IBJNews

Not-for-profit hoping to grow microloan program

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local business advocacy is seeking to fill an underserved yet critical financing void by providing loans typically considered too small for banks to bother with.

The Business Ownership Initiative is ramping up its micro-loan program with the help of $150,000 in grants it received from the Glick Fund and the Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority.

The aim of the program is to give startups and even small established ventures access to as little as $1,000 to $10,000 in capital, or just enough to design a website or purchase equipment.

Within the next few years, though, BOI hopes to have enough cash to raise its lending limit closer to the $100,000 minimum that banks generally don’t cross.

“Unless you have friends, family or an extensive line of credit, it’s just not in a bank’s interest to do a lot of lending in space under six figures,” said Julie Grice, BOI’s executive director.

Grice, an entrepreneur herself, operated a consulting firm and a dental lab with her husband that made crowns and bridges before arriving at BOI in February 2011.

The not-for-profit, which operates on a $400,000 annual budget, has undergone a few changes since its inception in 1997 as the Neighborhood Self-Employment Initiative.

The most notable is its merger on May 17 with Develop Indy, the economic development group for Marion County. The transition was an easy one, though, as BOI already had an office within Develop Indy’s space at Chase Tower downtown.

The Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce and Indy Partnership also joined Develop Indy at the same time.

BOI provides one-on-one business counseling and free or low-cost workshops to fledgling entrepreneurs. But about 18 months ago, before Grice’s arrival, the initiative began to explore a micro-loan program and actually provided $4,000 loans last July to two companies.

Grice put the brakes on the program amid the move to Chase Tower, and to get better organized.

“The last thing I want to do as a former small-business owner is not be able to support people that we purport to be able to,” she said. “So we’re taking it slow.”

Stage Ninja LLC, a small manufacturer of professional audio equipment, with an office in the Stutz Building downtown, landed one of the $4,000 loans.

The six-person company launched in 2007 and quickly hit the recession, breaking even just last year. It used the BOI loan to purchase materials to grow its inventory of retractable cable systems for microphones and instruments.

“Four-thousand dollars is not a game-changer for many companies, but it was a great way to bridge the gap for us,” co-owner Brent Eskew said.

Eskew said Stage Ninja plans to repay the loan this month and reapply for another the same day.

If so, company owners will find a better-managed microloan program. BOI now has an underwriter on staff and is getting software to help it offer loans to more business owners. The city of Indianapolis is pitching in by funding the salary of a micro-loan services manager.

BOI is working with nine business owners to get their loan applications in order. Credit scores and tax returns are considered, of course, but the initiative really takes a hard look at their business plans to ensure they’re “tethered to reality,” Grice said.

Cash flow needs to be strong enough to enable owners to repay their loans within the typical 12 to 18 months.

Bruce Kidd, a senior vice president at Indianapolis-based Walker Information who has counseled entrepreneurs in the past, thinks BOI’s assistance will benefit its clientele.

“It’s high risk, but it’s economic gardening,” he said. “You’re trying to cultivate the soil, the landscape for these startups. You’ve got to provide some tender, loving care.

BOI also is working to establish a loan-loss reserve to offer protection from unpaid loans.

Interest on the loans of 7.5 percent to 8.5 percent would help make the program self-sustaining. But Grice hopes to receive funding from a couple of other sources to push the pool of available funds from $150,000 to seven figures.

“The question is,” she said, “do we need it?”

That remains to be seen. But what’s more clear is the need for small loans for service-type companies that don’t need a large pot of cash to purchase expensive equipment or machinery.

The only other option known to Grice and Kidd is Bangladesh-based Grameen Bank, which opened a branch in Indianapolis last summer. It provides microloans to the poor without requiring collateral.

Eskew at Stage Ninja can attest to the lack of interest in micro-lending.

“[BOI] was the first group that really looked at our business plan,” he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT