IBJNews

Neighborhood eyesore headed for demolition

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The abandoned buildings on a former lead-foundry site that have long been eyesores for residents of a west-side neighborhood will be demolished early next year.

The city is soliciting bids from companies to tear down four buildings on the 16-acre Avanti Development Corp. property on Harris Street, which is tucked in a residential area a few miles west of downtown Indianapolis. Proposals are due Tuesday.

The site housed lead-smelting and lead-oxide facilities for about a century, but those operations have been defunct for decades.

In the early 1990s, the Environmental Protection Agency deemed it a high-priority cleanup because of lead contamination levels that were among the worst in the state. The EPA removed acres of contaminated soil from the area but the buildings remained, inviting crime and posing a hazard to neighborhood children who wandered there.

“If I had to live across the street from that, I don’t think I could get out of bed and look at it every day,” said Leigh McCall, who lives four blocks away from the site and serves as president of the We Care Neighborhood Association, which represents homeowners in the area surrounding the site. “It’s depressing.”

City leaders decided to tackle the Avanti site—named for a firm that purchased the property after the foundry left—after tearing down other high-profile buildings earlier this year. Those included the Keystone Towers project near Keystone Avenue and Fall Creek Parkway and the former Winona Hospital on North Meridian Street.

“Avanti is now the number-one suspect for the top most-wanted demolitions,” said Reggie Walton, abandoned buildings administrator for the city’s Department of Metropolitan Development. “That’s always been that community’s biggest eyesore.”

The city hopes to fund most of the tear-down by salvaging steel from the building and selling it. Walton expects that could offset the cost by about $700,000. Demolitions of that scale typically cost about $1 million, but the exact figure depends on the bids. Leftover federal grant funding and money from the city's utilities sale will cover the difference.

It’s unclear exactly why the buildings were left on the site after the EPA cleanup. At the time, several firms that may have shared in responsibility for the contamination tangled over who should pay the cleanup costs. A handful ultimately agreed to pay the EPA for cleanup.

Crews removed contaminated soil from the ground near the buildings and yards in surrounding blocks, placed it on 6 acres of the site, and covered it with clay to seal off the contamination.

But at the time, local and federal agencies were less coordinated in their efforts to discuss next steps for redevelopment, such as building removal.

“One of the more distressing parts of it was that empty hulks of buildings were left lying idle,” said Chris Harrell, a former brownfields redevelopment director at the city who now runs his own consulting business. “Removing the buildings and the blight they represent is the first step in getting the site back to reuse.”

McCall, of the neighborhood association, said those buildings have become magnets for squatters and prostitutes, who conduct business in them.

Over the years, cars have been left inside. Fires have been set. And kids have meandered there to play—even setting up a basketball hoop in an area that may still carry lead contamination.

The buildings will be torn down to their foundations, Walton said, because it’s not clear whether contaminated ground lies beneath them.

So far, there are no concrete plans to redevelop the site, but Walton said the city has discussed turning the space into a park for the neighborhood. That would involve putting out a request for proposals seeking firms to redevelop the site.

Any reuse also would require additional soil and groundwater testing, Harrell said, and potentially extra cleanup costs, depending upon the level of remaining contamination.

“The [first] step is to get the blight removed,” Walton said. “It makes it difficult to see the site’s potential when you’re looking at the current problems.”

The city hopes to select the bidder in time to begin work the second week of January. The project is expected to take about 45 days to complete.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lead Dust
    I remember working at that site in the early 80's in a warehouse. One of my daily tasks was to sweep up lead dust that fell from the rafters.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT