IBJNews

NFL exec tours city, checks on Super Bowl preparations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

National Football League Senior Vice President Frank Supovitz—the league’s point person on Super Bowl planning—is in town to tour the city and examine its preparations for the 2012 Super Bowl.

It’s Supovitz’s first visit to Indianapolis since he toured the city and discussed planning with 2012 Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee members last June.

Last summer, Supovitz told a gathering at the Crowne Plaza Hotel at Union Station that the city was “far ahead” of schedule in planning for the 2012 event. He added that despite the swooning economy, he didn’t believe the city’s financing of the event would be a problem, noting that $25 million had already been pledged from local private funders.

Supovitz is scheduled to make a public address and answer questions from local media Friday at 3 p.m. at the Keep Indianapolis Beautiful headquarters, 1029 Fletcher Ave.

This week, Supovitz toured the Super Bowl legacy project on the city’s east side, Lucas Oil Stadium and Indiana Convention Center as well as the University of Indianapolis, where the NFC Championship team will work out.

Supovitz has met and was meeting Thursday and Friday with Mark Miles, local Super Bowl host committee chairman, and Allison Melangton, the host committee’s CEO, along with Indiana Sports Corp. President Susan Williams and Susan Baughman, ISC senior vice president of event management and other local officials.

“This helps us put more meat on the bones of our plans,” said Dianna Boyce, 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee communications director. “These meetings allow us to bring [Supovitz] up to speed on what we’re doing here and allow us to get input on things we need to work on.”

Supovitz took an in-depth tour Thursday of the University of Indianapolis campus where the NFC champion will work out while here for the Super Bowl. The AFC champion will work out at the Indianapolis Colts training complex on the city’s northwest side.

Original plans called for the domed practice facility to be built at Arsenal Tech High School on the near-east side as part of a larger neighborhood revitalization project. But local Super Bowl committee members chose to team with UIndy, largely because it had already slated to break ground on an indoor, multi-purpose sports facility. Work on that project began in May.

UIndy has budgeted about $6 million for the practice facility. Bringing it up to NFL specifications could cost the committee an additional $1 million, which would be much less than building a new facility at Tech, Miles said.

Miles said the committee also chose UIndy because such a large structure would not have blended well with the near-east-side neighborhood.

The dome that has been in the planning stages for three years will be built on the northeastern corner of the UIndy campus, near the football stadium. It will be large enough to house an indoor football field, as well as an attached, 20,000-square-foot building with coaches’ offices, meeting rooms and training facilities.

Tech High School and the surrounding neighborhood still will benefit from the city’s Super Bowl, and Supovitz got a detailed report and tour of activities there. The committee unveiled plans in April for its $11.2 million, so-called “legacy project,” which includes a 27,000-square-foot, $6 million community center on the Tech campus.

The facility will host the NFL Youth Education Town during the Super Bowl and will provide neighborhood programs and youth-development activities in partnership with Indianapolis Public Schools.

A major part of the city’s bid to host the game is the NFL’s legacy project. The aim is to spur redevelopment on the city’s blighted near-east side by rehabbing or building about 300 housing units and constructing the community center at Arsenal Tech.

About four in 10 houses are unoccupied in the neighborhood, which is bounded by Interstate 70 to the north, Washington Street to the south, Interstate 65 to the west and Emerson Avenue to the east.

ISC’s Williams, along with Melangton and Miles, gave Supovitz a detailed update on that project this week. ISC’s Baughman detailed plans on downtown infrastructures and activities, including the planned Super Bowl village.

The Super Bowl is expected to generate a one-time economic boost of more than $300 million for the city, including more than $30 million in state and local tax revenue, according to Ball State University’s Bureau of Business Research.

One major issue hanging over the 2012 Super Bowl is the collective bargaining agreement between the league’s players and owners. The current deal expired after last season, with a provision to play the upcoming season without a salary cap.

The league’s 32 team owners have said that if a new deal with players is not worked out by August 2011, the players likely will be locked out. Owners are asking players for significant salary and contract concessions. If the issue is not resolved before the 2011-12 season begins, the season and Super Bowl could be delayed or even cancelled.

Supovitz is expected to address the possibility of a lock-out and contingency plans should the 2012 Super Bowl get postponed or cancelled. That could be a sticky issue for the city, which has invested millions of dollars and tens of thousands of hours already to host the event.

The NFL has already awarded Super Bowl to New Orleans in 2013 and East Rutherford, N.J., in 2014.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • And Then
    And Then the NFL could always fine us for any unauthorized Super Bowl signage that never gets used, but may be in place anyway. Or, they are so nice, they probably won't. NOT!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT