Opportunists hunt deals in commercial real estate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Just about every player in the real estate business—whether individual investor, private-equity fund or publicly traded company—is trying to raise capital to take advantage of what they see as an inevitable shakeout in commercial property.

More than $3 trillion in real estate loans, many of them the short-term and interest-only variety, come due in the next five years. Few owners have any equity left in their buildings, let alone enough to meet the higher thresholds banks are demanding for refinancing. And funding from commercial mortgage-backed securities—a $1 trillion funding source just three years ago—has disappeared entirely.

Meanwhile, banks have resisted calls to take drastic markdowns on their real estate portfolios, opting instead to wait out the market for more favorable valuations or an assist from Uncle Sam.

“Equity has been wiped out in virtually every real estate transaction—the question is, can you hold on until the market bails you out?” said Gene Zink, founder of Chicago-based Strategic Capital Partners LLC and a former longtime executive at locally based Duke Realty Corp.

“At some point, the regulators are going to call the banks out on bad loans,” he said. “At that point, there will be some pretty dramatic decreases in value in real estate.”

If banks are forced to reduce values to realistic levels, buyers are likely to come off the sidelines. More sales would give brokers and leasing agents an opportunity to compete for new business. And it would be good news for tenants since properties with murky ownership are less likely to pay broker commissions to attract deals or spring for tenant buildouts, said John Robinson, executive vice president in the local office of Chicago-based Jones Lang LaSalle.

“The whole market is on hold right now because value hasn’t been determined—foreclosures will set the floor,” Robinson said. “Banks need to either prove a property is worth what they have on their books, or get it off their books.”

Potential local targets for vulture investors include M&I Plaza, the Maxwell condo project downtown, Woodfield Crossing on the north side, and Metropolis mall in Plainfield.

Where banks used to loan 75 percent of a building’s value, now they’re doing 50 percent, said Zink, who expects the government will step in with programs to add liquidity to the commercial market like it did with the first-time homebuyer tax credit for residential property.

“The only transactions that are happening are fire-sale transactions where someone has thrown in the towel,” he said. “Clearly, as we recapitalize the real estate industry, the losers will be people who borrowed money two, three or five years ago. The winners will be those who have new capital that can take advantage of the pain that results from the refinancing.”

Zink’s Strategic Capital Partners has a $1 billion opportunity fund that’s fully invested, and it has set aside a “large amount of money” to see its properties through any wide-scale revaluation.

He thinks publicly traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs, will be the biggest players in snapping up distressed properties since they have access to public capital. That includes locally based Simon Property Group Inc., Duke Realty and Kite Realty Group Trust, where Zink serves on the board.

Dozens of private funds claim to have raised hundreds of billions of dollars to buy distressed assets, but Zink is skeptical. He figures some of the funds are exaggerating their numbers to attract attention from potential investors and the banks that hold properties they are targeting.

One group that has had success raising money is Chicago-based Michigan Avenue Real Estate Investors. The company is about halfway toward its goal of raising $50 million for an opportunity fund that will buy up to $250 million in distressed real estate. The fund is buying properties in Chicago, San Antonio and Denver and might buy in Indianapolis soon.

The fund’s focus is on residential properties, particularly unfinished or unsold condo developments that can be converted into apartments until market demand returns for condos, said Tom Meador, the fund’s CEO and an IU grad.

A big gap remains between what buyers are willing to pay and what sellers will accept, Meador said, so for now he and his partners are trying to cultivate relationships with banks that ultimately will decide which property loans are renegotiated and which are foreclosed.

Banks will favor funds that have capital to close on such deals. Among the investors in previous funds from Michigan Avenue is Chicago Bulls and Chicago White Sox Chairman Jerry Reinsdorf.

The company launched its first real estate opportunity fund in early 2007 after the principals got a peek at some bank balance sheets.

“We knew the banks had troubles, but when we got into their portfolios, oh my gosh,” Meador said. “They’re going to have to move eventually. They can’t sit on these problems in perpetuity.”

It might take a little prodding from the banks’ auditors or the federal government, he said.

The fund likes Indianapolis for its stability and growth and may also buy single-family home lots if the price is right.

Chairman Bob Judelson is predicting a boom in residential real estate to rival the 2005 run. The country’s population continues to grow, and people need a place to live.

“If Ford or GM stopped building cars for two years, Americans would be short of cars,” Judelson said. “If we don’t build lots, there won’t be anywhere to stick a home.”

Timing has worked out better for some investors than others. A group led by locally based Venture Real Estate tried to put together a $30 million vulture fund in December 2007, but the effort fizzled with just a few million dollars in commitments.

The group, which included prominent developers Paul Kite and Paul Rioux and Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, wanted to buy unsold condo properties in Florida but couldn’t find enough tangible properties to show potential investors, said Jeff Sealey, who briefly served as the fund’s managing director.

The timing is better now, but challenges remain.

“The bank owns half the real estate in town,” said Sealey, a former lender at Charter One. “The problem is finding the money and getting people off the fence.”•


  • Coment
    With the commercial real estate market in the throes of a major slump due to the double whammy of a recession . But the situation is changing.
    Through online we can find quality rental commercial properties and
    commercial real estate services in the US and Canada.
    It is free, easy-to-use search feature, renters can look for apartments,
    commercial office space
    and other commercial properties for rent or lease in their local area and abroad with great ease and accuracy.
    Property owners can also choose from hundreds of listed licensed realtors and property managers.
  • Emerging Opportunities
    It's a good time for planning to get into the market, raising capital, organizing your investment model and company, and identifying properties.

    With help for investors, see: http://thompsonlaw-in.com

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.