IBJNews

Employer costs surge despite low inflation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Employer groups, who had pinned their hopes on the Senate version of health care reform, are not happy with the bill brought to the floor Saturday.

But to understand why such groups as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce do not oppose the bills, consider these numbers: health care costs for employers rose 5.5 percent nationally this year—even in a year with zero inflation.

In Indiana, it was even worse, with health care costs increasing 6.6 percent.

Those data come from an annual survey of nearly 3,000 employers by Mercer Health & Benefits, a New York-based consulting firm. In Indiana, the firm interviewed 70 employers.

“You’ve got people worried about potential layoffs, so people run to the doctor,” said Bob Boyer, a principal of Mercer Health & Benefits in Indianapolis. He also noted that even people who lost their jobs could get coverage under COBRA legislation, which requires their former employers to contribute some to their health benefits.

The increases nationally were the smallest in a decade. But they also came because employers shifted more costs to their employees, particularly by raising deductibles. And employers plan more cost-shifting next year.

In Indiana, employers said health care costs would have risen 9.3 percent next year had they made no changes from their 2009 plans. As it is, costs are expected to rise 6.2 percent next year.

Already, health care costs per employee are about 4-percent higher in Indiana than the rest of the country, according to Mercer. Employers paid nearly $9,300 per employee this year.

Employers typically picked up 75 percent to 80 percent of those costs. But Boyer said he’s seeing that number move down to 70 percent, leaving workers to pick up a larger share.

“On the whole, these employers are under a lot of pressure,” he said.

But employers don’t see it as a viable option to drop health benefits. The percentage of employers offering health benefits remained unchanged at 65 percent. And 44 percent of employers who don’t offer health benefits now said they would if Congress approves fines for individuals who don’t have coverage.

Consumer-directed health plans gained in popularity among smaller companies, in large part because they cost employers about 20-percent less per employee than a typical preferred-provider organization plan. Among firms with fewer than 500 workers, 15 percent now offer a consumer-directed plan, up from 9 percent a year ago.

Among employers with more than 500 workers, 20 percent offer a consumer-directed plan.

The plans are far more popular in Indiana, with 42 percent of all employers offering one, Mercer’s survey found.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • it's all good...
    ...as long as your an Anthem exec or shareholder...otherwise you're screwed! hey I've got it, how 'bout a govt. takeover of health care...at least we can put the bastards in jail if they try to profit off of other's ill health!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT