IBJOpinion

MERHOFF: Regionalism according to Yoda

Mo Merhoff
September 4, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mo MerhoffAnita DeFrantz, Indianapolis native, Olympian and member of the International Olympic Committee, was speaking to a national women’s convention several years ago. She followed a series of speakers, all of whom were railing against the ongoing lack of equal opportunities for women in sports organizations, and all of whom detailed how they were “trying” to change things.

In an opening line I’ll never forget, she quoted Yoda’s response to Luke Skywalker in “Star Wars”: “Do, or do not. There is no try.”

Like most regions throughout the country, central Indiana has been trying for years to plan and act regionally, following the success stories of the Charlottes, Denvers and Louisvilles of the world. It isn’t easy.

For one, there’s our natural bias for what we see as ours, and what’s “ours” is pretty close by. If a neighboring community has a problem that doesn’t directly affect us, then it’s their issue. We tout our own community’s success stories and deride others’. If the amenity isn’t in our city, then it’s foolish, ill-conceived or at least in the wrong place. We draw mental lines between cities when real barriers no longer exist.

Second, we presume a hierarchy exists, when a collaborative leadership network is the goal. Recently, Roland Dorson, president of the Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, convened a regional group to hear a review of central Indiana’s water supply, and discuss how collectively we might manage its future. The group’s intentions were challenged by several as “just another attempt to force surrounding communities to pay for an Indianapolis issue.” As evidenced by the huge challenges facing several Southwestern states, our water supply is everybody’s issue and our ability to collectively ensure it is essential to any successful economic development anywhere in central Indiana.

Third, like most people everywhere, we tend to work together only when things reach a crisis level. We’ll collaborate on a plan to leave the platform only after it’s already on fire.

In today’s connected world, none of these impediments to regional thinking makes any sense. Ted Abernathy, executive director of the Southern Growth Policies Board, spoke recently at the American Chamber of Commerce Executives convention to a large, national audience of chamber leaders hungry for advice on how to create successful collaboration and regionalism. The fact that areas acting regionally are winning the economic development game is not lost on chamber executives.

According to Abernathy, 2.8 billion people are now connected worldwide on handheld devices. That’s 40 percent of the world’s population. Additionally, Abernathy estimates that, by 2020, 80 percent of middle-income consumers in the world will live outside “developed” countries.

The subtitle of “Globality,” a popular book on international competitiveness, is “Competing with Everyone from Everywhere on Everything.”

So how can we in central Indiana compete? According to the authors of “Globality”—and many others—we can build competitive regional clusters that provide what matters to businesses. An educated, affordable labor force. Dependable infrastructure. Quality-of-life amenities that appeal to today’s employees and tomorrow’s.

It takes leadership, vision and a commitment to move forward with the belief that each of our individual community’s futures is truly dependent on another’s. According to the 2010 Council on Competitiveness, the true test of regionalism is whether a region can act effectively together, not just in a crisis, but on an ongoing basis.

John F. Kennedy once said, “Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.” The issues that face our region, and threaten our ability to compete—transit, education, water resources and infrastructure, among others—are easy only if we choose to see those issues as someone else’s problem. Abernathy described collaboration as “an unnatural act between unconsenting adults.” Maybe our discomfort is our knowledge that collaboration really is the answer.

There’s little doubt we’ve tried. The myriad studies and task forces over the past 20 years attest to that. Perhaps the time for trying is over. Maybe Yoda was right.•

__________

Merhoff is president of the Carmel Chamber of Commerce.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT