IBJNews

Occupy Indy protesters ordered to clear out camp

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

State officials gave Occupy Indy protesters 24 hours to remove their tents, sleeping bags and other camping accessories from the Indiana Statehouse lawn and warned there could be arrests Thursday should anybody resist the efforts to remove the items.

The Department of Administration ordered the handful of remaining protesters to clear out in a letter delivered Wednesday afternoon.

The state ordered the protesters to clear out "all personal property, including tents, sleeping bags, and tarps." Anything left will be removed Thursday and taken to a Department of Sanitation parking garage.

Protester Adam Horter, 21, of Westfield, said his first feeling was "fury" after a state worker delivered the orders to protesters. ACLU Indiana Legal Director Ken Falk, who has provided advice to the protesters, said he was still reviewing the letter.

Department of Administration Commissioner Rob Wynkoop said he conferred with state police over the last week and had become concerned about the safety of the protesters and anyone visiting the Statehouse.

He emphasized protesters would be able to stay as long as they want, just without the camping equipment and other supplies they have assembled over the last few weeks.

"They are welcome to be there; it is their right to peaceably assemble," he said Wednesday.

Protesters said the order was not about their safety but about stifling their demonstration.

"They're coming up with everything they possibly can," Greg Lambert, 52, of Indianapolis, said of the administration.

The state says protesters will be allowed to continue their demonstration around-the-clock — just without the camping chairs, food and other camping accessories the small group has collected over the last five weeks.

Police in New York and Oakland cleared out large encampments of protesters this week. But Indiana's occupy protesters and police have been much more subdued since the Indianapolis demonstration started last month.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • First Amendment Rights
    I'm all for the rights granted in the first amendment. I was part of the antiwar movement in the 60's. So, I don't need a lecture from those that think they have a license to behave. There is a big difference between saying what you want in a free society and demanding the "occupation" of a public facility to create chaos and unhealthy conditions.

    Feel free to protest away, but if you want to occupy, try your back yard.
  • 1st Amendment Rights
    This is really a shame, and feels like the early stages of a police state to me. How does taking away tents, chairs, tables, coolers, etc solve anything? It doesn't. It just puts more unnecessary burden on the occupiers. While probably "legal", it's definitely a heavy handed approach to discourage those choosing to exercise their first amendment rights.
  • Say what? BerwickGuy
    Let me repeat my earlier comment: "There is something going on here and you don't know what it is, do you Mr. Jones."
  • MPA2000
    Your comment is so irrational it is laughable. Same people? Same situation? The differences are obvious. Protestors in China were those for democracy. Protestors here are those for socialism.

    Back to classroom for you, dude.
  • You need a plan
    Sitting around isn't protesting anything, sitting in parks isn't protesting either. In order to protest you have to have goals, ideas...A PLAN! You have to take concepts of protests in the past and present and hone them to today's ventures.
  • Welcome to Amerika
    Funny how the same people who applauded the protestors in Iran and China, are condemning those who protest here.

    USA=Iran=China.
    • Say what? Torch
      "There is something going on here and you don't know what it is, do you Mr. Jones."
    • Chase 'em off
      Fun's over. Get out and get jobs, ya bums.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

    2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

    3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

      My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

    4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

      Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

    5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

      My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

      It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

      Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

      The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

    ADVERTISEMENT