IBJNews

NCAA faces firestorm after replacing Shaheen

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The NCAA has endured a public flogging for two days since it announced that it would replace Greg Shaheen as its chief of championship events, which includes the just-ended March Madness basketball tournaments.

Since Tuesday, fans and prominent journalists have fired off more than 150 messages on Twitter either blasting the Indianapolis-based NCAA or praising Shaheen, who had overseen all 89 of the NCAA’s championships—on an interim basis—since August 2010.

Greg ShaheenGreg Shaheen

But Shaheen had run the NCAA biggest show, the men’s basketball tournament, for more than a decade—including negotiating the mammoth $11 billion TV contract for the tournament with CBS and Turner Broadcasting.

Broadcasters Billy Packer and Dick Vitale called the NCAA’s decision “sad” and a “bad move” in Twitter messages. Duke University Coach Mike Krzyzewski told CBSSports.com that Shaheen’s removal is a “huge loss for our game.” And reporters for CBS and ESPN—the two main broadcasters of NCAA championship events—tweeted that the decision was “puzzling,” idiotic,” and a “damn shame.”

Replacing Shaheen will be Mark Lewis, a former sponsorship executive for NBC and the U.S. Olympic Committee, who most recently was president of New Jersey-based sports hospitality firm Jet Set Sports.

It’s not clear if Shaheen will remain with the NCAA. In a statement issued Tuesday by the NCAA, Lewis said, “Greg and I will be meeting over the next several days to discuss his role with the NCAA moving forward.”

The NCAA made no further comments about Shaheen. And Shaheen has declined to be interviewed about the change. He has, however, made comments supportive of the NCAA on Twitter.

“The NCAA's where I dreamed of working all my life. Here's to dreams realized, true friends and progress made enroute,” Shaheen tweeted on Tuesday. He said he would “be here tomorrow,” and added, “Mark Lewis inherits good people w/ innovative focus, 89 championships ready to roll. I'm excited to see the evolution continue!”

Shaheen, 44, is a Carmel native and Indiana University graduate. He was executive director of the Indiana Sports Corp. in the late 1990s before joining the NCAA in 2000, helping the organization move its headquarters from Kansas to Indianapolis.

The NCAA had to know the criticism was coming. It posted Shaheen’s job publicly in December. And while Shaheen was a candidate, some prominent NCAA coaches said they were mystified why he wasn’t a slam-dunk hire for the permanent position.

In a March 31 story in The New York Times, University of Kansas men’s basketball coach Bill Self said he was “shocked” at the possibility of Shaheen not returning. Michigan State University coach Tom Izzo said it “blows me away” that the NCAA was considering anyone but Shaheen to hold his job permanently.

“It’s hard for me to understand anything anymore except that everyone wants their own power,” Izzo told the newspaper.

Since the announcement of Lewis’ hiring, the criticism from sportswriters has been even harsher.

“But this is just further proof of how out of touch the people who work in the ivory towers in Indy are,” ESPN reporter Dana O’Neil wrote in a blog post. “The NCAA runs more like the KGB than an organization of and for its membership.”

O’Neil posted similar sentiments on Twitter, which were seconded by Vitale, a longtime ESPN sportscaster. “@gashaheen was passionate & devoted to March Madness - bad move by Emmett & his boys,” Vitale tweeted, referring to NCAA President Mark Emmert.

Many of the comments also showed a deep cynicism toward the NCAA.

“Thought @gashaheen was the best executive the NCAA had, so of course they're replacing him,” wrote CNBC sports business reporter Darren Rovell on Twitter, referring to Shaheen by his Twitter handle, @gashaheen.

“@gashaheen is (was?) pretty much the best thing about NCAA brass. Now it removed him from running the tournament. Flatly, it seems idiotic,” wrote CBSSports.com blogger Matt Norlander.

Local sports journalists also expressed displeasure. Anthony Calhoun, the sports reporter for WISH-TV Channel 8 in Indianapolis, tweeted, “So disappointed in the NCAA decision to replace @gashaheen He did so much for college hoops and for the coaches.”

Calhoun’s thoughts were retweeted by Chris Denari, who announces Indiana Pacers and Indiana Fever games on TV, who added his own thoughts: “I've known Greg since before he was at NCAA. He was an Indy NCAA volunteer. A great asset for NCAA and Indy. Bad move.”

Even some non-sports figures weighed in. NPR News anchor Steve Inskeep, who went to Carmel High School with Shaheen, tweeted, “Sorry old friend @gashaheen is done running March Madness.”

Todd Huston, a local Republican running for the state Legislature, tweeted, “Love the national support for @gashaheen. Greg is a great guy from a great family who will continue doing amazing things.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The point was who is tweeting, not how many
    Please the article was about who supports Sheehan, not about trending...the number of followers you have on twitter is not representative that you are tweeting anything of worth or Bieber wouldn't have 3 million...the fact that numbers are the only thing that matters to "not even trending" is proof that tweeting means nothing at all...Shaheen did a great job...he will be missed.
  • Thanks
    Thanks for the insightful reporting of regurgitating twitter feeds...quality reporting.
  • 150 Tweets!
    Only a 150 Tweets? #noteventrending

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

  2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

  3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

  4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

  5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

ADVERTISEMENT