IBJNews

Pence seeks review to simplify Indiana tax code

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mike Pence said Tuesday he wants to review Indiana's tax code to simplify it and promote economic development.

"This is not about raising taxes or cutting taxes," Pence said during a summit he called to examine possible tax changes. "This is about trying to look at a way we can reform the tax code and lessen the burden of compliance on Hoosiers and Hoosier businesses and create a more attractive environment for investment in Indiana through tax simplification."

Lawmakers have been cutting taxes fairly routinely in recent years, but a report from the conservative Tax Foundation found that that the average tax burden for Indiana residents grew between 2001 and 2011, in large part because of declining incomes. Lawmakers capped property taxes in 2008, but they also increased the state sales tax by a percentage point, from 6 percent to 7 percent.

Like much of his governing, Pence is starting off with a broad idea and leaving things largely open-ended. The summit, organized by Office of Management and Budget Director Chris Atkins, culled general ideas for tax reform from a mix of national conservative leaders and state and local tax experts.

Anti-tax activist Grover Norquist said no tax-code overhaul should be used to hide tax increases. Meanwhile, Jim Eads, former head of the national Federation of Tax Administrators, told attendees that comprehensive tax reform is often talked about but seldom achieved.

Arthur Laffer, an economist and an economic adviser to former President Ronald Reagan, discussed tax reform and the elimination of income taxes.

He conducted a study on 11 states that previously did not have income taxes but then enacted them.

“Every single one of those 11 states, no exception, has declined in their share of the overall U.S. economy,” he said.

Laffer said state and local officials can only manage to pass income tax rate increases when they promise the money will be used for schools and public services, such as police and fire, with 50 percent to 55 percent being spent on education. In nine of the 11 states in the study, public services actually declined, he said.

He also added that economic growth is the only way for the country – let alone the state – to get rid of income inequality.

Democratic lawmakers and staff attended the daylong event but were not included on any of the panels. House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, continued a longstanding criticism of Pence and the state's Republican leaders.

"Notably absent from these proceedings is anyone representing working people or working families trying to get into the middle class," Pelath said in a prepared statement. "Looking at the roster of participants, I'm not sure anyone should be surprised that the middle class has been left out. It's far better for them to lecture others than to get out into neighborhoods and communities to see the impact of their policies."

Despite the supermajorities that Republicans hold in both the House and Senate, Pence has had limited success pushing tax cuts through the General Assembly. His proposal to cut the state's income tax by 10 percent was cut in half and spread out over two years. Legislative Republicans paired it with their own preferred cuts, including the elimination of the state's inheritance tax. And Pence's call earlier this year to eliminate the state's tax on business equipment was dialed back sharply amid opposition from local leaders.

But the governor is laying the groundwork early for any effort to push legislation through the 2015 meeting of the Indiana General Assembly. Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, a key budget leader Pence has tangled with in previous sessions, led a discussion at the summit that considered expanding the state's sales tax to services.

Kenley, R-Noblesville, and John Mikesell, a public finance professor at Indiana University, discussed the political ramifications of attempting to tax services, an ever-growing sector of the economy. Kenley cited the political fallout from Florida's attempt to expand its state sales tax.

"It's going to take some effort to prepare the thing that will be acceptable to the public at large, because generally the public is suspicious of tax-type activities. The minute they see something that didn't appear to be running smoothly, well, that's cause to stop the whole exercise," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Rates aren't a problem
    Hopefully the results of his simplification plan do just that and simplify the tax code. Research shows that small business owners aren't concerned with how much they pay in taxes, but are concerned with the ease of filing the taxes (Florida, 2014). Reference: Florida, Richard. (2014) Tax Rates Aren't What Small Business Owners Say They Really Care About. CityLab. Retrieved from http://www.citylab.com/work/2014/06/tax-rates-arent-what-small-business-owners-say-they-really-care-about/372650/
  • Missing research
    "He also added that economic growth is the only way for the country – let alone the state – to get rid of income inequality." Yet economic growth has shown to only increase income inequality. Indiana median income has been on a downward trajectory for more than a decade now, even during years or relatively low unemployment.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT