IBJNews

Officials asked to investigate McIntosh residency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An attorney asked state and county election officials Thursday to investigate whether Indiana Republican 5th District congressional candidate David McIntosh committed voter fraud and perjury.

Attorney Jonathan Sturgill filed complaints with the Indiana secretary of state's office and the Madison County Election Board, WIBC and The Indianapolis Star reported. Sturgill represents Greg Wright, who also challenged the residency of Republican U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar.

McIntosh represented Indiana in Congress from 1995-2000. In 2005, he moved to Arlington, Va., where he works as a lobbyist. Critics claim he has voted in Indiana the past six years from addresses he rented or owned when he actually lives in Virginia. He is running in the May 8 primary using the address of property he rents in Anderson.

McIntosh says his votes are in line with Indiana residency laws, which center on a voter's intent to return to the state. He says Virginia law required him to get a Virginia driver's license while living there. His campaign released a statement blasting the residency challenge as "a highly unoriginal attack" and an attempt to divert voters from his conservative platform.

McIntosh's attorney wrote a letter to Madison County Prosecutor Rodney Cummings in July, citing legal precedents to confirm McIntosh's residency. Cummings found that McIntosh has taken reasonable steps to maintain his residency.

Sturgill has also asked Cummings to reassess that opinion, which he says focuses on case law covering eligibility to run for office, and not on possible voter fraud or perjury.

Cummings said Thursday he would not review the complaint until after the May 8 primary. He said the timing of Sturgill's request seemed politically motivated.

A spokesman for Secretary of State Connie Lawson said she would need to review the filing before deciding how to proceed.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • intent
    If a voter's "intent" is all that is necessary to support residency, then former Secretary of State Charlie White should not have been convicted of voter fraud.
  • Grant him a waiver
    Irrrespective of the legality of his residency, if he's willing to move from Arlington, VA to ANDERSON? I'd say let him go!

    Then again, if he does get convicted of something and winds up in the Pendleton Reformatory, his relatives won't have as far to drive on visitation days!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT