IBJNews

LOU'S VIEWS: Notes from Indy Fringe

Lou Harry
September 1, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

Another Indy Fringe festival has come and gone, and one of the most striking things for me this year was the lack of “must miss” shows. In a field of 56 separate productions, that’s pretty remarkable.

Let me backtrack a second.

First, in case you aren’t up to speed, Indy Fringe is a 10-day festival in August featuring the aforementioned 56 shows on seven stages. Unlike juried festivals, acts at Indy Fringe are not booked based on their perceived quality. In fact, Fringe organizers have no idea what the applicants will be doing.
 

ae-indyfringe-main-15col.jpg The Indy Fringe Building on St. Clair St. is a hub for Fringe activity. (Photo Courtesy of Daniel Axler)

Slots in the festival go to anyone who signs on and pays the entry fee early (with some allowances to ensure a mix of local and out-of-town acts). Want to tap dance while spinning plates? Go for it. Have a production of a Sophocles play your troupe wants to try? That’s fine, as long as you can do it in under an hour and clean up in 10 minutes so the next show can set up.

No surprise that, in the past, there have always been a few duds. Even when I’ve managed to dodge those bullets, patrons often stop me on Mass Ave during Indy Fringe to tell me what they’ve suffered through in search of the good stuff.

Well, this year, I didn’t hear any of that, even from Fringe fanatics—and there seem to be more of them each year—who see a dozen or more shows over the course of the fest.

Having seen only six shows this year (besides the one I helped create), I don’t have enough data to conclude that the fest has gotten better. But that’s a possibility. It could be that theatrical Darwinism pushed producers who have had critical and box office hits to return while those responsible for critical and box office duds disappeared. And as the fest continues to grow,

it could be attracting more committed acts, motivating them to sign up before all the slots are gone.

Another possibility is that audiences are getting better at making choices and anticipating what they may or may not like. They certainly aren’t guided exclusively by critics. Nuvo Newsweekly is the only publication that exhaustively hits every show—and much of the blog commentary is puffery.

Could it be that we are getting softer—that Fringe audiences have become more tolerant of the presentations that miss the mark? Does our Hoosier niceness come through even when we’ve suffered through waste-of-even-10-bucks productions?

For some reason, I don’t think that’s the case—at least not for the person-on-the-street Fringe attendee.

Whatever the case, I hope the success of this year’s Indy Fringe (not just by virtue of its relative lack of duds but by more ticket sales, more money returned to acts, more sold-out shows) doesn’t mean more conservative choices. Part of what makes a Fringe Fest special is that artists are willing to take risks rather than just programming what they know an audience will respond to.

Risk-taking, though, doesn’t have to mean pushing envelopes. The highlight of what I saw at this year’s fest, for instance, came from No Exit, an Indy-based company best known for some pretty somber work, including the entire Oedipus trilogy staged at the Indianapolis Museum of Art earlier this year.


ae-fringe-peter-pan-15col.jpg Ryan Mullins stars in “I am Peter Pan.” (Photo Courtesy of Daniel Axler)

At Indy Fringe, No Exit stretched by doing something charming, sincere and (shock!) sweet: “I am Peter Pan,” a one-man play about a boy wrestling with his father’s illness by going on imagined adventures to Neverland. 

Directed and devised by Butler grad Michael Burke and anchored by a joyful and sad tour-de-force performance by Ryan Mullins, the show featured a relentlessly smile-inducing first half, hitting some dramaturgical snags but ending with raw emotional power. I’m not convinced all the elements quite fit together, but I laughed. I cried. And my anticipation for more No Exit productions increased dramatically.

I’m proud to be in a town with a Fringe fest that can make “I am Peter Pan” into a high-flying hit.

And, OK, there was a dud of an out-of-town improv group this year, but I’ve already forgotten its name.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT