Employer costs surge despite low inflation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Employer groups, who had pinned their hopes on the Senate version of health care reform, are not happy with the bill brought to the floor Saturday.

But to understand why such groups as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce do not oppose the bills, consider these numbers: health care costs for employers rose 5.5 percent nationally this year—even in a year with zero inflation.

In Indiana, it was even worse, with health care costs increasing 6.6 percent.

Those data come from an annual survey of nearly 3,000 employers by Mercer Health & Benefits, a New York-based consulting firm. In Indiana, the firm interviewed 70 employers.

“You’ve got people worried about potential layoffs, so people run to the doctor,” said Bob Boyer, a principal of Mercer Health & Benefits in Indianapolis. He also noted that even people who lost their jobs could get coverage under COBRA legislation, which requires their former employers to contribute some to their health benefits.

The increases nationally were the smallest in a decade. But they also came because employers shifted more costs to their employees, particularly by raising deductibles. And employers plan more cost-shifting next year.

In Indiana, employers said health care costs would have risen 9.3 percent next year had they made no changes from their 2009 plans. As it is, costs are expected to rise 6.2 percent next year.

Already, health care costs per employee are about 4-percent higher in Indiana than the rest of the country, according to Mercer. Employers paid nearly $9,300 per employee this year.

Employers typically picked up 75 percent to 80 percent of those costs. But Boyer said he’s seeing that number move down to 70 percent, leaving workers to pick up a larger share.

“On the whole, these employers are under a lot of pressure,” he said.

But employers don’t see it as a viable option to drop health benefits. The percentage of employers offering health benefits remained unchanged at 65 percent. And 44 percent of employers who don’t offer health benefits now said they would if Congress approves fines for individuals who don’t have coverage.

Consumer-directed health plans gained in popularity among smaller companies, in large part because they cost employers about 20-percent less per employee than a typical preferred-provider organization plan. Among firms with fewer than 500 workers, 15 percent now offer a consumer-directed plan, up from 9 percent a year ago.

Among employers with more than 500 workers, 20 percent offer a consumer-directed plan.

The plans are far more popular in Indiana, with 42 percent of all employers offering one, Mercer’s survey found.


  • it's all good...
    ...as long as your an Anthem exec or shareholder...otherwise you're screwed! hey I've got it, how 'bout a govt. takeover of health care...at least we can put the bastards in jail if they try to profit off of other's ill health!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.