Phone company lays off hundreds amid inquiry

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A subsidized phone service provider under scrutiny from Indiana regulators is laying off hundreds of salespeople across the country amid inquiries into its sales tactics.

Oklahoma City-based TerraCom Inc., which began operating in Indiana in June 2012, and affiliate YourTel America Inc. have started the process of cutting about 700 salespeople in TerraCom's 23-state service area, the company announced late last week. The process began July 1.

A company representative declined on Monday to release information about employees affected in Indiana.

The move was triggered by a Federal Communications Commission warning issued June 25, reminding providers of the discount phone service program Lifeline that they are liable for any conduct by salespeople that violated FCC rules.

TerraCom and YourTel America began the termination process and are "considering the best business path forward in light of the [FCC's] recent enforcement advisory," said Dale Schmick, chief operating officer of the two firms.

TerraCom and YourTel draw subsidies from the Lifeline program to provide cheap phone plans to low-income customers.

Lifeline provides discounts on basic monthly telephone service to qualifying low-income customers. Applicants must report household incomes at or below 135 percent of the federal poverty level ($32,000 for a family of four), or they need to qualify for food stamps, Medicaid or other federal welfare programs.

All phone customers pay an average of $2.50 per month to the Universal Service Fund, which funnels the money back to the phone providers to reimburse them for offering discounted service.

TerraCom receives $250,000 to $300,000 per month in Lifeline reimbursements for Indiana customers, the Universal Service Fund’s records indicate.

Federal and state regulators have been scrutinizing Lifeline to target waste and fraud.

TerraCom and YourTel America settled for $1 million in February with the Federal Communications Commission, after the FCC claimed they set up multiple Lifeline accounts for individual customers in Oklahoma.

As IBJ reported in May, Indiana utility regulators began asking questions soon after the settlement about how the phone company managed to sign up a massive 30,000 customers in its first six months of business in the state.

At an Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission conference on July 3, TerraCom's Schmick defended the company’s sales methods in Indiana, saying the company recruited so many customers because it has perfected its sales techniques.

Typically, TerraCom’s sales reps set up booths or tents at charity events to hand out marketing material and sign up customers, Schmick told commissioners. Commissioners questioned whether TerraCom was properly screening out all the unqualified applicants before filing the paperwork.

Schmick explained that he is required to sign legal documents for the reimbursements. He would face criminal fraud charges if he knowingly submitted an unqualified Lifeline application, he said.

The FCC issued an enforcement advisory on June 25 regarding the conduct of salespeople and the rules for signing up customers.

"The Enforcement Bureau ... is particularly concerned that some eligible telecommunications carriers are failing to ensure that their agents, contractors and representatives adhere to Lifeline rules," according to the advisory.

Among those regulations, companies must confirm an applicant’s eligibility before activating a Lifeline account, and applicants need to acknowledge that their households do not already have Lifeline accounts.

Companies face up to $1.5 million in fines each time they fail to comply.

In a prepared statement, Schmick said the layoffs beginning July 1 were intended “to ensure continued compliance while we transition to a new business model.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.