New group trying to raise profile of community colleges

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Community college leaders in Virginia, Indiana and other states say their schools' roles in giving students an affordable education and job training are undervalued, so they're banding together to fight for federal policy changes.

Virginia Community College System Chancellor Glenn DuBois and his counterparts in Indiana, Louisiana and North Carolina have formed Rebuilding the Middle Class. The coalition, which held its first meeting last week in the group's home base of Indianapolis, is raising money in hopes of building its profile among the public and with lawmakers.

"We were seen as high schools with ashtrays — we weren't real," DuBois said. "The perception was that this was the place to go if you couldn't get into college."

That has changed as more employers now require a post-secondary education while the costs for attending four-year schools have skyrocketed. The two-year schools are typically far less-expensive to attend and serve as an interim step for many students between high school and four-year colleges and universities.

Community colleges in particular have seen a growing number of low-income and minority students attain credentials, associate's degrees and workforce certificates over the past two decades.

Joe May, president of the Louisiana Community and Technical College System, heads the new group. He said that although community colleges have become more important in recent decades, federal policies and programs created to aid students — including grant and loan funding — haven't grown accordingly.

"Since the Pell Grant was created in the 1970s, they haven't fundamentally changed, but students really have changed," May said. "In the 1970s, the majority attending college were young and lived on campus. Students today are much older, a majority are working while going to school and half of undergraduate enrollment is at community colleges."

Also, the required education level for workers has increased, heightening the need for post-secondary education. In the 1970s, 75 percent of middle-class jobs required only a high school diploma. By 2007, that figure had dropped to 40 percent, May said, citing a Georgetown University workforce study.

Federal grant programs such as Pell grants and Perkins loans for low-income students need to better accommodate part-time students and students with families to help them meet employers' expectations, he said.

Since he took office, President Barack Obama has touted the role community colleges play in training workers for jobs in high-demand fields. So has Vice President Joe Biden's wife, Jill Biden, an English teacher at Northern Virginia Community College.

A $10 billion initiative proposed in 2009 was aimed at growing the U.S. work force by increasing the number of community-college graduates. "But his proposal fizzled," DuBois noted, and Congress decided to make it a competitive grant program worth $2 billion over four years.

"We just need more help in getting that conversation going so that important policymakers will see the value of this tool when they're making important decisions about the economy and the workforce," he said.

In Virginia, for example, two-thirds of undergraduates at public colleges and universities are enrolled in community colleges, and 40 percent of next year's graduates will have had taken coursework at community colleges, DuBois said. There are about 400,000 Virginians enrolled in either credit-granting courses or workforce-training programs in the state's community college system. In comparison, there were about 164,000 undergraduates at Virginia's public four-year schools and about 81,000 at the four-year private colleges last fall.

Besides DuBois and May, the founders of Rebuilding America's Middle Class include R. Scott Ralls, president of the North Carolina Community College System, and Tom Snyder, president of Ivy Tech Community College System in Indiana.

The fledgling group has partnered with not-for-profits such as the Lumina Foundation, a group that aims to increase the number of Americans attaining college degrees. It also is coordinating with the American Association of Community Colleges, the main national advocacy group representing more than 1,100 two-year institutions.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).