IBJOpinion

Patachou should respect community

November 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Letters To The Editor

At 49th and Pennsylvania, Café Patachou seeks to expand, open a new pizzeria, and use much of the public sidewalk for proposed outside seating. Its brand manager recently clarified the extent of seating proposed in the code-variances petition, which includes a total of 12 variances from the code standards. Total seating would increase from the present 59 to 166 (more if outdoor seating for the pizzeria is included). This would create major parking and other problems for the neighborhood.

The remodeling, re-leasing, and re-branding of the long-successful retail center, which is an investment by Asset Partners LLC, should not be allowed to exacerbate parking problems, take over our public right-of-way and sidewalk, and obstruct the crucial clear-sight triangle at the busy neighborhood intersection. Yet this is what the aggressive Patachou plan would do.

The Patachou brand has developed substantial buzz and a loyal customer following due to appealing menus, skillful marketing and its several recent restaurant additions. Successful as its commercial brand might be, the company does not occupy the civic high ground in the eyes of many neighborhood residents. The company has generally ignored or dismissed the concerns of the many neighbors who would be most heavily impacted and who also question the safety risks. The neighbors asked the developer and Patachou to conduct a traffic and parking study, but this was refused, thus causing the neighbors to bear the expense of commissioning a professional impact analysis.

Places of social gathering are sometimes called “third houses” and are a socially beneficial and popular part of community. Pub, café and restaurant seating on public sidewalks has been readily authorized by city officials for the past 15 years or so. Unfortunately, these right-of-way encroachments have been approved almost as a matter of right, and inadequate space is often left for pedestrian passage.

As David Bollier advises in his book “Brand Name Bullies,” each request for enclosure of the public commons “must be supported by a strong case for exclusive use.” In this case, good planning and engineering practice recommend against outdoor seating, especially in the clear-sight triangle at the intersection, thus creating safety hazards. Also, the sought-after outdoor seating would cause substantial and unnecessary parking problems.

Patachou has extensive brand management, marketing and PR expertise, and many loyal customers. As a result, company officials seem resolute. But the neighborhood would be greatly diminished unless the developer and Patachou agree to scale back their impactful site plan. All neighbors desire a successful commercial center, but there are limits to what the corner can accommodate.

__________

Clarke Kahlo


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. City-County Councilor Angela Mansfield and Bob Lutz have a case of wishful thinking.

    They obviously don't really care about the cost.

    They should.

    Extending Federal Benefits to Same-Sex Couples Will Cost $898M, CBO Says

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/22/extending-federal-benefits-sex-couples-cost-m-cbo-says/

  2. Brett, be careful what you lie about, the truth always comes out.

    "IMS's George Honored: Tony George, Indianapolis Motor Speedway president and chief executive officer, received the inaugural Pioneering and Innovation Award at the Autosport Awards Dec. 5 in London for his leadership in the development of the Steel and Foam Energy Reduction (SAFER) Barrier. George received the award at the annual gala at the Grosvenor House on behalf of the creators of the SAFER Barrier from Prince Salman Bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the leader of the Bahrain International Grand Prix circuit. This is the fourth major award that has been presented to honor George and the SAFER Barrier development team. The SAFER Barrier also received the Louis Schwitzer Award, SEMA Motorsports Engineering Award and GM Racing Pioneer Award in 2002. The SAFER Barrier was installed in all four turns of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway a pioneer in safety for drivers, cars and tracks -- in time for the 86th Indianapolis 500 in 2002. It since has been installed at more than a dozen other tracks, and the latest iteration will be installed at the Speedway in the spring.(IMS PR), see more on my Indy Track News page.(12-7-2004)"

    As far as the cart safety team, I cannot find anything on its date of creation. The Delphi Safety team was created in 1996. For some reason there is not much info out there on defunct racing series.

  3. Great article Anthony. Glad IMS is finally being run like a business and not a personal check book to finance the "Vision".

    Things are looking up but 15 years of scorched earth won't be fixed overnight. Unfortunately the TV ratings are still poor and that won't change anytime soon with the brilliant 10 year contract signed under the former regime.

  4. Brett not sure why you wonder what he said in his quote. "''I would like to jump in a time machine, go back to 1995, and tell the owners and Tony George not to split,'' Franchitti said. ''As soon as my time machine is done, I know where I'm going.''"

    Pretty clear, he would love to go back and tell TG and the team owners not to split.

    I am not sure there is anyone who wanted the split, and I don't think there is anyone who would not like to go back and prevent the split. But, as has been discussed ad nauseum, without the split carts management by team owners would have run all of ow racing into bankruptcy. If cart had such a wonderful product, then losing IMS would not have forced it into bankruptcy. If NASCAR lost Daytona or Charlotte, it would not fail like cart did.

    Truth,

    So you predicted that cart would go into bankruptcy and cease to exist while Indycar would continue on? I missed that prediction.

  5. I want to live in a city that has a garage structure to be proud of for it's innovating design!

ADVERTISEMENT