PILLIE: Don’t toss the reforms along with Bennett

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

PillieIn the modern political world, it seems the validity or importance of an idea is treated no more seriously than what brand of butter substitute you buy from the local grocery store. Most recently, Indiana has experienced this phenomenon in education policy.

A number of stories have been published recently based on emails sent during former Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett’s tenure, and current Superintendent Glenda Ritz has been busy pointing out the faults of her predecessor.

Looking at Ritz’s record, I’m not sure what she has actually accomplished outside of trying to roll back her predecessor’s policies or flat out discredit him.

Ritz used ISTEP delays to criticize the results of those tests, only to be assured by her own auditor that student performance wasn’t affected. In spite of improved student achievement, Ritz tried to make it easier for kids who can’t read to be promoted to fourth grade.

The only actual work on the education front she has delivered is a promise to provide greater transparency for the revised A-F grading system.

Her office doesn’t exactly have a stellar track record in this regard. At Hoosier Access, we documented how Ritz’s public access counselor lied to a citizen about the existence of a public information request from Associated Press reporter Tom LoBianco.

In those documents, she indicated there is no written request from LoBianco, which is required by law. When pressed on that point, her public access counselor “remembered” there is a written request and provided a month-long email exchange between the counselor and LoBianco.

Some Republicans feel too little has been done to defend Bennett, given all the work he put into delivering these education reforms. While they are entitled to their opinion, some actions of Bennett and his staff are quite frankly indefensible. There is absolutely no reason that political call lists, campaign donor lists or any political documents should be passed around a government office.

Speaking as someone who has worked in a public office, the inability of Bennett’s team to distinguish between politics and policy is disturbing. If the party were governed like any professional sports league, I’m certain some suspensions would be handed out. What’s really amazing is that, in spite of how politicized the office became, they still weren’t able to secure re-election.

Bottom line, we need to move past the personalities involved here. Improving Indiana’s education system is too critical to the future of our state’s work force.

In spite of some very flawed decisions by Bennett and his team, the validity of their reforms is supported by the results. We’ve seen significant increases in the pass/fail rate of the ISTEP tests as well as the four-year cohort graduation rate in public schools during the Bennett administration.

For all of the Bennett’s administration failings, it’s clear student performance improved during his tenure.

Our political discussions need to rise above this never-ending cycle of “he said, she said” attacks about how much or how little an office is politicized. There are too many challenges and too many flawed people to throw out their ideas because they make mistakes.

People attracted to politics share the same flaws we all must endure. Some rise above those flaws while others make mistakes as a consequence of them.

Instead of assessing these ideas based on who is putting them forward, let’s start looking at the ideas themselves. A few of them might just work.•


Pillie is managing editor of the conservative blog Hoosier Access and a former congressional aide in Washington, D.C., and Indiana. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.