IBJOpinion

MERHOFF: Regionalism according to Yoda

Mo Merhoff
September 4, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mo MerhoffAnita DeFrantz, Indianapolis native, Olympian and member of the International Olympic Committee, was speaking to a national women’s convention several years ago. She followed a series of speakers, all of whom were railing against the ongoing lack of equal opportunities for women in sports organizations, and all of whom detailed how they were “trying” to change things.

In an opening line I’ll never forget, she quoted Yoda’s response to Luke Skywalker in “Star Wars”: “Do, or do not. There is no try.”

Like most regions throughout the country, central Indiana has been trying for years to plan and act regionally, following the success stories of the Charlottes, Denvers and Louisvilles of the world. It isn’t easy.

For one, there’s our natural bias for what we see as ours, and what’s “ours” is pretty close by. If a neighboring community has a problem that doesn’t directly affect us, then it’s their issue. We tout our own community’s success stories and deride others’. If the amenity isn’t in our city, then it’s foolish, ill-conceived or at least in the wrong place. We draw mental lines between cities when real barriers no longer exist.

Second, we presume a hierarchy exists, when a collaborative leadership network is the goal. Recently, Roland Dorson, president of the Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, convened a regional group to hear a review of central Indiana’s water supply, and discuss how collectively we might manage its future. The group’s intentions were challenged by several as “just another attempt to force surrounding communities to pay for an Indianapolis issue.” As evidenced by the huge challenges facing several Southwestern states, our water supply is everybody’s issue and our ability to collectively ensure it is essential to any successful economic development anywhere in central Indiana.

Third, like most people everywhere, we tend to work together only when things reach a crisis level. We’ll collaborate on a plan to leave the platform only after it’s already on fire.

In today’s connected world, none of these impediments to regional thinking makes any sense. Ted Abernathy, executive director of the Southern Growth Policies Board, spoke recently at the American Chamber of Commerce Executives convention to a large, national audience of chamber leaders hungry for advice on how to create successful collaboration and regionalism. The fact that areas acting regionally are winning the economic development game is not lost on chamber executives.

According to Abernathy, 2.8 billion people are now connected worldwide on handheld devices. That’s 40 percent of the world’s population. Additionally, Abernathy estimates that, by 2020, 80 percent of middle-income consumers in the world will live outside “developed” countries.

The subtitle of “Globality,” a popular book on international competitiveness, is “Competing with Everyone from Everywhere on Everything.”

So how can we in central Indiana compete? According to the authors of “Globality”—and many others—we can build competitive regional clusters that provide what matters to businesses. An educated, affordable labor force. Dependable infrastructure. Quality-of-life amenities that appeal to today’s employees and tomorrow’s.

It takes leadership, vision and a commitment to move forward with the belief that each of our individual community’s futures is truly dependent on another’s. According to the 2010 Council on Competitiveness, the true test of regionalism is whether a region can act effectively together, not just in a crisis, but on an ongoing basis.

John F. Kennedy once said, “Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.” The issues that face our region, and threaten our ability to compete—transit, education, water resources and infrastructure, among others—are easy only if we choose to see those issues as someone else’s problem. Abernathy described collaboration as “an unnatural act between unconsenting adults.” Maybe our discomfort is our knowledge that collaboration really is the answer.

There’s little doubt we’ve tried. The myriad studies and task forces over the past 20 years attest to that. Perhaps the time for trying is over. Maybe Yoda was right.•

__________

Merhoff is president of the Carmel Chamber of Commerce.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.

ADVERTISEMENT