IBJNews

NCAA asks court to toss suit over Sandusky fine

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The National Collegiate Athletic Association asked a federal judge to throw out a Pennsylvania lawsuit challenging penalties imposed on Pennsylvania State University over the Jerry Sandusky child-abuse case.

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett has no standing to bring the case and is seeking to undo an agreement “freely entered into” by Penn State, the Indianapolis-based NCAA said in a filing Thursday in federal court in Harrisburg, Pa.

“This lawsuit is an inappropriate attempt to drag the federal courts into an intra-state political dispute,” the NCAA said in the filing.

Corbett sued the NCAA last month challenging a $60 million fine levied against the school for its failure to prevent the sexual abuse by Sandusky, a former assistant football coach who was convicted of molesting 10 boys. The complaint accused the NCAA of using the Sandusky offenses as a “pretext” to impose unprecedented sanctions, which violates antitrust laws.

Pennsylvania law gives Penn State the authority to manage its own athletics program, voluntarily join the NCAA and agree to contracts, the NCAA said in its filing. Corbett, a member of the Penn State governing board that approved the NCAA agreement, is seeking to “usurp the discretion that the legislature delegated to PSU,” the NCAA said.

“The remedial measures that Penn State agreed to were controversial, and have elicited strong feelings on all sides,” the NCAA said. “Some think they are too harsh, and some think they are too lenient. But none of those feelings have anything to do with the antitrust laws.”

In addition to the fine, the Indianapolis-based NCAA, the governing body for college sports, stripped Penn State of 112 football wins from 1998 through 2011 and barred the Nittany Lions from bowl games for four years, matching the longest post- season ban in NCAA history.

Pennsylvania will seek an injunction against all of the sanctions, James Schultz, Pennsylvania’s general counsel, said last month.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Great word
    Bloviating...fantastic word.
  • anticipation
    Can't wait to get that bloviating hypocrite, Emmert, under oath in the discovery process! Going to be a lot of 'uh' , 'but' and 'I don't know' going on! P.S How is that Miami deal working out? :)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT