IBJNews

Pence signs Indiana preschool, road-money bills

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence spent Thursday touting two of his top priorities—new money for preschools and roads—at ceremonial bill signings across the state.

Pence opened his day at the DayStar Childcare Ministry in Indianapolis, where he signed into law a preschool pilot program for low-income children. Surrounded by young children from the program and a bipartisan group of lawmakers, Pence rattled down a list of many supporters who helped push the plan into law.

He ended with praise for the broad generosity of Indiana residents.

"Thank you to the generations in Indiana for believing that we ought to be a people that don't suffer the little ones to come unto us. All who have cherished for so many years, for such is the kingdom of heaven," Pence said, paraphrasing the Bible. "It is to the heart and the compassion of the people of Indiana that this day truly belongs."

The program is a sliver of what the governor asked for when he opened the legislative session earlier this year, but marked a turn from just last month, when it appeared fiscal concerns could push lawmakers to study the issue for another year instead of taking action.

The preschool pilot would pay for children in five counties to attend early learning programs. Up to $15 million would be used in the first year -- with $10 million coming in budget cuts from the Family and Social Services Administration and $5 million being raised through private matching funds. The FSSA will determine which five counties are picked for the test run.

Pence later drove to Valparaiso, where he signed the measure releasing up to $400 million from a transportation trust fund established just last year for major road projects. Half the $400 million will be released to the Department of Transportation immediately to pay for major roads expansions and the other half will be held pending a review of the state's finances this December by the State Budget Committee.

In both cases, Pence walked away with more than it appeared he may get coming out of final negotiations during the 2014 session. To that end, he extensively thanked the General Assembly's leaders, including those gathered with him at the Indianapolis child care facility.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley urged the Pence administration to stick by its promise to spend the money on major road upgrades, including proposed additional lanes for Interstates 65, 69 and 70.

"It's important that we focus on supporting major improvements to major infrastructure across Indiana. This will ensure our communities get the resources they need in a way that's fiscally responsible and beneficial to our state as a whole," said Kenley, R-Noblesville.

Kenley stood as the clearest obstacle to Pence's agenda throughout the session. Kenley, who keeps a close eye on budget numbers and tax collections, suggested regularly that issues including the preschool program should be studied first before lawmakers committed to any programs.

The state has struggled recently through a new downturn in both actual tax collections and anticipated tax collections. Lawmakers will not meet until next year to craft their next biennial budget.

Pence had until midnight Thursday to decide what to do with the final batch of bills to reach his desk. If Pence does not sign or veto a bill, it automatically becomes law.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lol
    I like how Pence makes it seem like he's looking out for "the little ones" - by taking $10 million from Family and Social Services. Then asks for $400 million for some highways.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT