Overseas rules change could pave way for Simon deals

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New rules proposed for real estate investment trusts in the United Kingdom could help Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc. as it seeks to expand its shopping mall dominance outside the United States.

The changes would loosen restrictions on ownership and stock-exchange listings, allowing for the creation of up to 40 new REITs, Bloomberg reported. Properties or companies in the UK would be eligible for REIT status even if their owners' shares trade on overseas exchanges.

That could help pave the way for Simon to add to its holdings in the UK, a strategy it has been plotting for years, said Rich Moore, an analyst for RBC Capital Markets in Ohio.

"If there are changes that make it easier on REITs, that's a positive for Simon," Moore said Tuesday. "They're a big battleship with a lot of capacity to buy things. They're just waiting, biding their time."

Simon already owns a stake in Capital Shopping Centres Group and Capital & Countries Properties, two London-based firms that operated together as Liberty International prior to May 2010, according to Simon regulatory filings.

Simon controls less than 6 percent of each company's outstanding shares in order to avoid a tangle with British REIT regulations.

It's not the first time Simon has been "thwarted" by circumstances out of its control as it seeks to grow, Moore noted. Another recent example was Simon's unsuccessful attempt to acquire Chicago-based General Growth Properties out of bankruptcy.

The proposed changes in the UK “will allow more cross-border M&A activity,” Phil Nicklin, who heads Deloitte LLP’s unit focused on REITs, told Bloomberg. “Investment banks are already talking to me about this.”

REITs in the UK avoid corporation or capital gains taxes in return for paying investors 90 percent of the income generated by their property.

The new rules won’t allow the creation of private REITs, according to the UK Treasury. Closely held real estate companies can qualify for the tax exemptions if they seek to sell shares on a London exchange within three years.

Current rules require REITs to have 25 percent of their shares widely held by investors. Pension funds and life insurance companies may gain exemptions from the rule, the Treasury said, without being more specific.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing