IBJNews

Officials asked to investigate McIntosh residency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An attorney asked state and county election officials Thursday to investigate whether Indiana Republican 5th District congressional candidate David McIntosh committed voter fraud and perjury.

Attorney Jonathan Sturgill filed complaints with the Indiana secretary of state's office and the Madison County Election Board, WIBC and The Indianapolis Star reported. Sturgill represents Greg Wright, who also challenged the residency of Republican U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar.

McIntosh represented Indiana in Congress from 1995-2000. In 2005, he moved to Arlington, Va., where he works as a lobbyist. Critics claim he has voted in Indiana the past six years from addresses he rented or owned when he actually lives in Virginia. He is running in the May 8 primary using the address of property he rents in Anderson.

McIntosh says his votes are in line with Indiana residency laws, which center on a voter's intent to return to the state. He says Virginia law required him to get a Virginia driver's license while living there. His campaign released a statement blasting the residency challenge as "a highly unoriginal attack" and an attempt to divert voters from his conservative platform.

McIntosh's attorney wrote a letter to Madison County Prosecutor Rodney Cummings in July, citing legal precedents to confirm McIntosh's residency. Cummings found that McIntosh has taken reasonable steps to maintain his residency.

Sturgill has also asked Cummings to reassess that opinion, which he says focuses on case law covering eligibility to run for office, and not on possible voter fraud or perjury.

Cummings said Thursday he would not review the complaint until after the May 8 primary. He said the timing of Sturgill's request seemed politically motivated.

A spokesman for Secretary of State Connie Lawson said she would need to review the filing before deciding how to proceed.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • intent
    If a voter's "intent" is all that is necessary to support residency, then former Secretary of State Charlie White should not have been convicted of voter fraud.
  • Grant him a waiver
    Irrrespective of the legality of his residency, if he's willing to move from Arlington, VA to ANDERSON? I'd say let him go!

    Then again, if he does get convicted of something and winds up in the Pendleton Reformatory, his relatives won't have as far to drive on visitation days!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT