MORRIS: Daniels succeeds the right way

Greg Morris
January 14, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

MorrisAs I watched Gov. Daniels’ final State of the State speech last week, I was reminded just how lucky we’ve been to have his leadership the past seven years. He still has a year to go, and you can take him at his word there won’t be any loafing. He delivered his message with grace and class and he didn’t succumb to the disrespect shown by many Democrats who didn’t attend his speech and union protestors trying to shout him down outside the chamber.

When the speech was over, most Democrats who did attend were seen bolting out the door quickly. But, I’ll give them credit for at least showing up. Those who stayed to give comments were predictably critical of the content and a few endorsed the disruptive behavior of the union protesters. Showing disrespect, obstructing the ability to conduct business, and general bad behavior are business as usual by many House Democrats.

With such behavior, obviously not everyone believes the governor has been a great leader, but the facts speak for themselves. Indiana is much better off today than in 2004, and this was accomplished against a backdrop of the worst economy in 80 years. Daniels delivered on his initial promise that things would be different. And in this case, different is better. Given the economy, his accomplishments are especially amazing. But, he’s made a lot of enemies to get here, and my guess is he’s OK with that. He tried the collaborative approach at first, but when you’ve been stonewalled over and over again, you have to take a different approach.

Indiana has a strong fiscal policy and financial stability today, unlike most states. We have an economic environment conducive to attracting new businesses and fostering the success of all businesses. We now have true education reform that mandates accountability from schools and teachers, along with policies in place designed to produce positive results for our kids. Education reform has been a nasty fight, but Daniels and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Dr. Tony Bennett were a formidable team in pressing for reform. State government is much leaner today, yet services are delivered more efficiently.

In the past, it’s been well-known if you wanted to get re-elected in Indiana, you’d better not try to force too much change. Don’t disturb the status quo. I hope those days are gone forever, but our newly elected governor, whoever that is, will need to pick up that ball and run with it out of the gate.

Speaking of picking up the ball, the analogy of taking your ball and going home with it comes to mind as we’ve watched the beginning of another year of antics by House Democrats. For goodness sake—make your case, show up for work, and vote your conscience with an up or down vote. Where did this idea come from that if things don’t go your way as the minority, you obstruct business by not showing up to work? It’s unprofessional. How can these folks expect to be taken seriously on anything after acting like that? Problems like this are easily taken care of in the real world. You get fired.

The flight to Illinois last year, combined with the no-shows this year, is nothing short of embarrassing. In fact, I find it indefensible and infuriating. I talked about disrespect earlier, so I’m going to temper my comments here. To the voters of District 6 in South Bend—please consider making a change next election. It’s time to thank the Democratic leader of the Indiana House, Patrick Bauer, for his years of service and reward him with an appropriate retirement party.

At press time, it does appear there is now a deal to allow more time to prepare amendments to the right-to-work bill, which should lead to a vote soon. We should all be pleased the terms and conditions have been met to encourage folks to show up to work again and do their job. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

Governor—I applaud your tireless fight against the status quo these past seven years. Indiana is a better place because of your service. And I look forward to more accomplishments in your final year.•


Morris is publisher of IBJ. His column appears every other week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to gmorris@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.