Pacers, CIB still talking post-deadline

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Negotiations over who will pay Conseco Fieldhouse operating costs are continuing the day after the deadline set by the Indiana Pacers to have a deal in place.

Team officials wanted to know by June 30 whether the city's Capital Improvement Board will take over the $15 million in annual operating expenses at the venue. The CIB owns the arena, where the Pacers and Indiana Fever play.

The Pacers' current lease runs through 2019, but the team has an out clause after 10 years if it is losing money. Pacers Sports & Entertainment contends it has been in the red every year but one since moving into Conseco Fieldhouse and can no longer afford to pay to operate the facility. 

They remain hopeful a deal is imminent, though Pacers spokesman Greg Schenkel declined to put a timeframe on a potential agreement.

“Discussions are continuing,” he said, “and both sides are working very hard and remain optimistic that we will have a positive resolution soon.”

The Pacers have said they will begin seeking other alternatives if a deal was not inked by June 30.

The CIB, which owns and operates the city’s professional sports venues and the Indiana Convention Center, is grappling with its own financial problems. It began 2009 by staring at a projected $47 million deficit for this year. The agency has improved its finances by making $26 million in cuts, collecting an additional $11 million in tax revenue, and avoiding payment on $25.5 million in debt service reserve payments.

For its part, the city has maintained the June 30 deadline was not a date it necessarily had to abide by, said Robert Vane, spokesman for Mayor Greg Ballard.

“But I’ve never gotten any indication that the talks have been acrimonious,” he said. “They’ve always been constructive.”

A CIB-commissioned study concluded that the two basketball teams contribute an estimated $55 million a year to the Indianapolis economy.

Talks lately have shifted from a long-term lease with the Pacers to a three-year deal with the operating costs retroactive to the Pacers’ 2009-10 fiscal year.

City officials have said they might wait until the National Basketball Association and NBA Players Association work out a new collective-bargaining agreement before signing the Pacers to a long-term lease.
The collective bargaining agreement expires in June 2011, and the league’s owners and players union are just beginning negotiations. A players’ lockout is possible, which could be a sticking point in the talks with the city.


  • Facts
    The Pacers out clause comes with financial penalties, something that our CIB negotiators and the media seem to conviently forget.
  • No Way
    Why tie a public subsidy to performance? Why not let the Pacers pay their own way, whether they are good or bad.
  • Tie the Rent to Wins
    How about tying the amount the Pacers pay to the number of wins they record. More wins should translate to higher revenues and allow the Pacers to pay a smaller percent. A continued poor product on the floor and they pay the premium rent.....

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.