Pence taps Bush, Daniels advisers to shape policy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The team of policy advisers assembled by Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Pence reflects his efforts to assuage social and religious conservatives who have built him into a national brand while catering to business-minded conservatives who have ruled under outgoing Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels.

The group includes Ryan Streeter, a former domestic policy adviser to President George W. Bush who helped define "compassionate conservatism," a pair of former senior aides to Daniels and the former counsel to Indiana's Family and Social Services Administration.

A list of 14 advisers and their areas of focus obtained by The Associated Press shows Pence is reaching deep into Indianapolis legal circles as he prepares to roll out specifics of his campaign platform this weekend at the GOP's state convention. Each adviser leads one or more policy groups for Pence.

Pence, who is widely known for his conservative views and federal efforts to defund Planned Parenthood, must walk a delicate line. He has to win over conservative voters who just ousted longtime Sen. Richard Lugar in the May primary because he was too moderate without alienating the fiscal conservatives aligned behind Daniels.

Pence has sidestepped social issues for the most part, saying he is focused on job creation. But two of his policy groups focus on issues near and dear to the conservative movement's heart: federalism and family policy.

Asheesh Agarwal, a member of the Federalist Society, a loose-knit network of conservative lawyers nationwide that advocates broadly for decentralizing power, is running the federalism and judiciary panels. He said Pence's first order to him was to "focus like a laser beam on economic development."

Agarwal has worked as legal counsel on Daniels' campaign and Daniels' outside fundraising group, Aiming Higher PAC. He and other Pence policy advisers declined to discuss specific policies Pence is considering ahead of his speech at this weekend's convention. But he said the federalism panel has been broadly looking at ways to decouple the state from the federal government and cited the battle against the federal health care overhaul as a good model for understanding the group's focus.

The family policy group is being run by Streeter, who in a 1999 op-ed for The Washington Times defended Bush's "compassionate conservatism" and calls to invest in religious charities, which ultimately became one of the hallmarks of the Bush administration. He said he was charged with seeing how family structures help or hurt Indiana's economy.

"It really is about economic conditions of Hoosier families," he said. "What is the relationship between healthy families and a healthy economy?"

Streeter said his group's work would probably manifest in Pence speaking throughout the state on the benefits of family structures.

That hasn't assuaged activists who are concerned Pence's vision of families may exclude many Indiana residents.

Mary Byrne, executive director of the Indiana Youth Group, which counsels gay teens, said it's hard to know exactly what Pence means by family policy but said it is unlikely to be friendly toward Indiana's gay community.

"I think they would come up with a very narrow view of families and that would be very scary," said Byrne, whose specialty license plates were revoked earlier this year at the urging of social conservatives in the state Legislature.

The narrow definition would not just be a problem for gay families but also for straight men and women who are either divorced or live together but are not married, she said.

"The mom and dad and two kids at home, with the mom staying home, that's just not a reality anymore," Byrne said.

Pence has said he generally would like to build on Daniels' last eight years in office, and his selection of two former Daniels aides reflects that. Former Daniels policy director Lawren Mills helped lead Daniels' overhaul of the state education system last year and is leading the education policy group. Former Daniels legislative director Mike O'Brien is leading the group focusing on transportation and infrastructure.

Pence himself has given a few hints of what he would do. His initial call to cut the state's personal and corporate income taxes along with eliminating the state inheritance tax carried an estimated price tag of $1 billion a year. Since he first floated the idea last summer, state lawmakers agreed to phase out the inheritance tax over the next 10 years. Pence has talked about cutting the state sales tax as well, but campaign spokeswoman Christy Denault says none of those proposed cuts are set in stone.

In the absence of specifics from Pence, his Democratic opponents have spent the past week campaigning throughout the state with what they call the "Pence Plan." Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Gregg and running mate Vi Simpson have said Pence's previous work for the Indiana Policy Review Foundation and public statements show he would likely limit women's access to health care and cut aid for low-wage workers.

Denault disputed the Democrats' statements, saying that Gregg and Simpson have wrongly attributed statements from other Indiana Policy Review authors to Pence.

The groups that have been shipping policy ideas up to Pence include more than 200 Hoosiers representing a broad swath of Indiana. Agarwal and Streeter both praised the process.

Many of Pence's advisers are lawyers and lobbyists from Indiana's most powerful law firms, which either do business with the state directly or represent business interests seeking state contracts and new laws.

Edwin Bender, executive director of FollowTheMoney.org, which tracks spending and influence in Statehouses, said that's not necessarily a problem because lobbyists often represent some of the most intimate knowledge of government because of the revolving door between government jobs and lobby shops.

But he said it's important that their interests aren't the only ones considered.

"When you can get people from very specific industries in and if they have very specific goals, then they're probably going to be able to work to get the answers they want, and that's not necessarily what is in the best interest of the public," he said.


  • 34th in median income
    would be more interesting to look at a number that factors in cost of living. Perhaps we don't need as much income as New York, Chicago, LA, etc to live well.
  • Seriously!

    That is hilarious. And, I couldn't agree with you more. :)
  • "ladyjan"

    After reading your message (twice, just to be sure I was reading it correctly...) I began thinking that YOU might be an ideal candidate for office on the Democratic ticket!
    • Vote Republican
      I know how the dems will fix that health funding and child poverty. Take a bunch of that "median" income from those working and GIVE it to those who don't work. (From each according to ability to each according to need - sounds like a recipe for a lot more need and a lot less ability)

      Maybe then we won't have as many jobs and, while we'll be earning more as we put the companies out of business (democratic labor unions - see Hostess for a great example), the democrats will be taxing us so high to pay for the entitlements that they continue to keep increasing that our net incomes will be much lower.

      Vote Republican!
    • Indiana is ranked 34th median household income
      If this is such a great place to do business then why are we ranked 34th in median income in Indiana...because the business owners are getting richer and the workers are getting poorer. Oh and we are 48th in public health funding and 43rd in child poverty. There are some stats to be proud of!

      • Indiana is 5th best!
        Just FYI, Indiana (Thanks in large part to Daniels) is ranked 5th in the Nations best states to do business in/with.
        • It's best for the state
          I just read an article in the Inside Edge Newsletter titled "The Best and Worst States for Business" It is based on a poll of 650 CEOs. The top 4 out of 5 of the top states are ran by Republican Governors and 4 out of the bottom (worst) 5 are ran by Democratic Governors.

          These CEOs and their decisions are what will CONTINUE to bring new jobs to this state.

          Please keep this in mind when you go to vote in Novemeber.

          VOTE PENCE!
        • Great Job Mitch!
          There is nothing that I hope for more than Pence to be like Mitch Daniels! Daniels has done many GREAT things for this state and we are just beginning to reap the benefits of his policies. PENCE GETS MY VOTE!
        • Oops!
          Good God! Turn out your wallets and dumb down your children!
        • Another Daniel
          If everything that he want done, this state would not exist. Daniel screw up this state and now Pence want to continue what Daniel started. He is getting all of these people and Bush and Daniel adviser to help him form what he want done. People wake up Pence in not a good candidate for governor.At least the Democrats is traveling around the state campaigning like it should be.

          Post a comment to this story

          We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
          You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
          Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
          No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
          We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

          Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

          Sponsored by

          facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
          Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
          Subscribe to IBJ
          1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

          2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

          3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

          4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

          5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.