A bill aimed at requiring some Indiana welfare recipients to undergo drug testing failed to clear a legislative committee
Wednesday after concerns were raised about the possible $1 million cost for a state agency to start the program.
The state Senate's health committee tied 5-5 on the bill, stalling it for now. The bill earlier passed the House and
its sponsor said he'll look for a way to revive it later in the legislative session.
The bill proposed a three-county pilot program for testing those receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families funds.
It would require testing for recipients who agency officials have found reasonable suspicion of drug use and random testing
for other recipients, with a range of penalties up to loss of benefits.
The House approved the bill 81-15 last month after adding a provision pushed by Democrats requiring lawmakers to submit to
drug tests before receiving perks like parking spots and laptops. Democrats argued that Indiana's poor should not be the
lone targets of drug testing.
Opponents told the Senate committee they worried that too few drug treatment programs were available to help poor people
who might fail the tests and maintained that the testing policy would put a financial strain on the state's Family and
Social Services Agency.
"The benefits are clearly not worth the cost," said Lucinda Nord of the Indiana Coalition for Human Services.
The nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency estimates that starting the drug testing program would cost FSSA between $810,000
and $1.1 million in its first year and between about $145,000 and $340,000 in the second year.
Republican Rep. Jud McMillin of Brookville, the bill's sponsor, said the agency's ongoing costs wouldn't increase
much by expanding the testing program to all 92 of the state's counties, which is when the state would see greater savings
from not paying welfare benefits to drug users.
"After rolling it out to the remainder of the counties, I believe the savings that we see will be disproportionate to
the continuing costs," McMillin said.
Republican Sens. Beverly Gard of Greenfield and Vaneta Becker of Evansville joined the committee's three Democrats in
voting against the bill. Gard said she supported the drug testing concept, but believed the program's cost needed more
review.

















IBJ Conversations
25 Comments
Add Comment
We are a nation addicted to one drug: More of whatever it is we think we want!
If working people want to use drugs and still give 110% to their job and their employer is satisfied thatââ¬â¢s their business and I donââ¬â¢t care what they do as long as Iââ¬â¢m not paying for it. But when people sit just around on their nasty laurels all day because they are too strung out to get a job and canââ¬â¢t even take care of their own children and my tax dollars are expected to pay for itââ¬Â¦that is MY BUSINESS. Please, spend the MILLION or however much it takes as long as the government follows through, kicks them out of the system and forces them to take responsibility for their own bad choices. Make it their choice to sink or swim; do or dieââ¬Â¦and if they make the wrong choice itââ¬â¢s their problem, not the taxpayers'.
I believe we have a responsibility to help our fellow man, with the goal in mind to help them to be able to help themselves. But I donââ¬â¢t believe that we have any obligation to support parasites whose only objective in life is to take money (from a government supported by law-abiding, hard working citizens) that they didnââ¬â¢t earn and drink it, inject it, sniff it or suck it and never give anything back. I was always taught ââ¬Åyou make your bed, you lie in itââ¬Â and don't expect taxpayers to be responsible for your mess.
If I don't pass a drug test, I do not get hired. Consequently, I don't get paid.
You play (with drugs) we DON'T pay!
That includes everyone who gets a check regardless of whether it's a paycheck or assistance check.