IBJOpinion

MORRIS: Setting an example we hope Washington will follow

Greg Morris
December 1, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

MorrisI’ve been knee deep in budget meetings, one after another, for what seems like an eternity now. It’s been only about a month, but it seems much longer. I’ve talked to many business colleagues who have been doing the same. The process can be an emotional roller coaster in any year, but with the painfully slow economic recovery stalling substantive growth, many companies have had to make increasingly tough decisions.

Really, it’s pretty simple math. When revenue isn’t projected to increase fast enough, logically, the only remaining option is to take a laser-sharp look at where you can cut (again). The problem with that strategy is, if you’ve been faced with mainly cutting expenses, rather than projecting strong revenue growth the past several years, the choices get a lot more painful. Big compromises have to be made and you have to determine what you can live with.

I’m finally down to the last remaining issues, none of which will be easy to achieve a consensus on. In fact, consensus might not be achievable on all issues, but decisions will need to be made, anyway. Budgeting has always been challenging, but most executives I talk with agree the job seems to get tougher every year.

Yet we all do what needs to be done. We complete the process and we end up with a projected budget for the year. We perform our due diligence and make the tough decisions based on what we believe puts the company in the best position to succeed and produce the greatest return for shareholders. Decisions are based on projected market conditions for the upcoming year, and we stand at the ready to make adjustments quickly as the year progresses and actual conditions change.

Most of us do the same with our personal and family budgets at home. It’s all about monthly projected income versus expenses. Maybe we don’t have all the spreadsheets a business needs, but we try to work within a budget so there’s at least enough money to pay all the bills and, we hope, have a little left over to devote to savings now and then. Again, it’s pretty simple math. You didn’t have to really comprehend or retain any advanced mathematics from your school days to understand that, when there isn’t enough cash coming in, you have to figure out how to cut expenses.

I’ll finish up my company budget soon, and as a result of an exhaustive process, I’ll be a better manager for having gone through every line item. I will have refreshed my understanding of where every dollar is going and why it was spent. It feels good to have a fresh plan.

All right, you might know where I’m headed now. I’ll give you a clue. I’m getting ready to jump on a plane bound for Alexandria, Va., for a board meeting with a national trade group I’m associated with. I’m going to be within a stone’s throw of Washington, D.C., for three days. I’ve been talking about responsible budgeting.

In other words, who’s looking out for the best interests of the citizens of our country? We haven’t had a national budget for 3-1/2 years. Every minute of every day of the year, our government spends an obscene amount of money it doesn’t have—and there’s no end in sight. It’s criminal. If you or I did that, we’d be on the run—or in jail.

Our leaders haven’t been able to make any tough decisions or reach any compromises that are necessary to break the logjam. Honestly, it disgusts me. And there’s a negative effect that quickly hits home. I can’t get my business moving in the right direction until they get off their butts and actually do something that gives us some confidence in the future.

I was on a conference call last week with a colleague from the East Coast whom I’ll be seeing at my upcoming meeting in Alexandria. I happen to know this individual has a different political party affiliation than I do. We were discussing this topic and as I was expressing my frustration and disgust, I stated that my feelings were 100 percent nonpartisan. I have equal disdain for all obstructionists. Interestingly, even though my friend comes from a different political persuasion, he said he couldn’t agree more.

We agreed to consider making a side trip into the capital to see if we could talk some sense into these folks. I’ll let you know how we do.•

__________

Morris is publisher of IBJ. His column appears every other week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to gmorris@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT