IBJNews

Planned Parenthood says donors alone can't sustain clinics

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Donors from far and wide are sending money to Planned Parenthood of Indiana, but the organization doesn’t expect the giving to last.

“What we’ve seen in the last month is astonishing, and it can’t be sustained,” CEO Betty Cockrum said Thursday morning.

The outpouring is in response to a new Indiana law that says abortion providers can’t receive Medicaid reimbursement. That eliminates about $1.4 million, or 9 percent, of Planned Parenthood’s $15 million operating budget.

After receiving more than $100,000 in donations, Planned Parenthood said on Thursday it would continue providing services such as pap tests, sexually transmitted disease testing and birth control to Medicaid patients through June 15.

Planned Parenthood is hoping a federal judge will block the law. The organization doesn’t have a back-up plan because the Medicaid-funding picture is so complicated, spokeswoman Kate Shepherd said.

The impact on patients varies across Planned Parenthood’s 28 clinics. Midtown Indianapolis at 3750 N. Meridian St. sees the highest portion of Medicaid patients, at 24 percent.

At other clinics, such as Castleton and Richmond, the portion of Medicaid patients is less than 6 percent. Several locations serve a high portion of low-income patients, but they’re covered under federal grant programs, not Medicaid reimbursement.

Planned Parenthood performs abortions at four sites: Merrillville, Bloomington, Lafayette and in Indianapolis at 86th Street and Georgetown Road.

Existing federal law means that none of those clinics can use federal funds for their general operations. Medicaid-eligible patients may go to those clinics for abortions, but again, they can’t use federal money to pay for it.

Planned Parenthood performed 5,580 abortions in the 2010 fiscal year ended June 30. At a cost of $300 to $500 each, abortions generate roughly $2 million a year. (Planned Parenthood said it does does not track revenue specifically from abortions.)

This isn’t the first time in recent years that Planned Parenthood of Indiana has lost a source of government revenue. Six clinics closed in 2009 after Indiana privatized the administration of federal family-planning grants, and the contractor changed the rules for distributing money, Shepherd said.  

The clinic closings, plus more aggressive protester activity and the 2010 general election prompted core donors to step up their support, Cockrum said. Planned Parenthood’s main annual fundraising event, “a Gathering of Goddesses and Gods,” raised record amounts the past two years, she said.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, contributions and private-sector grants doubled to more than $2 million, or 13 percent, of revenue. That was the same share as government contracts and grants.

The spike in private support last year was the result of bequests from long-time supporters, Cockrum said. For the most part, she said annual fundraising efforts net a little more than $1 million a year.

“Our fundraising, year-to-year, is very consistent,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Straw man
    The law doesn't stop abortions. it doesn't stop Planned Parenthood from performing abortions. It only follows the letter of existing law that prevents Medicaid money from being spent on abortions. If a woman wants rid of her unborn child, she needs to either drop $300-$500 of her own coin to delete her problem, get her baby daddy to cough up, or PP finds a donor to pay the price for her. Just not tax money. Taxpayer funded abortions are all that are stopped by this.
  • No this is the other side of the story
    Steve and Betty, Who is going to take care of these kids that are born to parents who don't want them or can't afford to take care of them. Don't say they should have used birth control because now they can't get it because PP has shut down. The parents will end up keeping them and possibly abusing them. The state comes in and takes them away and puts them into foster care where they stay the rest of their lives possibly being abused again. I think it is pretty short sighted to tell a woman what she can and can't do with her body. And before anyone goes off about me being a liberal, I'm a registered Republican and I believe in smaller government so this would include keeping their hands of mine and anyone else's body. May have to vote democratic next time to counter this extreme swing to the right our legislature has made.
    • Bad typing
      \/ I meant "non-compliance."
    • Hmmm
      So, on the one hand, PP takes government money with the official strings attached that the funds can't be used for state-sponsored abortions. But then it goes on to whine that there's no way to separate the finances of non-abortion work from abortions, because it's "complicated?" Sounds like a simple case of non-compiance to me.
      • planned parenthood
        Abortions should've have never been allowed this is simple murder nothing else got it people..it not only ruins a person's mind but takes a life..
      • bravo
        Great news to hear! There are plenty of other clinics that have (or will) stepped up to help these medicaid patients. PP has committed enough atrocities and needs to be shut down.
      • One sided
        That was clearly a one sided report. Lets try and get a little balance in the IBJ and talk to those not so favorable to planned parenthood. They are far from being an altruistic provider of serves to the poor.
        • The unborn
          are the victims. It seems that these babies should be worth more than $300-$500 to Planned Parenthood's Bottom line. So sad.

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

        2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

        3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

        4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

        5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

        ADVERTISEMENT