NCAA must face ticket lottery lawsuit, court rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The National Collegiate Athletic Association must face a lawsuit by consumers claiming the organization, which stages annual basketball and hockey championships, unlawfully profits from a ticket lottery.

A U.S. appeals court in Chicago today reversed a federal judge’s 2009 dismissal of the case, ruling that the consumers—residents of New York, Arizona and Oregon— adequately alleged that the lottery may violate Indiana law.

The Indianapolis-based organization sells tickets for its top-rank Division I college basketball and hockey championships by accepting applications for more tickets than are actually available. After selecting those who will get them, it retains a $6 to $10 “handling” fee for each entry, the appeals court said.

“Win or lose, the service fee was forfeited by all entrants and retained by the NCAA,” the court said in a 2-1 decision.

Retention of that money, coupled with the awarding to some participants a thing of greater value than its price—the ticket—may violate Indiana’s law barring any entity other than the state from running a lottery, the judges said.

The consumers are seeking national class-action, or group, status for anyone who has paid the lottery entry fee since May 1998, plus an award of compensatory and punitive damages.

Erik Christianson, a spokesman for the association, didn’t immediately reply to an e-mailed request for comment.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/