Employer costs surge despite low inflation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Employer groups, who had pinned their hopes on the Senate version of health care reform, are not happy with the bill brought to the floor Saturday.

But to understand why such groups as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce do not oppose the bills, consider these numbers: health care costs for employers rose 5.5 percent nationally this year—even in a year with zero inflation.

In Indiana, it was even worse, with health care costs increasing 6.6 percent.

Those data come from an annual survey of nearly 3,000 employers by Mercer Health & Benefits, a New York-based consulting firm. In Indiana, the firm interviewed 70 employers.

“You’ve got people worried about potential layoffs, so people run to the doctor,” said Bob Boyer, a principal of Mercer Health & Benefits in Indianapolis. He also noted that even people who lost their jobs could get coverage under COBRA legislation, which requires their former employers to contribute some to their health benefits.

The increases nationally were the smallest in a decade. But they also came because employers shifted more costs to their employees, particularly by raising deductibles. And employers plan more cost-shifting next year.

In Indiana, employers said health care costs would have risen 9.3 percent next year had they made no changes from their 2009 plans. As it is, costs are expected to rise 6.2 percent next year.

Already, health care costs per employee are about 4-percent higher in Indiana than the rest of the country, according to Mercer. Employers paid nearly $9,300 per employee this year.

Employers typically picked up 75 percent to 80 percent of those costs. But Boyer said he’s seeing that number move down to 70 percent, leaving workers to pick up a larger share.

“On the whole, these employers are under a lot of pressure,” he said.

But employers don’t see it as a viable option to drop health benefits. The percentage of employers offering health benefits remained unchanged at 65 percent. And 44 percent of employers who don’t offer health benefits now said they would if Congress approves fines for individuals who don’t have coverage.

Consumer-directed health plans gained in popularity among smaller companies, in large part because they cost employers about 20-percent less per employee than a typical preferred-provider organization plan. Among firms with fewer than 500 workers, 15 percent now offer a consumer-directed plan, up from 9 percent a year ago.

Among employers with more than 500 workers, 20 percent offer a consumer-directed plan.

The plans are far more popular in Indiana, with 42 percent of all employers offering one, Mercer’s survey found.


  • it's all good...
    ...as long as your an Anthem exec or shareholder...otherwise you're screwed! hey I've got it, how 'bout a govt. takeover of health care...at least we can put the bastards in jail if they try to profit off of other's ill health!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.