IBJOpinion

MARCUS: Opportunity to Think in Elkhart County

Morton Marcus
January 16, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Morton Marcus

Sometimes, to get perspective on an issue, I go to an expert on the subject. Thus I called Euturn Wright, America’s leading authority on economic development. My first question was, “Why has it been so long since I last heard from you?”

“Youngster,” he erroneously called me, “aside from the fact that few seek my services, Indiana hasn’t had enough economic development recently to attract my attention.”

“But,” I challenged, “the Indiana Department of Commerce … ”

Euturn interrupted me. “The Indiana Department of Commerce? Did you ever search for them on the Web? Know what you get on Yahoo? You get the Department of Corrections.”

“That’s not important,” I said. “Today’s Commerce Department is, in effect, a subsidiary of the Indiana Economic Development Corp. Isn’t the IEDC doing a bang-up job?”

“They do announce many ventures and many jobs,” he said. “But I find it hard to assess their long-term success. Certainly it is not in their annual report. In fact, the latest annual report on their Web site is for 2007.”

“Oh,” I responded, “cut them some slack. IEDC does what needs to be done: helps firms find communities in Indiana where they can be successful.”

“Yes,” Euturn admitted. “I saw that announcement last week about Think announcing its plan to build its all-electric City car in Elkhart County. I know you find that especially important because you have been working with the Elkhart Development Corp.”

I blushed in acknowledgement.

“No need to be embarrassed,” he said. “We both know that economists make no specifically useful contributions to such decisions. But this was a fine moment for the principal parties.

“Think is unlike some companies whose announcements have been widely publicized. They actually produce a product. That was not a fantasy or even a prototype that local citizens drove last week. It seems the Think City will be the first electric car produced in America in this century. With its 100-mile range, the City should have a strong market among economy/environmentally minded commuters.”

“But, at $30,000, it might be priced too high,” I said.

“That’s hard to assess,” he said, “It’s in the neighborhood of the expected price for General Motors’ Volt, which does not offer even half the City’s range. But look at the bigger picture. Think will buy its batteries from EnerDel, which is in Indiana already. They will need other parts from other suppliers. That’s opportunity for Indiana automotive suppliers to get in this electric-car market at ground level.”

“True, very true,” I said.

“But Elkhart County,” he said, “needs to rethink itself. This, and most other projects in the county, did not originate locally. This investment is from somewhere else, using ideas and talents from elsewhere. Here is a county that puffs itself up as the recreational-vehicle capital of the nation, with lots of talk about its ‘entrepreneurial’ record. Thus far, however, local entrepreneurs and the RV industry are largely missing from the picture.”  

“I don’t understand,” I admitted. “What do you want?”

“I,” he laughed. “I don’t want anything. I merely find these scraps of truth instructive. Maybe Elkhart County needs to ask itself if there is long-term economic value in being the RV or even the electric-vehicle capital of the nation. Would more extensive diversification be more advantageous? As for its entrepreneurial nature, is that an accurate and meaningful claim?”

“With questions like that,” I said, “I see why communities aren’t calling you.”•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT