IBJNews

Panel OKs plan to cut Indiana corporate tax rate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A proposed cut of more than 20 percent in the state's corporate income tax rate would improve Indiana's business climate without hurting the state budget, the leader of the Indiana Senate's tax committee said Wednesday.

The plan calls for reducing the corporate tax rate from 8.5 percent to 6.5 percent starting in July 2012. Originally, lawmakers proposed cutting the rate to 5 percent but decided on a smaller scale-back because other provisions in the bill would raise $67 million by ending a handful of tax credits and imposing a tax on some bonds, said Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Chairman Brandt Hershman, R-Lafayette.

"Our goal is to help make Indiana's business-tax climate friendly for job creation and retention while not impacting our overall budget," Hershman said.

His committee debated the plan Tuesday before sending the bill to the full Senate on a 8-2 vote.

Supporters of the proposal said Indiana's current corporate tax rate is among the nation's highest and discourages businesses from moving to the state.

Hershman's proposal includes an estimated $59.5 million annual revenue boost by starting to tax the interest on out-of-state bonds held by Indiana companies and residents and $7 million from the elimination of various tax credits.

The corporate income tax is projected to raise about $688 million — or just over 5 percent — of the state's $13.4 billion in revenue for the coming budget year.

Hershman said about 16,000 small to mid-sized companies based in Indiana would be helped most by the rate cut.

"This is not a bill that primarily helps the Walmarts of the world because they already have the ability to move income to other jurisdictions to limit their taxing structure," he said.

Mark Cahoon, a vice president of the Indiana Manufacturers Association, said the rate reduction to 6.5 percent was significant and would help removing a sticking point in attracting business investment while not cutting into state revenues.

"It is a very difficult balancing act," Cahoon said. "What exemptions, deductions or credits can be reduced or eliminated and not do any harm to the economy but then allows those funds to be used for rate reduction?"


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Face it
    Corporate tax rates aren't the reason companies don't want to be here. Keep passing stuff like the gay marriage ban and you'll make sure folks who want to attract progressive employees (i.e. anything future-oriented) will stay far away. Not to mention that flights here are impossible, there's no public transportation, and our school systems are just abysmal. Why not invest taxes in something that will actually make the state attractive? Too radical?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. City-County Councilor Angela Mansfield and Bob Lutz have a case of wishful thinking.

    They obviously don't really care about the cost.

    They should.

    Extending Federal Benefits to Same-Sex Couples Will Cost $898M, CBO Says

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/22/extending-federal-benefits-sex-couples-cost-m-cbo-says/

  2. Brett, be careful what you lie about, the truth always comes out.

    "IMS's George Honored: Tony George, Indianapolis Motor Speedway president and chief executive officer, received the inaugural Pioneering and Innovation Award at the Autosport Awards Dec. 5 in London for his leadership in the development of the Steel and Foam Energy Reduction (SAFER) Barrier. George received the award at the annual gala at the Grosvenor House on behalf of the creators of the SAFER Barrier from Prince Salman Bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the leader of the Bahrain International Grand Prix circuit. This is the fourth major award that has been presented to honor George and the SAFER Barrier development team. The SAFER Barrier also received the Louis Schwitzer Award, SEMA Motorsports Engineering Award and GM Racing Pioneer Award in 2002. The SAFER Barrier was installed in all four turns of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway a pioneer in safety for drivers, cars and tracks -- in time for the 86th Indianapolis 500 in 2002. It since has been installed at more than a dozen other tracks, and the latest iteration will be installed at the Speedway in the spring.(IMS PR), see more on my Indy Track News page.(12-7-2004)"

    As far as the cart safety team, I cannot find anything on its date of creation. The Delphi Safety team was created in 1996. For some reason there is not much info out there on defunct racing series.

  3. Great article Anthony. Glad IMS is finally being run like a business and not a personal check book to finance the "Vision".

    Things are looking up but 15 years of scorched earth won't be fixed overnight. Unfortunately the TV ratings are still poor and that won't change anytime soon with the brilliant 10 year contract signed under the former regime.

  4. Brett not sure why you wonder what he said in his quote. "''I would like to jump in a time machine, go back to 1995, and tell the owners and Tony George not to split,'' Franchitti said. ''As soon as my time machine is done, I know where I'm going.''"

    Pretty clear, he would love to go back and tell TG and the team owners not to split.

    I am not sure there is anyone who wanted the split, and I don't think there is anyone who would not like to go back and prevent the split. But, as has been discussed ad nauseum, without the split carts management by team owners would have run all of ow racing into bankruptcy. If cart had such a wonderful product, then losing IMS would not have forced it into bankruptcy. If NASCAR lost Daytona or Charlotte, it would not fail like cart did.

    Truth,

    So you predicted that cart would go into bankruptcy and cease to exist while Indycar would continue on? I missed that prediction.

  5. I want to live in a city that has a garage structure to be proud of for it's innovating design!

ADVERTISEMENT