IBJNews

Returning to run franchise, Bird hopes to take 'another step'

 IBJ Staff
June 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Larry Bird is returning to the Indiana Pacers as president of basketball operations, the team confirmed Wednesday afternoon.

Bird, 56, will replace Donnie Walsh, 72, who will become a consultant for the team, said Jim Morris, president of Pacers Sports & Entertainment.

The team formerly announced Bird’s return at a Thursday morning press conference. His first day will be July 1.

Bird’s return comes almost exactly a year after he resigned as the Pacers' president of basketball operations, citing health issues.

He said he was feeling much better after a year off, and he enjoyed watching the team he helped build go 49-32 in the regular season and advanced to within a game of the NBA Finals.

“We got a great team, I know the system,” Bird said Thursday morning at a news conference. “I know what we need here to fulfill our dreams. The team is going to be good, better than good. The ultimate goal is to win a championship.”

“There’s some work to be done," he added. "It’s good to be back. We are on the right track here. Hopefully we can move it forward it another step.”

The team said Bird will not be involved in Thursday night's NBA draft, in which the team has the 23rd and 53rd picks.

The NBA Hall-of-Famer coached the Pacers from 1997 to 2000. He returned as president of basketball operations in 2003. Last year, shortly before his resignation, he was named the NBA’s executive of the year.

Bird was instrumental in building the current roster of the Pacers, which advanced to the Eastern Conference finals this summer before losing a seven-game series to the eventual NBA champions, the Miami Heat.

In a statement, the Pacers said Bird committed to a multi-year deal.

Pacers owner Herb Simon said in the statement that the combination of Bird, Walsh and Kevin Pritchard, who will remain general manager, "will give us three of the best basketball minds in the business."

Simon said that when Bird left last summer he told him the door was open for him to return.

Bird said in the statement that “the year off gave me a chance to reflect, to rest, to take care of some health issues, and it re-charged me. Donnie and Kevin did a great job, and I will lean on both heavily as we move forward toward the goal of competing for a championship.”

Walsh was president of the Pacers from 1988 to 2008, when he left to assume a similar position with the New York Knicks. After three years in New York, Walsh returned last year when Bird stepped down.

“I met with Larry when he wanted to leave last year and I said I would do this until he was ready to come back,” Walsh said in the statement. “Well, he’s ready, and I couldn’t be happier"
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Great news!
    A good story...Bird comes back, and no one loses a job in the process...Walsh and Pritchard stay on. Go Pacers!
  • I'm so excited.
    I'm so excited. Larry is "Mr. Basketball". Welcome back from a long time fan.
  • Pleasant news
    Welcome back Larry. A class act if there ever was one.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT