IBJOpinion

Patachou should respect community

November 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Letters To The Editor

At 49th and Pennsylvania, Café Patachou seeks to expand, open a new pizzeria, and use much of the public sidewalk for proposed outside seating. Its brand manager recently clarified the extent of seating proposed in the code-variances petition, which includes a total of 12 variances from the code standards. Total seating would increase from the present 59 to 166 (more if outdoor seating for the pizzeria is included). This would create major parking and other problems for the neighborhood.

The remodeling, re-leasing, and re-branding of the long-successful retail center, which is an investment by Asset Partners LLC, should not be allowed to exacerbate parking problems, take over our public right-of-way and sidewalk, and obstruct the crucial clear-sight triangle at the busy neighborhood intersection. Yet this is what the aggressive Patachou plan would do.

The Patachou brand has developed substantial buzz and a loyal customer following due to appealing menus, skillful marketing and its several recent restaurant additions. Successful as its commercial brand might be, the company does not occupy the civic high ground in the eyes of many neighborhood residents. The company has generally ignored or dismissed the concerns of the many neighbors who would be most heavily impacted and who also question the safety risks. The neighbors asked the developer and Patachou to conduct a traffic and parking study, but this was refused, thus causing the neighbors to bear the expense of commissioning a professional impact analysis.

Places of social gathering are sometimes called “third houses” and are a socially beneficial and popular part of community. Pub, café and restaurant seating on public sidewalks has been readily authorized by city officials for the past 15 years or so. Unfortunately, these right-of-way encroachments have been approved almost as a matter of right, and inadequate space is often left for pedestrian passage.

As David Bollier advises in his book “Brand Name Bullies,” each request for enclosure of the public commons “must be supported by a strong case for exclusive use.” In this case, good planning and engineering practice recommend against outdoor seating, especially in the clear-sight triangle at the intersection, thus creating safety hazards. Also, the sought-after outdoor seating would cause substantial and unnecessary parking problems.

Patachou has extensive brand management, marketing and PR expertise, and many loyal customers. As a result, company officials seem resolute. But the neighborhood would be greatly diminished unless the developer and Patachou agree to scale back their impactful site plan. All neighbors desire a successful commercial center, but there are limits to what the corner can accommodate.

__________

Clarke Kahlo

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Saw the Indy Men's Chorus "Music of Gilbert & Sullivan" at the Indiana Historical Society on Sunday evening.

  2. Temporary workers are not "tools" they are people and companies that keep large amounts of temp staff are cheating.

  3. I miss having them around. I hope one of their stores is in the general Meridian/86th Street area. I will make good use of it.

  4. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  5. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

ADVERTISEMENT