MORRIS: A 'no new programs' effort to help kids

Greg Morris
May 7, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

MorrisIt has been well documented that Indiana legislators made history this session by passing the most comprehensive education reform legislation in the country. Every component of Gov. Mitch Daniels’ education agenda was passed and has either been signed or awaits the governor’s signature.

While there was sharp disagreement over how to “put students first,” we all need to reconcile our differences and be advocates for the success of our children.

What’s not as well publicized as the legislative reforms is a companion effort, the Central Indiana Talent Alliance, which is on the front lines of improving education. The executive committee of the Talent Alliance is chaired by IUPUI Chancellor Charles Bantz, who has surrounded himself with a who’s who of business, education, foundation and not-for-profit community leaders.

Before I get into the specifics, here’s the part that really caught my attention: The Talent Alliance has no desire to create new educational programs. Alliance members don’t want to duplicate or displace the work of other community organizations. They simply want to mobilize and align existing efforts in a way that adds value. No new programs? That’s when I knew they were really on to something,

By examining the effectiveness of various programs, tracking the progress of the city’s children, and directing resources to what works, the Talent Alliance intends to influence the “cradle-to-career” success of our younger population. Cradle-to-career is defined as preschool through baccalaureate degree. Benchmarks have been established and a baseline report issued for 2010. A progress report will be issued annually.

The goal is nothing less than seeing that every student in the region is prepared for school, engaged meaningfully in and out of school, and supported to succeed academically on the way to postsecondary education and a career.

The Talent Alliance breaks the challenge into specific phases of a child’s development.

Birth to second grade is the time to prepare children for school. Too many children in Marion County lack access to high-quality early childhood education. The goal is to increase the number of low-income children who attend a high-quality early childhood program in order to improve school readiness and reduce inequities in opportunities for success.

The critical time to ensure academic success is in grades 3 through 8. Too many children in central Indiana are not proficient in mathematics and language arts. The goal is to increase the percentage of students passing ISTEP+ in these areas at the third- and eighth-grade levels.

At all ages, children need support outside of school, but central Indiana lacks a sufficient number of high-quality, accessible and affordable out-of-school programs. The goal is to increase access to positive out-of-school experiences that support social, academic, personal, physical and emotional development.

The critical time to support students to enroll in postsecondary education is during grades 9-12. Currently, too few students take the challenging courses needed to prepare for college and too many students exit high school before earning a diploma. The goal is to increase the percentage of high school graduates who earn a Core 40 or academic honors diploma and increase the percentage of students graduating from high school in four years.

In the postsecondary years, there must be support for students to graduate and enter a career. As of 2008, only 34.9 percent of residents age 25 and over in Marion County held college degrees. The figure is 63.6 percent in Hamilton County. The goal is to increase this percentage in all central Indiana counties.

I encourage everyone to learn more about this important collaborative effort. You will find more information and the complete 2010 Community Baseline Report at www.talentalliance.iupui.edu.

Don’t we all want every child in the region to have an equal chance for success in school and a resulting successful life? Over time, this can be achieved. Let’s all work together to make it happen. The conversation will continue.•


Morris is publisher of IBJ. His column appears every other week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to gmorris@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing