Obama says U.S. should provide paid maternity leave

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

President Barack Obama said Monday that the United States should join the rest of the industrialized world and offer paid leave for mothers of newborns.

"Many women can't even get a paid day off to give birth — now that's a pretty low bar," Obama said at the White House Summit on Working Families. "That, we should be able to take care of."

The president is touting paid maternity in the midst of a midterm election campaign focused on women voters, without describing the details of how he would fund such a system. "If France can figure this out, we can figure this out," Obama said.

Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, responded to Obama by announcing he will would outline his vision Wednesday for "how modern conservative reforms can help bring the American Dream within reach for millions of single mothers, young Americans and working families."

"Telling federal agencies to do what they're already supposed to do and endorsing partisan legislation that will never pass is not the sort of bold, innovative leadership we need," Rubio said in a prepared statement.

While some companies offer paid family leave to attract workers, the 1993 Family Medical Leave Act only requires that employers provide unpaid leave for medical and family reasons.

Obama praised California, Rhode Island and New Jersey for creating a state benefit. But he has not endorsed legislation that would create a similar national system funded by a payroll tax, and he pledged in his 2008 presidential campaign not to raise taxes on families making under $250,000 a year.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., has introduced legislation that would provide up to 12 weeks of paid leave through a fund in the Social Security Administration, paid for by contributions from employees and employers of 0.2 percent of wages. She said she has personally encouraged the president to back it, despite his tax pledge.

"We're talking about 2 cents of every $10," she said in an interview at the summit. She said without such a fund, eight out of 10 workers can't take advantage of their right for family leave because they can't afford it.

Obama instituted six weeks of paid leave for White House staff when they have a child, get sick or injured or need to care for an ailing family member, using his authority to set his staff's compensation under the personnel code. He does not have the power to award paid leave to other federal workers without congressional action since they are covered under a different section of law. The White House has supported the goal of legislation introduced by lawmakers to change that, but it has stalled in Congress.

"There is only one developed country in the world that does not offer paid maternity leave, and that is us," Obama said. "And that is not the list you want to be on — on your lonesome. It's time to change that."

He also directed federal agencies to expand flexible work arrangements where possible, and Obama chief of staff Dennis McDonough said in a staff memo that includes the White House — a hard-charging environment where long hours are the norm. "I know how hard each of you works to support the president and the nation. Please know that we'll be looking for ways to better support you as well," McDonough wrote.

Obama took four working parents out to lunch at Chipotle before his speech and after met with business leaders with family-friendly policies. He urged Congress to pass legislation requiring employers to accommodate pregnant employees so they can continue to perform their jobs.

The summit included a surprise appearance by a celebrity to echo Obama's criticism of "Mad Men" policies in today's workplace. Christina Hendricks, who plays single mom Joan on the AMC dramatization of a 1960s ad firm, said, "In the 21st century the only place for a story like Joan's should be on TV."

Mrs. Obama closed the summit by encouraging young women not to short-change themselves in career negotiations. And she said she hopes to see a woman in the country's top job as president soon.

"That should happen as soon as possible," she said. "We have some options, don't we?"

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said in a statement that while the summit’s focus is “on creating a 21st century workplace that works for all Americans,” the “trouble is, too many middle-class families aren’t working at all. And those that are lucky enough to have a job are barely getting by with stagnant wages and higher costs on nearly everything.”

Senate Republicans support more flexibility for private-sector workers similar to the voluntary flex time that federal employees have, Senator Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement.

A report from Obama’s economic advisers released in connection with the summit said women are still more likely to work in low-wage jobs than men and are more likely to be paid the minimum wage. The earnings of married women account for 44 percent of a family’s wages last year, compared with 37 percent in the 1970s. More than 40 percent of mothers are the sole or primary income source for their families.


  • Any restrictions?
    Various proposals mentioned here include 12 weeks paid maternity leave, and six weeks paid leave when one has a child, gets sick or injured, or needs to care for an ailing family member. Let's say a woman takes three maternity leaves over a 10 year period, for a total of 36 paid weeks off, or almost 7% of the total time. Is she then going to file a lawsuit for equal pay when she discovers that her single male co-worker, with a near perfect attendance record, is getting paid more, because the company determines he is worth more to them because he produces more? Likewise, let's say a male worker takes off six paid weeks every year to recuperate from various injuries, take care of his sick kids, or care for his aging parents. So now he has missed, and gotten paid for almost 12% of his time, time for which he has produced nothing for his employer. How is that fair for the other employees, who show up each and every day? If a company wants to offer these benefits on their own, I don't have a problem with that. They can choose to do so, and they would probably reflect their compensation based partly on much employees took advantage of any of these programs. However, the government should never force a company to provide this type of benefit. There is too much potential for abuse and unequal application and compensation. And, once again, we have a proposal, not surprisingly, introduced by a Democrat, that will cost "only" 2 cents for every $10 earned, to pay for. What she doesn't say is that the meager 2 cents actually adds up to real dollars over the course of a year, but what does she care; it's not her money.
  • Family
    Meanwhile Obama continues to ignore the actual problem - the increase in single parent homes. Obama will always talk about being the guy who wants to help the poor or solve the problem, but he does this by first making the other party look as if they hate the poor or that they don't care about maternity leave all while taking the focus on actually solving the problem. He'll spout off some talking point about how parent working full time should be able to pay the bills, while ignoring the fact that min wage was never intended to be something a single parent would earn to raise a family. Focus on the destruction of our families instead of the resulting crisis. Fix the problem, instead of attempting to Band-Aid. Every Obama solution always starts with a way to divide Americans and attack GOP. Guess it should be expected from someone with nothing more than a community organizer from corrupt chicago political.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.