IBJNews

Net metering bill short-circuited in legislature

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indiana has never been California when it comes to laws that encourage renewable-energy industries. Nor, for that matter, has it even kept pace with some neighboring states.

Even so, the failure of a measure in the Indiana General Assembly this month was a bit of a surprise to those who pushed for a so-called net metering law that would have allowed businesses, universities and other organizations generating their own power to receive a retail credit on their utility bills.
 

Kharbonda Kharbanda

The bill was modest in its scope and would have amounted to little more than a baby step to encourage small-scale deployment of solar, wind and other forms of generation.

Now, only homeowners and schools are entitled to such a credit and only for a small portion of their own generated electricity.

“There was significant progress in getting unanimous, bipartisan support of net metering legislation in both chambers’ committees,” said Jesse Kharbanda, executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council.

Net metering measures were offered by Rep. Ryan Dvorak, D-South Bend, and Eric Koch, R-Bedford.

Though the attempt failed in the Legislature, HEC and the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club said they plan to ask Gov. Mitch Daniels to direct the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to expand net metering provisions through the regulatory rule-making process, instead.

“In our view, the utilities derailed an opportunity for a compromise bill in the final days of negotiations between the House and Senate,” said Steve Francis, chairman of the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT