Plan to cut business-equipment tax draws debate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana House lawmakers took up a Senate proposal to cut business taxes on Monday, as fiscal leaders continued working behind the scenes to craft a compromise package of cuts this legislative session.

Members of the House Ways and Means Committee trudged through three hours of testimony from business leaders seeking further tax cuts, and school and local government officials looking to be spared further budget cuts.

The Senate plan would eliminate the state tax on business equipment for small business owners while also trimming back the corporate income tax from 6.5 percent to 4.9 percent—the second major cut across the board in recent years. House Republicans, including some who heard testimony Monday, drew up a different plan that would give county leaders the option of eliminating the state's business-equipment tax.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, hinted that he would like to see more of the House's approach—with the decision placed on local leaders—inside the Senate measure. Eliminating the tax would hit different counties in very different ways, he said.

"We have different transfers (of tax burdens) to other property taxpayers within those counties," Brown said. He said that was why the House Republican plan, House Bill 1001, "is a unique conversation to every county, so it therefore lends itself to better representation at the county level rather than us doing a blanket thing across the state."

Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, noted that the state's budget leaders are in routine talks behind the scenes at the Statehouse.

"We're in discussions—the governor's office, the Senate leadership, the other fiscal people, the House leadership and their fiscal leaders. We're all meeting weekly and talking and seeing if we can find common ground," he said.

The proposals are responses to Republican Gov. Mike Pence's call for the complete phase-out of the tax, but the governor has taken on a limited role in the debate, much as he has with other issues this legislative session. Pence repeatedly declined to say what he would like done with the proposals during a tense meeting with Statehouse reporters last week.

Pence and the Senate's author, Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Buck Creek, say the economic benefits could outweigh the losses if businesses start flocking to lower-taxed areas. They argue that the ending tax will keep Indiana competitive now that it's surrounded by states with lower or no equipment taxes.

But a report released last week from the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute, which studies state-level budget decisions, shows that the tax has little effect on a business' decision to move from one state to the next. And any benefits could take years to kick in.

Local leaders—who rely on the tax for $1 billion in support each year—have emerged as the sharpest critics of the proposal. Cities and schools, they say, would be left to cut services or raise other taxes to make up for the loss in the meantime.

Mayors and school lobbyists asked lawmakers to study the issue over the summer or find a way to replace any money that is cut from their budgets as a result. They say that property tax caps set in 2008 have effectively crippled their ability to provide basic services.

"Indiana's public schools can't take any more hits," Denny Costerison, Indiana Association of School Business Officials executive director, said during testimony. "We can't take any more losses."

Brown said how the committee will handle the two approaches is yet to be seen, but there's a chance a proposal to chop the research and development tax cut in half will be taken out of the bill.


  • Fiscal situation
    So the other day on radio they talked about how a lot of states these days are running surplusses, since they pretty much all have cut their services, and funding for schools. Indiana is looking to be the first to blow its "surplus" by cutting off its revenue, as opposed to doing something beneficial, like hiring teachers to teach our kids.
  • Logic alsways wins
    Use Logic not Tea Party platitudes.
  • Cut This Tax Completely
    If companies expand that creates jobs! Jobs create taxes! Jobs create shoppers! Empty plants turn into Concert Venues! Why place a tax on expansion?
  • LocaL Decision
    Do not believe leaving it up to local counties to keep tax is wise. Urban counties will need to keep the tax and there by accelerate the loss of business. Does anyone think that Indianapolis can loose any more tax base? If low taxes were the only consideration of business location or expansion Mississippi would be Silicon South. Indiana and the Midwest in general are growing too slow and moving up a few slots on tax ladder is a simple approach to the problem. Lets have an honest discussion of the requirements and needs to make Indiana location for business.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............