IBJNews

Returning to run franchise, Bird hopes to take 'another step'

 IBJ Staff
June 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Larry Bird is returning to the Indiana Pacers as president of basketball operations, the team confirmed Wednesday afternoon.

Bird, 56, will replace Donnie Walsh, 72, who will become a consultant for the team, said Jim Morris, president of Pacers Sports & Entertainment.

The team formerly announced Bird’s return at a Thursday morning press conference. His first day will be July 1.

Bird’s return comes almost exactly a year after he resigned as the Pacers' president of basketball operations, citing health issues.

He said he was feeling much better after a year off, and he enjoyed watching the team he helped build go 49-32 in the regular season and advanced to within a game of the NBA Finals.

“We got a great team, I know the system,” Bird said Thursday morning at a news conference. “I know what we need here to fulfill our dreams. The team is going to be good, better than good. The ultimate goal is to win a championship.”

“There’s some work to be done," he added. "It’s good to be back. We are on the right track here. Hopefully we can move it forward it another step.”

The team said Bird will not be involved in Thursday night's NBA draft, in which the team has the 23rd and 53rd picks.

The NBA Hall-of-Famer coached the Pacers from 1997 to 2000. He returned as president of basketball operations in 2003. Last year, shortly before his resignation, he was named the NBA’s executive of the year.

Bird was instrumental in building the current roster of the Pacers, which advanced to the Eastern Conference finals this summer before losing a seven-game series to the eventual NBA champions, the Miami Heat.

In a statement, the Pacers said Bird committed to a multi-year deal.

Pacers owner Herb Simon said in the statement that the combination of Bird, Walsh and Kevin Pritchard, who will remain general manager, "will give us three of the best basketball minds in the business."

Simon said that when Bird left last summer he told him the door was open for him to return.

Bird said in the statement that “the year off gave me a chance to reflect, to rest, to take care of some health issues, and it re-charged me. Donnie and Kevin did a great job, and I will lean on both heavily as we move forward toward the goal of competing for a championship.”

Walsh was president of the Pacers from 1988 to 2008, when he left to assume a similar position with the New York Knicks. After three years in New York, Walsh returned last year when Bird stepped down.

“I met with Larry when he wanted to leave last year and I said I would do this until he was ready to come back,” Walsh said in the statement. “Well, he’s ready, and I couldn’t be happier"
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Great news!
    A good story...Bird comes back, and no one loses a job in the process...Walsh and Pritchard stay on. Go Pacers!
  • I'm so excited.
    I'm so excited. Larry is "Mr. Basketball". Welcome back from a long time fan.
  • Pleasant news
    Welcome back Larry. A class act if there ever was one.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT