IBJNews

Parker resigning as state Democratic Party chairman

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dan Parker said Monday morning that he will step down as chairman of the Indiana Democratic Party after a seven-year tenure that included big political highs—including President Barack Obama’s 2008 victory in the state—but recent lows as well.

"It is time for a new leader to embrace our past successes and take up our future challenges,” he said In a letter to party leaders.

“I have worked each day to make our state party more inclusive and diverse, more open, more efificent and more successful at the ballot box,” Parker wrote. “We have achieved many of the goals we set out to achieve.”

The Indiana Democratic Party’s central committee will choose Parker’s successor at a meeting Dec. 17. The party’s presumptive nominee for governor—former Indiana House Speaker John Gregg of Sandborn—is expected to be influential in that decision.

Parker leaves a party that just three years ago was celebrating the election of Obama, who had become the first Democrat to win Indiana’s electoral votes in 40 years.

But in that same election, Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels easily won a second term over Democrat Jill Long Thompson. And two years later, Republicans won a big majority in the Indiana House and extended their control of the Indiana Senate to a quorum-proof margin.

That gave Republican lawmakers the power to draw legislative and Congressional district maps that will impact elections for the next 10 years.

Parker has a long list of political credentials. He led the 1996 and 1998 Indiana House Democratic campaigns that resulted in legislative majorities in both years.

He coordinated former Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson’s successful ground campaign in 1999 and served as former Sen. Evan Bayh’s state director for three years. He also served as executive director of the Indiana Democratic Party before becoming its chairman in 2004.

At the time, Parker said in his letter, “the future looked bleak, if not impossible.”

“We’d just lost control of the governor’s office for the first time in 16 years and Republicans were determined to make sure we stayed in the wilderness for as long as they had been,” Parker wrote. “We proved them wrong.”

Two years later, Parker oversaw the election of three new Democrats to the U.S. House and helped Democrats keep the majority in the Indiana House. And the following year he committed resources to local races that allowed Democrats to control a record 68 out of 119 mayoral offices across Indiana.

Then in 2008, Obama became the first Democrat to win in Indiana since Lyndon Johnson did so in 1964.

But there were also big losses. Daniels won reelection in 2008 and then Republicans had big wins in 2010 and again this year, when the GOP won a majority of Indiana mayoral offices, typically a Democratic stronghold.

Still, Parker said in his letter he believes the party is well-positioned for success, with a professional staff, modernized business operations, strong voter files and donor lists.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Desertion
    The rats are starting to desert ship on O'Bama prior to huge Democratic losses in 2012 elections.
  • Signature
    Are we sure it's his signature on the letter?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT