IBJNews

New federal rules prompt ITT to change bonus-pay criteria

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ITT Educational Services Inc. still will pay bonuses to its top executives, but the awards no longer will be tied to school enrollment, the Carmel-based for-profit educator said in its annual proxy statement.

The decision stems from new regulations by the Department of Education, which are designed to slow the growth of for-profit schools and boost graduation rates. The regulations were in response to concerns schools were placing too much emphasis on enrollment growth vs. the success former students had in finding employment.

Rules require that at least 45 percent of former students be actively paying down their loans after leaving a for-profit school. If former students fail to achieve that threshold, the government will not allow a for-profit education program to accept federal student-loan funding. And, if repayment rates fall below 35 percent, the government will cut off student-loan funding entirely for any new students.

“As a result of the prohibition on basing any portion of the executives’ compensation on performance, the Compensation Committee did not establish a bonus program for 2011,” ITT said in its proxy filed on Tuesday.

Still, ITT CEO Kevin M. Modany is slated this year to earn a $1.1 million bonus, according to the proxy, though the amount is no longer based on performance metrics, such as enrollment growth.

While ITT said it no longer can base compensation on performance, the company said it still will strive to offer pay packages that “reflect the competitive marketplace in order for us to attract, retain and motivate talented executives.” ITT said it also will include stock-based compensation in the packages “in order to align the executives’ interests with those of our shareholders.”

Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, ITT’s chief financial officer, is set to receive a $324,000 bonus, and three other executives should receive additional compensation ranging from $263,000 to $319,000.

Modany earned a total of $6.7 million in 2010, 11.5 percent less than the previous year. Much of the decline was in performance pay—$1.4 million in 2009 compared with $480,625 last year. He received nearly the same amount of stock option awards, valued at $5.4 million, both years.

ITT’s CEO earned a base pay of $769,000 in 2010 and is expected to receive a 2.5-percent raise this year, pushing his annual base salary to $788,250 in 2011.

CFO Fitzpatrick earned $1.4 million in total compensation last year, 20 percent less than in 2009. He also will receive a 2.5-percent increase this year in base salary, which will climb to $332,000.

Total pay in 2010 for other ITT top executives:

— Chief Administrative and Legal Officer Clark D. Elwood earned $1.4 million, down 21.9 percent.

— Technical Institute Division President Eugene Feichtner earned $1.3 million, down 17.1 percent.

— Online Division President June M. McCormack earned $1.2 million, down 18 percent.

ITT currently enrolls about 80,000 students.

For 2010, ITT grew profit by nearly 25 percent over the previous year, to $374.2 million. Revenue surged 21 percent, to nearly $1.6 billion.

Company shares were trading mid-morning at $57.03 each, down from a 52-week high of $64 reached in January.

 


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ITT gets hit
    What goes around...comes around for ITT. This company and its over paid executives have profited for too long, and now, this company is struggling to survive in an environment they will not be able to compete in any longer. The days of gouging students and the Federal government are gone!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT