IBJNews

North of South financing clears first hurdle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The proposed $155 million mixed-use project known as North of South cleared another hurdle Wednesday afternoon when the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission blessed a possible financing arrangment involving the city.

Locally based Buckingham Cos. is leading the development set to be built on 14 acres owned by Eli Lilly and Co. north of South Street between Delaware Street and Virginia Avenue downtown.

The city is offering to provide an $86 million loan for the project by issuing bonds and using income generated by the development to pay off the costs. It also will spend $9 million on infrastructure to get the project off the ground. The MDC approved the financing with an 8-0 vote.

Development plans call for a boutique hotel, retail space, a YMCA branch and 320 upscale apartments on a site now used for parking. Buckingham would like to break ground on the project by the end of the year but faces a difficult timeline to get all approvals.

“I think it will be a terrific addition to the city,” MDC member Diana Hamilton said of the project.

Hamilton threw her support behind North of South after she and other MDC members serving on the commission’s economic development committee heard financing details Wednesday morning from city officials and Buckingham representatives.

Developers did their best to alleviate any fears that the city might be on the hook for the loan if the project were to fail by presenting a laundry list of safeguards.

Those safeguards include a $6.9 million reserve funded by Buckingham; an assurance that 125 percent of the estimated debt will be covered by project revenue; and an agreement that Buckingham will not receive any profit until the developer has paid all outstanding debts.

Further, the city will be shielded from any risk for five years from the project’s start date and will drop its involvement after 10 years. Buckingham then will need to refinance remaining debt with a traditional bank.

“We understand it’s a bit of a new way of doing things,” acknowledged Deron Kintner, director of the Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank. “But we think we’ve taken certain steps to mitigate that risk.”

The $155 million price tag for the project includes the $86 million city loan and its $9 million pledge for infrastructure improvements, as well as a $7 million contribution from Buckingham, a $6 million grant from the Indiana Economic Development Corp., the $29 million in land Lilly is donating and $18 million for the YMCA branch.

If one take's the YMCA out of the equation, because it will provide its own funding, Indianapolis is financing nearly 64 percent of the project—a large amount for the city to swallow, MDC member Randy Snyder said.

“I just want to make sure we do everything we can to protect the city,” he said.

Instead of $86 million, however, the city actually is borrowing $98 million to pay for administrative costs related to the bond sale and for interest payments while the project is under construction.

City officials said the additional $12 million adds flexibility to the bond issue because it’s often impossible to know how the bond markets will perform between the time of filing and issuing of debt. They also say bond issues involve “soft costs,” such as interest.

Lilly will continue to own the land, so the state’s involvement makes the project a public-private partnership. The state is contributing because it plans to designate an area within the development as a certified technology center.

The city has had discussions with a few universities that might be interested in occupying space within the tech center but has no agreement yet, Deputy Mayor Michael Huber said.

The project is expected to create 2,200 temporary construction jobs and 200 permanent jobs. It also is anticipated to generate $1.7 million in annual revenue for the city.

The MDC next is expected to hear a request to rezone the property at its Dec. 15 meeting. The City-County Council ultimately needs to sign off on the project.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • bad deal
    Has anyone even heard of a Dolce Hotel? Check out their website...why would the City guarantee this loan....it has a 100% chance of foreclosing in 3 years.
  • sustainable infrastructure
    I think this is a great opportunity for Ballard to show how dedicated he is to sustainable infrastructure. If we are going to pay for it, make it right. I want to hear conversation of water reductions, permiability improvements, water quality improvements, energy reduction and renewable production! This seems to be a pretty large project to redefine this area of the city, do it right for once!
  • Why this spot and not Market Squre???
    Lots of money for a location much like the failure Market Square area and the failure City Market. I don't believe the city should finance this deal....such a good deal should be able to find financing outside the tax payers.
  • Banana Republic Government
    Sounds like Ablerock or a buddy of his will have a hand in the cookie jar. What a Banana Republic City Government. Yeah Buckingham will get no profit... Is Buckingham getting ANY development fee or any payments for developer overhead?
  • Hooray!
    Great news! This project is going to be a great win for the city. I'm a taxpayer who supports this project! :-)
    • any surprise?
      no big surprise. construction and service work will be pointed toward firms meeting specific criteria (mbe/wbe). what a game, what a shame.
    • I'm shocked by the audacity
      Rammed through. Rammed through against the express wishes of the taxpayers. And why they put a $29 million dollar figure in for the value of the land contributed by Lilly remains a curious question, since Lilly retains ownership of the land, and thereafter, its improvements. No. This was a terrible giveaway to Lilly, which could have afforded to develop its own undeveloped parking lots. Ballard lost a lot of friends ramming this through. The bond bank tied up another hundred million. And once again, to the detriment of the taxpayers, the slush fund operated efficiently without taxpayer restraint or oversight or approval. I'm shocked by the audacity.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

    2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

    3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

    4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

    5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

    ADVERTISEMENT