IBJNews

New AFL-CIO head aims to educate, mobilize locally

Associated Press
December 4, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state's labor movement needs to revitalize itself at the community level and get more labor-friendly candidates elected to office, the new president of the Indiana State AFL-CIO said Wednesday.

Brett Voorhies, president of the Central Indiana Labor Council since 2011 and a political coordinator for the United Steelworkers, was elected by delegates Tuesday during AFL-CIO's state convention in Terre Haute, defeating incumbent Nancy Guyott. He takes over a federation of 800 local unions with 300,000 members across Indiana.

Voorhies said after his election he wants to find new ways to strengthen the AFL-CIO and "grow the voice of working people across this state."

"Right now I feel we're stagnant, we're status quo," he told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. "There wasn't a whole lot being done as far as services to our members."

Voorhies said he was approached by others in the federation to run for president, but not necessarily out of dissatisfaction with Guyott, who in 2009 became the first woman elected state AFL-CIO president.

"She did a fabulous job doing policy and legislative work. We have to do a lot more than that," Voorhies said. Besides a strong presence in the statehouse, the AFL-CIO should be active in communities and in service work, he said, along with educating members and others on legislation affecting workers.

The AFL-CIO organized protests during the 2011 and 2012 legislative sessions in an unsuccessful effort to stop passage of a state "right-to-work" law that bans the collection of mandatory fees for union representation.

That defeat did not lead to his election, Voorhies said.

"It was an uphill battle from the start. The only thing I would have done different is I maybe would have started a little earlier rather than trying to win a battle in the hallways of the statehouse," he said.

Since then, the battle over right-to-work has shifted to the courts. Indiana is appealing a Lake County ruling last September declaring the law unconstitutional. That case was brought by suburban Chicago-based Local 150 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, which also is fighting the law in federal courts.

While awaiting court rulings, "we have to go out there and mobilize our members" to build union strength, he said. That includes recruiting worker-friendly candidates for the General Assembly.

"It's going to take time, it's going to take a lot of patience," Voorhies said.

A request for an interview with Guyott was left with a union spokesman.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hallways and Roads
    I am glad that someone in the AFL-CIO leadership seems to acknowledge that yelling in the hallways and chambers at the Statehouse, as well and clogging the downtown streets with semis, was not the way to get the union point of view across. I would have voted for right to work just because of these silly attempts at intimidation.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT