IBJNews

Panel OKs plan to cut Indiana corporate tax rate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A proposed cut of more than 20 percent in the state's corporate income tax rate would improve Indiana's business climate without hurting the state budget, the leader of the Indiana Senate's tax committee said Wednesday.

The plan calls for reducing the corporate tax rate from 8.5 percent to 6.5 percent starting in July 2012. Originally, lawmakers proposed cutting the rate to 5 percent but decided on a smaller scale-back because other provisions in the bill would raise $67 million by ending a handful of tax credits and imposing a tax on some bonds, said Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Chairman Brandt Hershman, R-Lafayette.

"Our goal is to help make Indiana's business-tax climate friendly for job creation and retention while not impacting our overall budget," Hershman said.

His committee debated the plan Tuesday before sending the bill to the full Senate on a 8-2 vote.

Supporters of the proposal said Indiana's current corporate tax rate is among the nation's highest and discourages businesses from moving to the state.

Hershman's proposal includes an estimated $59.5 million annual revenue boost by starting to tax the interest on out-of-state bonds held by Indiana companies and residents and $7 million from the elimination of various tax credits.

The corporate income tax is projected to raise about $688 million — or just over 5 percent — of the state's $13.4 billion in revenue for the coming budget year.

Hershman said about 16,000 small to mid-sized companies based in Indiana would be helped most by the rate cut.

"This is not a bill that primarily helps the Walmarts of the world because they already have the ability to move income to other jurisdictions to limit their taxing structure," he said.

Mark Cahoon, a vice president of the Indiana Manufacturers Association, said the rate reduction to 6.5 percent was significant and would help removing a sticking point in attracting business investment while not cutting into state revenues.

"It is a very difficult balancing act," Cahoon said. "What exemptions, deductions or credits can be reduced or eliminated and not do any harm to the economy but then allows those funds to be used for rate reduction?"

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Face it
    Corporate tax rates aren't the reason companies don't want to be here. Keep passing stuff like the gay marriage ban and you'll make sure folks who want to attract progressive employees (i.e. anything future-oriented) will stay far away. Not to mention that flights here are impossible, there's no public transportation, and our school systems are just abysmal. Why not invest taxes in something that will actually make the state attractive? Too radical?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT