New Interstate 69 shows poor judgment

May 15, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

Two of the principal obligations of government are that it should be accountable to its citizens, and that it should operate at a reasonable level of efficiency. In the case of the proposed Interstate 69 highway, many farmers, business owners and other residents along the proposed route believe that state government is meeting neither of these responsibilities.

My brother and I own several farms in the path of I-69. Of the 800 acres we own, three farms will be impacted in Pike and Gibson counties. It’s a distinct possibility that up to 520 acres we’ve farmed for generations will be taken for the highway. Not only will thousands of acres of farms like ours be condemned by the state, but communities will be divided.

In our recovering economy, small businesses are key drivers for growth. Consider how businesses along the proposed I-69 will be affected. In Martinsville, Towne View Auto Clinic, a locally owned auto repair shop, will likely be forced to move or close because of an interchange. Martinsville Golf Club, a family-owned public golf course, could close because of I-69’s restricted access. Other businesses along State Road 37 worry about their businesses. Indiana Hardwood Mills near State Road 37 will face restricted access and a loss of Indiana’s timber resource due to the thousands of acres of forest that I-69 will destroy.

Sometimes these sacrifices are considered justified for the sake of the public good, but does this 142-mile interstate highway really qualify as a public good, given its high cost in public dollars, the loss of Hoosiers’ homes, farms and businesses, and a degraded environment?

How could the state be acting for the public good when it begins construction on a highway expected to cost over $3 billion without knowing where 75 percent of the money will come from? At the same time, city streets and county roads remain in disrepair. Thousands of bridges are in dismal condition.

Others have noticed. The conservative Reason Foundation’s latest “Annual Highway Report” dropped Indiana from 15th to 31st in its state-by-state ranking of highway system efficiency, because of a sharp decline in urban interstate condition and an increase in spending per mile.

Allen R. Rumble
Investment adviser representativeTotal Financial Group Inc


  • taking the immigration issues to Indiana
    I'm in total agreement with you Allen. The trade route not only destroys rural Indiana but feeds a system of transportation that is expensive and environmentally unsustainable. As a continuation of the NAFTA paradigm it will also drag Indiana into the grievous immigration issues we have here in Arizona. The Indiana lawmakers need to re-visit this economic disaster in light of the recent oil spill and the border wars in AZ. As long as folks in Mexico are forced to desperate measures of survival due to NAFTA, the I-69 trade route will quickly become the drug and crime route ... forcing Indiana citizens to bear immigration and enforcement costs. Not pretty.
  • Get Involved!
    Thank you, Allen, for sharing your personal story about how this monstrosity is affecting your family. We need more people across this state to raise this issue with their elected officials and stop this project before it destroys any more of rural Southern Indiana.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ