IBJNews

New rules raise stakes for Lilly drug

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Drugmakers—including Eli Lilly and Co.—testing experimental Alzheimer’s medicines got good news last week when the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association proposed new guidelines to make earlier diagnoses of the disease.

If adopted, those guidelines—along with new forms of testing for Alzheimer’s—are expected to triple the prevalence of the disease, which now stands at 5.3 million Americans, according to the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions.

That’s great if you’re trying to sell a product to that market, as drugmakers are clamoring to do. They have more than 100 experimental Alzheimer’s medicines in human testing right now, according to The New York Times.

Lilly can claim four of those, including two in Phase 3 clinical trials, the last stage before seeking market approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.Those late-stage drugs attempt to block or reduce levels of protein plaques in the brain, called amyloid beta, which are thought to cause the telltale memory loss of Alzheimer’s.

But there is a problem, the Times noted in a July 16 story. The FDA says it needs to know not just that a drug reduced or even eliminated amyloid plaque, but also that patients taking the drug experienced better memory and clearer thinking. But with a slow-progressing disease like Alzheimer’s, the time it would take to document such changes could make testing too expensive for drug companies.

That’s especially the case for Lilly, which is hoping a breakthrough Alzheimer’s drug might produce the kind of blockbuster sales it needs to offset the loss of revenue from its antispychotic drug Zyprexa, which will lose its protection against cheap generic copies in October 2011.

Current medicines give only temporary relief of the symptoms of Alzheimer's, but do not appear to slow progression of the disease. That's why, even before the new recommended guidelines were announced, Barcalys Capital analyst Tony Butler predicted an Alzheimer’s drug that actually prevents or reverses the disease could fetch sales of $5 billion a year, according to Bloomberg News.

That’s roughly the amount of revenue Lilly stands to lose from its schizophrenia drug Zyprexa—and the company has few other drug candidates near enough to market approval to fill in that looming revenue gap.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • New rules
    *New rules* includes the level playing field of the Internet.The World Wide Web enables the little guy whistle-blowers to inform on any company malfeasance,such was Zyprexa.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT