Poll shows Lugar trailing Mourdock by double digits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new poll shows U.S. Sen. Richard G. Lugar may be in real danger of losing his longtime Senate seat.

Results released Friday morning by Howey Politics Indiana and DePauw University have Lugar trailing Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock by double digits, 48 percent to 38 percent, in the Indiana Republican Senate primary race.

The results are in stark contrast to the previous Howey/DePauw poll in late March that found 42 percent of likely Republican voters backing Lugar, compared with Mourdock’s 35 percent.

The latest survey was conducted by Republican pollster Christine Matthews of Bellwether Research and Democratic pollster Fred Yang of Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group, and included 700 mostly Republican voters. It has a margin of error of 3.7 percentage points.

Yang said a poll he conducted in January for the Indiana Democratic Party showed the first signs of trouble for Lugar, when 56 percent of those surveyed said they wouldn’t vote for Lugar in the primary.

“The findings of that poll made clear that Sen. Lugar was vulnerable to a single challenger in a Republican primary,” he said. “And that is exactly what has seemed to transpire.”

The race between Lugar and Mourdock, however, could come down to the wire, depending upon the accuracy of the various polls attempting to gauge the contest.

Lugar’s campaign on Thursday pointed to a poll by Lunch Pail Republicans, which showed him leading Mourdock 44 percent to 42 percent—virtually a dead heat given the poll’s 4.9-percentage-point margin of error.

Lugar is seeking his seventh term. But Mourdock's backers are casting the 80-year-old as too moderate for conservative-leaning Indiana and out of touch after 36 years in Washington, D.C.

Lugar won his last election in 2006 with 80 percent of the vote and no Democratic challenger.

The winner of Tuesday’s primary will face Democrat U.S. Rep. Joe Donnelly and Libertarian Andy Horning in the November general election.


  • Cutting Off your Nose...
    In the US Congress the most important thing is seniority. Senator Lugar has it; Senator Mourdock will not. If he's re-elected over and over again he can have the seniority that Lugar now has on behalf of Indiana in 2049.
    If he's returned Lugar might head the Agriculture Committee again next year. Mourdock? Maybe in 2030 or so?
    If the Republican win back the majority Sen. Lugar is likely to become the President pro tempore of the US Senate.
    Does Indiana want to return a powerhouse to the Senate or does she want to send a novice to sit maybe a dozen or so other freshman Senators?
  • H1B and Outsourcing
    What turned me off of Lugar was I sent him an e-mail months back asking what his position was on the H1B Visa program and his staff responded to my amazement. More amazing was the response said, "It is only 85,000 jobs a year." In a recession that an unexcusable answer. Sorry, China doesnt outsource jobs, nor does India. I am voting against Lugar. That is not representing me nor my fellow IT workers--nor their families!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.