Patachou should respect community

November 21, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

At 49th and Pennsylvania, Café Patachou seeks to expand, open a new pizzeria, and use much of the public sidewalk for proposed outside seating. Its brand manager recently clarified the extent of seating proposed in the code-variances petition, which includes a total of 12 variances from the code standards. Total seating would increase from the present 59 to 166 (more if outdoor seating for the pizzeria is included). This would create major parking and other problems for the neighborhood.

The remodeling, re-leasing, and re-branding of the long-successful retail center, which is an investment by Asset Partners LLC, should not be allowed to exacerbate parking problems, take over our public right-of-way and sidewalk, and obstruct the crucial clear-sight triangle at the busy neighborhood intersection. Yet this is what the aggressive Patachou plan would do.

The Patachou brand has developed substantial buzz and a loyal customer following due to appealing menus, skillful marketing and its several recent restaurant additions. Successful as its commercial brand might be, the company does not occupy the civic high ground in the eyes of many neighborhood residents. The company has generally ignored or dismissed the concerns of the many neighbors who would be most heavily impacted and who also question the safety risks. The neighbors asked the developer and Patachou to conduct a traffic and parking study, but this was refused, thus causing the neighbors to bear the expense of commissioning a professional impact analysis.

Places of social gathering are sometimes called “third houses” and are a socially beneficial and popular part of community. Pub, café and restaurant seating on public sidewalks has been readily authorized by city officials for the past 15 years or so. Unfortunately, these right-of-way encroachments have been approved almost as a matter of right, and inadequate space is often left for pedestrian passage.

As David Bollier advises in his book “Brand Name Bullies,” each request for enclosure of the public commons “must be supported by a strong case for exclusive use.” In this case, good planning and engineering practice recommend against outdoor seating, especially in the clear-sight triangle at the intersection, thus creating safety hazards. Also, the sought-after outdoor seating would cause substantial and unnecessary parking problems.

Patachou has extensive brand management, marketing and PR expertise, and many loyal customers. As a result, company officials seem resolute. But the neighborhood would be greatly diminished unless the developer and Patachou agree to scale back their impactful site plan. All neighbors desire a successful commercial center, but there are limits to what the corner can accommodate.


Clarke Kahlo


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.