IBJNews

Pacers, CIB still talking post-deadline

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Negotiations over who will pay Conseco Fieldhouse operating costs are continuing the day after the deadline set by the Indiana Pacers to have a deal in place.

Team officials wanted to know by June 30 whether the city's Capital Improvement Board will take over the $15 million in annual operating expenses at the venue. The CIB owns the arena, where the Pacers and Indiana Fever play.

The Pacers' current lease runs through 2019, but the team has an out clause after 10 years if it is losing money. Pacers Sports & Entertainment contends it has been in the red every year but one since moving into Conseco Fieldhouse and can no longer afford to pay to operate the facility. 

They remain hopeful a deal is imminent, though Pacers spokesman Greg Schenkel declined to put a timeframe on a potential agreement.

“Discussions are continuing,” he said, “and both sides are working very hard and remain optimistic that we will have a positive resolution soon.”

The Pacers have said they will begin seeking other alternatives if a deal was not inked by June 30.

The CIB, which owns and operates the city’s professional sports venues and the Indiana Convention Center, is grappling with its own financial problems. It began 2009 by staring at a projected $47 million deficit for this year. The agency has improved its finances by making $26 million in cuts, collecting an additional $11 million in tax revenue, and avoiding payment on $25.5 million in debt service reserve payments.

For its part, the city has maintained the June 30 deadline was not a date it necessarily had to abide by, said Robert Vane, spokesman for Mayor Greg Ballard.

“But I’ve never gotten any indication that the talks have been acrimonious,” he said. “They’ve always been constructive.”

A CIB-commissioned study concluded that the two basketball teams contribute an estimated $55 million a year to the Indianapolis economy.

Talks lately have shifted from a long-term lease with the Pacers to a three-year deal with the operating costs retroactive to the Pacers’ 2009-10 fiscal year.

City officials have said they might wait until the National Basketball Association and NBA Players Association work out a new collective-bargaining agreement before signing the Pacers to a long-term lease.
 
The collective bargaining agreement expires in June 2011, and the league’s owners and players union are just beginning negotiations. A players’ lockout is possible, which could be a sticking point in the talks with the city.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Facts
    The Pacers out clause comes with financial penalties, something that our CIB negotiators and the media seem to conviently forget.
  • No Way
    Why tie a public subsidy to performance? Why not let the Pacers pay their own way, whether they are good or bad.
  • Tie the Rent to Wins
    How about tying the amount the Pacers pay to the number of wins they record. More wins should translate to higher revenues and allow the Pacers to pay a smaller percent. A continued poor product on the floor and they pay the premium rent.....

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. City-County Councilor Angela Mansfield and Bob Lutz have a case of wishful thinking.

      They obviously don't really care about the cost.

      They should.

      Extending Federal Benefits to Same-Sex Couples Will Cost $898M, CBO Says

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/22/extending-federal-benefits-sex-couples-cost-m-cbo-says/

    2. Brett, be careful what you lie about, the truth always comes out.

      "IMS's George Honored: Tony George, Indianapolis Motor Speedway president and chief executive officer, received the inaugural Pioneering and Innovation Award at the Autosport Awards Dec. 5 in London for his leadership in the development of the Steel and Foam Energy Reduction (SAFER) Barrier. George received the award at the annual gala at the Grosvenor House on behalf of the creators of the SAFER Barrier from Prince Salman Bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the leader of the Bahrain International Grand Prix circuit. This is the fourth major award that has been presented to honor George and the SAFER Barrier development team. The SAFER Barrier also received the Louis Schwitzer Award, SEMA Motorsports Engineering Award and GM Racing Pioneer Award in 2002. The SAFER Barrier was installed in all four turns of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway a pioneer in safety for drivers, cars and tracks -- in time for the 86th Indianapolis 500 in 2002. It since has been installed at more than a dozen other tracks, and the latest iteration will be installed at the Speedway in the spring.(IMS PR), see more on my Indy Track News page.(12-7-2004)"

      As far as the cart safety team, I cannot find anything on its date of creation. The Delphi Safety team was created in 1996. For some reason there is not much info out there on defunct racing series.

    3. Great article Anthony. Glad IMS is finally being run like a business and not a personal check book to finance the "Vision".

      Things are looking up but 15 years of scorched earth won't be fixed overnight. Unfortunately the TV ratings are still poor and that won't change anytime soon with the brilliant 10 year contract signed under the former regime.

    4. Brett not sure why you wonder what he said in his quote. "''I would like to jump in a time machine, go back to 1995, and tell the owners and Tony George not to split,'' Franchitti said. ''As soon as my time machine is done, I know where I'm going.''"

      Pretty clear, he would love to go back and tell TG and the team owners not to split.

      I am not sure there is anyone who wanted the split, and I don't think there is anyone who would not like to go back and prevent the split. But, as has been discussed ad nauseum, without the split carts management by team owners would have run all of ow racing into bankruptcy. If cart had such a wonderful product, then losing IMS would not have forced it into bankruptcy. If NASCAR lost Daytona or Charlotte, it would not fail like cart did.

      Truth,

      So you predicted that cart would go into bankruptcy and cease to exist while Indycar would continue on? I missed that prediction.

    5. I want to live in a city that has a garage structure to be proud of for it's innovating design!

    ADVERTISEMENT