IBJNews

Phase 10 inventor's lawsuit sets up high-stakes fight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
In the world of card games, Phase 10 is a whale. About 3 million copies of the rummy variation are sold each year, second only to Uno. The game has been the top seller for Plainfield-based Fundex Games Ltd. for years.

But now the 50-employee company has been dealt a wild card: The man who created Phase 10 in 1982, Michigan resident Kenneth Johnson, is suing to yank the firm's rights to make and market the game.

Johnson accuses Fundex of copyright infringement, trademark dilution, fraud, conversion and theft in the suit, which was filed in December in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis. Johnson claims the privately held company has withheld royalties, granted sub-licenses without his consent, failed to include Johnson's copyright notice on card games, and registered the Phase 10 mark for itself in the United Kingdom and France.

Fundex has not yet responded in court, but an attorney for the company said the allegations don't have merit.

"Fundex denies the claims and will vigorously defend its rights to Phase 10," said Mitchell Roth, an attorney with Chicago law firm Much Shelist PC.

Johnson's attorney, T. Joseph Wendt of locally based Barnes & Thornburg LLP, declined to comment. Johnson could not be reached for comment.

The principals of Fundex struck a deal for the game in 1986, paying Johnson a flat $60,000 and assigning him royalties on all future sales. The parties amended the agreement in 1996 and 2003, but the gist remained the same: Fundex had the right to market and sell Phase 10 and the first right to market new products related to the game, in exchange for royalty payments.

The lawsuit says Johnson discovered in the summer of 2008 that Fundex wasn't living up to its end of the deal. He spelled out his concerns in two letters to the company. And he notified Fundex of plans to review its records on Phase 10, as allowed in the contract, but when his auditors arrived a month later the company refused to provide the requested information.

So Johnson, who received a trademark for the game in 1994, told the company on Nov. 1 that he was canceling the deal. When Fundex continued to market and sell the game, he filed suit. The featured game on Fundex's Web site at press time was a board game called "Phase 10 Twist."

The dispute appears to have arisen at least in part over the company's push to repurpose and repackage the card game in multiple forms, including a mobile version.

Fundex in 2007 sold Canadian mobile-game publisher Magmic Games the rights to develop a downloadable version of Phase 10, to be sold to mobile phone customers for a one-time fee of $6.99. Fundex gets about $1 per download. The company would not disclose the terms of the deal.

Fundex is a small player in the $20 billion box-game industry. Rhode Island-based Hasbro Inc., controls 75 percent of the segment. California-based Mattel Inc. has about 10 percent, with a handful of other companies fighting over the rest.

Fundex gets about half of its roughly $20 million in revenue from licensed games, with the rest coming from company-created games or standbys like chess and checkers and other products, CEO Chip Voigt said.

Voigt, 48, declined to discuss the lawsuit or describe the importance of Phase 10 to the company's prospects. He founded the company with his father, Pete, who was involved in the development of Uno for Illinois-based International Games Inc. before it was acquired by Mattel in 1992. Pete Voigt is now retired.

Chip Voigt said the dispute is the first time Fundex has faced a legal action related to a game it licenses.

"In our industry, from time to time disputes arise," he said. "We're continuing on."

The suit does not specify how much in damages Johnson will seek, only that it will exceed $75,000. 
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT