Panel questions cuts to Indiana recycling programs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Legislators and recycling advocates asked the state environmental chief Wednesday why millions of dollars had been shifted out of recycling programs since the recession, saying the initiatives could have created thousands of jobs.

Sen. Mark Stoops, D-Bloomington, noted that $20 million in funds that lawmakers intended to promote recycling had been reverted to the state in recent years, and an $8 million balance was currently going unused.

"It seems like there's an awful lot we could have been doing over that period of time with $20 million," Stoops said at the meeting of the state environmental advisory council.

State environmental Commissioner Tom Easterly said much of the funding for recycling programs was suspended during the 2008 recession, when Indiana, like other states, cut spending to offset lost revenue. He also said several programs had become ineffective.

"We can collect all the recyclables we want, but if we don't have someone to buy them, it doesn't make any difference," Easterly said.

But Carey Hamilton, executive director of the Indiana Recycling Coalition, said by not spending more on recycling, the state was squandering the opportunity to attract at least 20,000 jobs that could come not only from recycling services, but also industries that rely on recycled materials.

"There's a real opportunity here, an economic opportunity," Hamilton said.

Of the six million tons of trash Indiana residents throw away each year, 92 percent can be recycled, Hamilton said, and 77 manufacturers in the state use recycled materials.

Alcoa spokeswoman Sally Rideout Lambert told the panel much of the aluminum the worldwide corporation uses comes from recycled cans and similar sources.

Indiana, Lambert said, uses 2.2 billion aluminum cans every year, of which perhaps a quarter are recycled.

"So every year, Hoosiers are throwing $40 million in the landfill," she said.

State Sen. Jean Breaux, D-Indianapolis, said Gov. Mike Pence's administration had cut the $1.1 million legislators had approved to spend on the recycling programs this year to $500,000.

A spokeswoman for Pence did not return phone calls and emails seeking comment.


  • Twentieth Century?
    Really? Indiana in the Twentieth Century? Have you looked around, really looked around? Try Nineteenth Century at best. We've got a governor and a legislature that is mired in so-called puritanical morals that couldn't care less about moving us out of the Dark Ages...
  • Possible...
    Is it possible to have mandatory recycling, contract with a recycler to pick up the waste for free, and let them handle the rest?
  • typical
    Is there any wonder why Indiana is seen as a backward state? The 20th century is still alive and well here.
    • Indiana Recycling Programs
      As a Head Custodian at an Elementary in Hendricks County, I continue to look for funding to make our recycling efforts more sustainable. We currently recycle approximately 60% daily. This mainly is Milk cartons along with White paper. We could do another 30% with funds that would allow us to purchase a way to not only contain these items but to allow for funding to collect these items. I have been told thru our legislative team that there isn't money out there but it appears we do it's just not being used for recycling.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ