NEWSMAKER: Clark lands jobs as airport CEO

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review

In April, it was the best of times—and worst of times—for John D. Clark III to take the job as CEO of the Indianapolis Airport Authority.

On one hand, Clark stepped up to a larger airport—from a similar position at Jacksonville International Airport. And the digs here aren’t bad, either—a new, $1.1 billion passenger terminal.

John Clark

At the same time, Clark arrived as airport bean counters figured revenue was expected to fall $15 million below projections. Amid a recession, passenger traffic dived 10 percent and cargo volume 16 percent.

The airport also faces in 2010 negotiating new agreements with airlines. They were asked to pay more during better times for the new terminal and its $40 million-a-year mortgage.

To make rents and landing fees palatable, Clark needs to hold the line on airport costs. Even some of the authority’s top executives were sacrificed this year, including the heads of retail and parking.

Clark also wants to grow airport revenue.

“My hope is that we will begin to look at ways to put some other types of development in place so we’re not as dependent on people flying in and out,” Clark told IBJ in August.

Look for example, at cargo and logistics, he says, pointing to multiple interstate connections and FedEx’s No. 2 U.S. hub at the airport. “We need to begin to look at how to diversify our revenues.”

Clark has plenty of best practices to draw from. He was named chairman of the North American division of Airports Council International, the trade group for big airports.

Tens of thousands of dollars he spent on trips to ACI events around the world while working in Jacksonville fueled criticism of Clark in that city’s alternative newspaper, Folioweekly. The Indianapolis Airport Authority board dismissed those reports, saying Clark has high marks in the industry.

Clark’s predecessor, John Kish, left to head a municipal stadium project in Evansville.•



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing