment policy at the American Hospital Association, after MedPAC discussed its latest round of proposed cuts to ancillary fees, on March 7.

The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act called for $155 billion in cuts to hospital reimbursement. Then the fiscal-cliff deal on Jan. 1 this year chopped out another $15 billion. And the budget sequester, which hit March 1, looked ready to sap another $10 billion.

But doctors’ groups feel like the problem is something Medicare and private health insurers have brought on themselves.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that runs the Medicare program, was especially eager to curb doctors’ use of their own imaging and lab facilities. In 2008, it issued a rule that chopped reimbursement to physicians, especially on ancillary services.

In response, physicians started selling their practices to hospitals with abandon. From 2003 to 2011, the portion of physicians employed by hospitals rose 55 percent, according to a MedPac analysis of survey data from the American Hospital Association.

In Indianapolis, Indiana University Health has built up a physician practice with more than 1,000 doctors. St. Vincent Health employs nearly 800 and Community Health Network employs roughly 600.

When hospitals employ doctors, the doctors are exempt from federal laws that prevent patient referrals to health care facilities in which the physicians have a financial interest.

And local hospitals have structured contracts with those newly employed physicians that penalize them for making too many referrals outside their hospital network.

All of that makes it more likely that patients’ doctors will refer them for diagnostic and ancillary services at facilities owned by their hospital employer. And those facilities can bill at the higher hospital rates.

Rude surprise

Brian Kahn knew nothing about these trends in health care when his podiatrist referred him for physical therapy in September 2012.

But as a trained lawyer and manager of the Floors to Your Home flooring store in Indianapolis, he knew he should get a clear price quote before agreeing to pay it.

He was soon to find that getting a clear price in health care is nearly impossible.

Before Kahn ever made a visit to the St. Vincent Physical Therapy Clinic at 10801 N. Michigan Road, he phoned Anthem and asked what the therapy would cost.

He was told it would cost $40 per visit. And that seemed right, because that’s what Kahn had paid for physical therapy on his shoulder just a year before. And that’s the same amount his wife had been charged when she received therapy on her foot one month before Brian Kahn went in for therapy.

But that information ended up being wrong, because the St. Vincent clinic bills as a hospital and not as an office practice.

What that means is that St. Vincent bills for two payments from Anthem—first, for the actual work done by its therapists, and, second, for the use of its “hospital facility”—even though that facility is no different from a medical office and is nowhere near a hospital campus.

Independent physicians get to bill for just their services, not for the use of any facility.

On a form that Kahn later signed, the St. Vincent staff verified the $40 fee for physical therapy in an office.

But lower down on the form, it declares, “We bill through St. Vincent as a HOSPITAL FACILITY (not as an office visit).”

That form was sufficient disclosure, according to Chad Wilson, an attorney who represents St. Vincent. In a response to Kahn’s later complaint to the Attorney General’s Office, Wilson said the St. Vincent Physical Therapy Clinic made it clear that it billed as a hospital facility.

“The clinic goes to great lengths to notify patients that services provided in the clinic are outpatient hospital services,” Wilson wrote, citing the bills and signage at the St. Vincent Physical Therapy Clinic.

St. Vincent spokesman Johnny Smith declined to comment on Kahn’s complaint.

Kahn acknowledges that St. Vincent’s actions are legal. The Medicare program and the Indiana State Department of Health allow hospitals to label any of their facilities “hospital facilities” as long as they are within a 35-mile radius of an actual hospital.

What Kahn objects to is St. Vincent’s “misrepresentation” of itself—and what he describes as terrible customer service in response.

He said he made six calls to St. Vincent’s customer service department without receiving any return call.

After he complained to the Attorney General’s Office, a customer service manager named Liz Salas forwarded Wilson’s response to Kahn. But on the same day, Feb. 27, St. Vincent’s collection department referred Kahn’s account to a collection agency.

“We believe that we have given you every chance to pay this account and at this point in time you leave us with no other alternatives,” the collection department notice stated.

After that, Kahn paid his $1,234.96 bill for his seven physical therapy sessions. But he said he will try to avoid ever setting foot in a St. Vincent facility again.

“If I’m having a heart attack on West 86th Street, I’ll go to St. Vincent,” Kahn said. “But otherwise, I will never, ever again deal with St. Vincent.”•


  • bait and switch by Dr's and Hospitals, Facilities
    This has happened to our family 4 or more times and has cost many thousands of dollars. From the Dr's side, they work at multiple facilities, if they are under a persons health plan, the bills will be payed. Here is where it becomes a bait and switch operation, appointments are scheduled for the convenience and location of the physician, which may or may not be covered in the ancillary bills from that location. They never mention this and say yes, your insurance will cover it, when in fact, it won't. Realistically, the front office people, the Doctor, the hospitals don't care about the financial interest of the patient, they know they will get payed no matter what. However, I believe it is part of their responsibility to assist the patient in being assured the insurance will pay for most if not all of the Dr's bills including facility, etc. Customer service and customer care need to be much higher than what they are now or perhaps the patient should shop around and take the business to the Physicians who care about patient wellness holistically including insurance coverage to the fullest. In other words, since the hospitals don't care, the Dr's don't care, the patient needs to take this into their own hands and get full investigational pre-approval, pre-qualification, and pre-costing of what it might cost them out of pocket, making this a more competitive market and taking away the unknowns of the hospital and DR's vague billing system. An appendectimy should be standard cost across the nation. No matter level of medical care, any standard surgeries should be same cost, cafeteria plan across the country. Every item used should be amortized and folded into patient care and should not have $100 aspirin nor multithousand dollar bills to monitor diabetes for instance.
  • But what you don't know...
    I manage outpatient therapies for a community based not for profit hospital. I can tell you that many times we perform services for free to patients who have no insurance. But we are mandated to see them because of EMTALA rules and because a community based hospital cannot turn away a patient from the ER regardless of ability to pay. So often the uninsured use the ER as a clinic and the hospital eats the cost. In addition, reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid barely cover therapist wages much less the wages for support staff, supplies, and yes – liability insurance. (Hospitals do pay therapists less than private clinics do.) Yes, it's a tangled mess and I believe patients should know how much their therapy will cost. As a system, we do the best we can to estimate costs and to educate the patient of other important elements in their decision making. First that our physicians are bothered by the private therapy clinics who more often ask for continuation orders to keep patients coming to therapy costing extra dollars. Some patients have yearly visit limitations and this causes them to perhaps be used unnecessarily. Secondly, our therapists who had practiced in the private clinics left that setting to join the hospital because they were required to share their patients with non-licensed rehab aides who were being utilized to perform treatments that are reimbursable only when performed by a skilled licensed professional. They complained they had 3-4 patients scheduled in one hour and were required to bill for the entire hour for those patients after only spending 15-20 minutes with them. That's fraudulent as well. Hospital outpatient therapy is typically performed for 45 minutes to an hour one to one patient – therapist ratio for the best patient outcome allowing for discharge in fewer visits reducing cost to the patient. Hospital will be required to publish selected chargemaster procedures on insurance websites so patients can compare but for hospitals, the chargemaster cost does not include insurance negotiated discounts, which the patient realizes when they receive the bill. Co-pays are not collected until therapy is over. Visa and Mastercard are not billed at the initial visit and the patient is holding onto their cash for a longer period. Again, insurance reimbursement is at a negotiated discounted rate, which the patient also realizes as their co-insurance. I can't speak for all hospitals, but that's how our community based system works.
  • Typical
    Nice expose' on the "greatest medical care system in the world", which of course means the best legal and accounting talent to make these hospital systems the most profitable "non-profits" in the world.
  • Same problem/hancock regional
    I'm having the same problem right now with Hancock Regional. Had I known about their crappy billing policies, I never would have set foot in their facility. I was invoiced $350 for a "room fee" for an appointment that lasted a total of 14 minutes. 11 phone calls later, it was finally disclosed to me that the invoice was for a room charge. I've been sent to collections.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.