MORRIS: Tough love for public education

Greg Morris
February 12, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

MorrisEducation is on my mind this week. There’s been a lot of talk and positioning about education reform, and now it’s game on.

This past week, the Indiana House voted 59-37 in favor of House Bill 1002, chiefly authored by House Speaker Brian Bosma. The bill expands education opportunities for Indiana students by eliminating existing statutory caps on the number of charter schools allowed and by more broadly defining the types of entities that can serve as a sponsor of a charter school.

Other goals of the bill are aimed at increasing access to funding for charter schools, making sure charter schools are held to the state’s public schools accountability standards, and requiring a consistent transfer of credits when a student goes from a charter school to a traditional public school.

Gov. Daniels dedicated about half of his State of the State address in January to his education reform agenda. And we’re just getting started. House Bill 1002 is primarily focused on creating more options for students, but it is just the first step in an aggressive agenda of reforms that are designed to put children first.

Not everyone agrees more charter schools or other proposed reforms are a good idea. Did you see the raucous scene at the Statehouse last week? More than 1,000 teachers came from across the state to rally and voice their objections to Daniels’ education reforms and the specifics of the House bill, which they fear will drain resources from traditional public schools.

Daniels and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Dr. Tony Bennett are often demonized because they are forcing change in an attempt to fix a failing system. Isn’t that the way it always is? A system is failing, and everyone says they want to improve it. But, when significant change is finally proposed, all the individual and special interests scramble to fight it. Nothing happens and the cycle repeats itself.

When HB 1002 passed the House Education Committee back in January, Bennett praised the first step and said, “I am confident Indiana’s legislators will continue to work together to act now for Indiana’s students.” How did that working together work out in the House last week? The politically correct press releases say the bill passed the House with bipartisan support. That is technically true. But the yes votes were cast by 58 Republicans and one Democrat. It’s great to see that spirit of cooperation at work again. It warms the heart on these cold winter days. I guess there is still time for the Senate to work together.

Change does not come easily. Education reform is a topic that brings out passion—and rightfully so. Our children are our future. It’s tough to take the lead and criticize some teachers, administrators and school systems when there are good things happening in many schools. But the numbers don’t lie. Indiana students as a group have been underperforming and schools as a group have been failing.

Yet, there are excellent school systems that consistently perform at a high level. These high performers don’t like a lot of the reforms because they want to be granted more local control and take their game to an even higher level. They don’t want to be saddled with state mandates they say will hinder the success they are already achieving. Yet, those voices have to be careful their message does not blend in with the underperformers who are loudly complaining to protect their own self-interest. It’s a complicated issue.

Everyone would like to see more consensus on what changes are needed. However, it has been obvious for a long time that consensus is not at hand. The change we need has to be forced. We’re witnessing the state’s CEO force change. That doesn’t make him popular with many, but I applaud the effort.

Finally, the business community has to be a catalyst for positive change in education. Businesses need educated individuals and outstanding schools in their community and educational institutions need the support of the business community. To survive and prosper, this relationship is critical. I encourage you to be engaged in the conversation and in doing what you can to help facilitate the best outcomes.•


Morris is publisher of IBJ. His column appears every other week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to gmorris@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1