Pence stands by school-grading system

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence said Wednesday he is standing by Indiana's system of assigning "A-F" grades to schools based on their performance despite reports that the state's former schools chief worked to change the grading formula to ensure a top GOP donor's school received an "A."

Pence told The Journal Gazette on Wednesday that the system is "an essential part" of accountability measures designed to improve education in Indiana. But he said the public must have confidence that the system is "fair and impartial."

"I think the A-to-F system is extremely important," Pence said after participating in a mile-long walk to promote health with his wife, Karen. "Parents have a right to know how their schools are performing overall. But that system needs to really reflect the performance of those schools in an accurate and fair and impartial way."

Emails obtained by The Associated Press show Bennett and his staff scrambled last fall to change the grading formula so Christel House Academy, a charter school founded by Christel DeHaan, received an "A." DeHaan has donated $2.8 million to Republicans since 1998, including $130,000 to Bennett.

Bennett had touted the school as a top performer for months as he built support for his education agenda among lawmakers and business groups. But low 10th grade algebra scores pulled the school's initial mark down to a "C."

"This will be a HUGE problem for us," Bennett wrote in a Sept. 12 email to his chief of staff. "They need to understand that anything less than an A for Christel House compromises all of our accountability work."

The emails show efforts to raise the grade, including changing color presentations on a chart so a high "B'' looked like an "A," and included questions about whether the state could legally change just Christel House's score.

It's not clear how the formula was changed, but within a week, Christel House had gone from a 2.9 to a 3.75.

Bennett, who now is reworking Florida's grading system as that state's education commissioner, denies that Christel House Academy received special treatment and says other schools also benefited. He said discovering that the charter would receive a low grade raised broader concerns with grades for other "combined" schools — those that included multiple grade levels — across the state.

DeHaan has told The Associated Press no one from the school was involved in any discussions about its grade.


  • In my bugs bunny voice
    What an em-bare-@$$-ment, what an em-bess-le, what a maroon as a governor!!! I think he is in over his head and pay grade. Wasn't this guy a radio personality before getting into politics? Well I guess this shows how backwards we hicks are in this state but hey I'm not from here I just live here.
  • Clueless
    Dear governor Dence/Dunce, the world is no longer flat but if you want to continue with that philosophy as well you will only continue to show that you are clueless and Indiana needs a law to repeal elections. Using a system that is shown to be flawed and that can be rigged or changed shows that education in the state of Indiana needs to taken out of the hands of those that do not know what to do to make sure our children get what they need to their future. I thought your wife would have helped you in this but obviously not. By the way, please remember that Glenda ritz received more votes than you in the last election and those same people that put her in can vote you out. It is obvious we didn't like the path Tony was going if we resoundingly removed him.
  • Pencereship
    More Pencereship. It is a BAD system, not fair or impartial. lol. smh. Just have a system that reports the schools score to a 3rd party, then everything is just a number and it would be fair. They don't want this stuff to be fair, they want it stacked in THEIR favor.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.