IBJNews

Popular issues stall behind Indiana Dems' boycott

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Anti-smoking advocates are on the verge of success in the Indiana General Assembly but must wait out House Democrats' boycott of a divisive labor bill.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers in both the Senate and House is pushing to ban smoking in most public places and workplaces, including bars. The only exemptions it includes are the gambling floors of casinos and pari-mutuel betting parlors, private clubs and cigar and hookah bars.

The bipartisan group enjoyed an added push before the 2012 session when Gov. Mitch Daniels added it to his legislative agenda and House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said it should be written into law before the Feb. 5 Super Bowl in Indianapolis.

But House Democrats will have to return to work before that and many other popular measures can make it into law. Democrats continued their boycott Friday over a contentious labor bill being pushed by Republicans.

The Democrats' Statehouse walkout is hardly as dramatic as their five-week walkout last year when they successfully blocked the measure to ban unions from mandating that workers pay fees for representation. But the standoff between Republicans and Democrats in the House has still placed other popular issues in limbo.

Speaking at an anti-smoking press conference one day after the start of the 2012 session, Rep. Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, said he thought the smoking limits eventually would lead to fewer cases of lung cancer and heart disease. "If we can impact one person's life, then we've made a difference in this state," said Brown, a physician. "We can save the state money through raising our health awareness and our health status."

Meanwhile Democrats participating in the boycott of the right-to-work measure said they were optimistic the House would return to work next week. And timing is important during the legislature's brief, 10-week long session this year.

"This impasse will probably be over next week," said Rep. Charlie Brown, D-Gary, a veteran advocate of the smoking ban.

House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, appeared to flag Friday afternoon, saying "we know we can't stay out indefinitely." But he also gave no guarantees his caucus would end their boycott next week.

The tenuous nature of the House's legislative work occasionally showed itself during the three-day boycott through the start of the session.

Rep. Bruce Borders, who chairs the Veterans Affairs and Public Policy Committee, held a hearing on a measure that would extend military relief from one year to three years. By most accounts the measure would win almost unanimous bipartisan support in both the House and Senate.

But without a formal bill in front of them the lawmakers were unable to advance the measure to the next step in the legislative approval process. Thursday's committee vote amounted to "a straw vote," said Borders, R-Jasonville, although he added that taking another vote on the measure in his committee would not be terribly hard.

Rep. Charles Moseley, D-Portage, clarified during the hearing that they could not technically vote on the bill because it had not yet been formally introduced in the House. Speaking after the meeting, he said that benefits for military families would fly with ease through the House and Senate.

"But I also have an obligation to the people of my district to represent where they stand," Moseley said after the brief hearing Thursday morning. Moseley spent all three days with the majority of other Democrats in their boycott of the House.

The boycott also threw some question around the delivery of Gov. Mitch Daniels' State of the State speech, scheduled for Tuesday night. As of Thursday, House Republican Caucus lawyers were still researching whether a quorum needed to be achieved in order for him to give his annual assessment to a joint session of the House and Senate, said Bosma spokeswoman Tory Flynn.

"Gov. Daniels will be at the House Chamber to deliver his speech Tuesday at 7 p.m.," said Jane Jankowski, Daniels' spokeswoman.

Bauer did not say exactly whether House Democrats would be in the chamber for the speech or whether they would watch it somewhere else. "We'll be there, somehow, some way," he said, somewhat mysteriously.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bauer gets paid twice with State tax dollars ?
    Does Bauer throw hissy fits at his day job at Ivy Tech when he disagrees with decisions the administration makes there? Or is he gone enough from his Ivy Tech job already? Does he get paid a full salary at Ivy Tech even though he's gone for months during the legislative session -- even when he's in Illinois leading a Democratic walkout? Aren't Ivy Tech employees paid with state tax dollars?
  • Make careful note
    fellow Hoosiers, of which legislators believe that less than 10% of the people of Indiana have the right to dictate to the rest of us. That's what this Right to Work law addresses. Remember it well come November.
  • Really:"
    The Dem's have had over a year to inform the public. For those who call it 'ramming through legislation' that's got to the the biggest slow motion ram ever! Get to work! The minority is the minority for a reason. They should not have the power to muck up the whole process. What a bunch of sore losers.
  • Tea THIS
    How would I like something rammed down my throat? How about Illegal immigrants taking American jobs who get a free pass to be here? How about me being fined if I do not take the mandatory government insurance plan? How about my tax money going to ghetto dwelling thugs who have made a career out of staying on welfare? The list goes on ad infinitum. Stick that in your liberal left winged tea cup and guzzle it all! You socialist communist.
  • Rammed down throat
    Really, you're asking Republicans if they would like legislation rammed down their throats? Have you even been on this planet and seen what the Democratic President did last year?
    And if you say you need more time to take your case to the people of Indiana, what have the house Democrat done in the last year to find these things out? I’ll tell you; Nothing! They can’t go out and take polls, surveys or even tell the people this issue is going to come to a vote because they know the outcome. The people do not want to have to pay a union or mob or any other entity to work at a job unless they are in agreement with the movement of that union or mob. Simple.
    Sorry, your argument just does not hold up.
  • Unionized Dems
    I find it funny that unions in Indiana account for only 10% of the workforce.
    Does that mean the Dems think 10% of their people are more important than the other 90% who voted?
    Unions are more important than veterans and their families?
    Unions are more important than the smoking ban?
    Unions are the ONLY thing important to them in this session?
    In case you don't know, when they win an election, they represent ALL the people, not their supporters ONLY.
  • rebuttle
    In your opinion, but nine is different. The Democrats would be there if the stupid Republican and tea party would not push stuff though the legislator. Why are they in a hurry to pass the Right to Work bill. No input from the public, no discussion either. The Republican says our way or no way (tea Party). So I don't blame the Democrats for staying out. Asked yourself an question. Would you like something ram down your throat?
    • Bauer & the Demos
      Bauer and the Demos know that their leader, Obama, is four and out and will lead the Demos to huge defeats not only in Congress but also in the state legislature. So, they are throwing their hissy fit in hopes that the Repubs. won't be able to pass anything, even that to which the Demos. agree. It is unfortunate that the political process has been taken over by the corrupt Chicago-like politicians such as Obama whom Bauer and the Demos. hold in high regard.
      • The State is Caught
        Our State Legislature is caught between a rock and hard place when it comes to a smoking ban. From one-hand they will potentially lose cigarette tax dollars, and from the other hand they will lose Medicaid Dollars used when taking care of citizens with lung ailments in later life. It is a quality of life issue for those who run the gauntlet of cigarette smoke to get their coffee at the convenient store, to the tax payers complaining about entitlement costs. I am surprised that no one considered doubling the price on cigarettes, and using the money raised for Medicaid Payments.
      • right to work@smoking ban
        It should be any and every business owners right to decide whether or not they allow smoking----Not the governor. What will he take away next--the right to PRAY. VOTE NO ON EVERY BILL THE GOVERNOR WANTS-where you can shop,what you can buy-how much your child weighs-ect.
      • Smoking ban- hypocritic?
        How is it that smoking bans are made into laws, when:
        1)I never hear any mention about the wall of cigarettes in every convenient store that NO ONE can ignore, even small kids?
        Lawmakers will ban smoking but won't touch banning the selling or mega advertisement (which of course isn't on TV) that is hard to miss when getting my Speedy cup of coffee.
        Oh, it's the money from the taxes.
        Seems hypocritical to say: "We will ban you from smoking it, but please buy a pack- or two because we want your tax money" Can you make that CIGS ON SALE bigger please?

        And, 2ndly, why not in gambling casinos?
        Because lawmakers have the only 'legal' gambling?, and need that money too.

        I think it borderlines illegal somehow to approve measures like that. How can they ban s moking from all these businesses except those that make them money?

        It's a farse. I think any lawmaker who votes for antismoking should have the nerve to also vote that this also goes for gambling casino floors, and remove all cigarettes from sight (just like they are supposed to with porn material).

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

        2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

        3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

          My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

        4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

          Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

        5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

          My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

          It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

          Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

          The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

        ADVERTISEMENT