A redistricting plan proposed Monday by Republicans who control the Legislature would shift several GOP-leaning areas into
the northern Indiana congressional district narrowly won last year by Democrat Joe Donnelly.
The congressional map puts all of Elkhart County and much of Kosciusko County into Donnelly's current district and removes
part of Democratic-leaning LaPorte County and all of Kokomo. The changes could make it more difficult for Donnelly to win
re-election. He narrowly defeated Republican Jackie Walorski last year, and she has already announced plans to run again in
2012.
The shift is just one included in maps the Senate Election Committee proposed for Indiana's nine congressional and 50
state Senate districts.
The congressional map also would extend what has been a swing district won last year by Republican Todd Young further north
to include all of heavily GOP Johnson County just south of Indianapolis. The 9th district starts in the Ohio River counties
near Louisville.
The proposal also would give southern Indiana's 8th district won last year by Republican Larry Bucshon more of the counties
along the Ohio River east of Evansville.
Senate President Pro Tem David Long R-Fort Wayne, said the proposed congressional districts are more compact and more representative
than those drawn by Democrats when they controlled redistricting in 2001.
Long said political considerations weren't as important as keeping counties together, and he expected the districts now
held by Donnelly, Bucshon and Young to remain competitive.
"We've tried our best to keep counties intact where we can," he said.
Nine of the state's 92 counties would be divided between two congressional districts under the Senate committee plan.
The other 83 would be single-district counties.
Sen. Tim Lanane, D-Anderson, criticized the changes proposed for Donnelly's and Young's districts.
"Clearly those are politically motivated lines there that have been moved," Lanane said. "This was something
that we feared might happen, particularly with Representative Donnelly's district."
Donnelly, who was elected last year to his third two-year term, has known significant changes to his district boundaries
were possible and has been considering whether to run for the U.S. Senate or governor.
The Senate Elections Committee is expected to vote Wednesday on advancing the proposed maps to the full Senate, where Republicans
hold a 37-13 majority. The House election committee was releasing their proposed state House districts later Monday.

















IBJ Conversations
7 Comments
Add Comment
There's nothing wrong with the electoral college. It is a necessary part of our republic, needed to protect the interests of smaller states from the mobs in big cities. Without it, our presidential candidates would only campaign in a few populous states. While I agree that gerrymandering needs to be addressed, districts need to be adjusted from time to time to take into account the shifts in population.
This Dem think that they own the district. Really is is the citizen's district. More accurately, those citizens who live in the district. How can this Dem state that it is Donnelly's district? This destructive mentality is prevalent in our corrupt political systems.
A grid pattern would work great if population densities would follow grid patterns. But population densities don't follow grid patterns and population densities change. If districts aren't re-drawn the value of individual voters votes becomes very unequal.
This procedure is perfectly natural and necessary.
This is a stupid procedure and districts should be standardized and constant. The ability to "chip" away at the votes of an opponent by counting them in the surrounding districts is morally reprehensible. We need to fight for a better system to better represent the actual makeup of our state, other states, and our country as a whole.