Anti-smoking advocates are on the verge of success in the Indiana General Assembly but must wait out House Democrats'
boycott of a divisive labor bill.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers in both the Senate and House is pushing to ban smoking in most public places and workplaces,
including bars. The only exemptions it includes are the gambling floors of casinos and pari-mutuel betting parlors, private
clubs and cigar and hookah bars.
The bipartisan group enjoyed an added push before the 2012 session when Gov. Mitch Daniels added it to his legislative agenda
and House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said it should be written into law before the Feb. 5 Super Bowl in Indianapolis.
But House Democrats will have to return to work before that and many other popular measures can make it into law. Democrats
continued their boycott Friday over a contentious labor bill being pushed by Republicans.
The Democrats' Statehouse walkout is hardly as dramatic as their five-week walkout last year when they successfully blocked
the measure to ban unions from mandating that workers pay fees for representation. But the standoff between Republicans and
Democrats in the House has still placed other popular issues in limbo.
Speaking at an anti-smoking press conference one day after the start of the 2012 session, Rep. Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville,
said he thought the smoking limits eventually would lead to fewer cases of lung cancer and heart disease. "If we can
impact one person's life, then we've made a difference in this state," said Brown, a physician. "We can
save the state money through raising our health awareness and our health status."
Meanwhile Democrats participating in the boycott of the right-to-work measure said they were optimistic the House would return
to work next week. And timing is important during the legislature's brief, 10-week long session this year.
"This impasse will probably be over next week," said Rep. Charlie Brown, D-Gary, a veteran advocate of the smoking
ban.
House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, appeared to flag Friday afternoon, saying "we know we can't stay
out indefinitely." But he also gave no guarantees his caucus would end their boycott next week.
The tenuous nature of the House's legislative work occasionally showed itself during the three-day boycott through the
start of the session.
Rep. Bruce Borders, who chairs the Veterans Affairs and Public Policy Committee, held a hearing on a measure that would extend
military relief from one year to three years. By most accounts the measure would win almost unanimous bipartisan support in
both the House and Senate.
But without a formal bill in front of them the lawmakers were unable to advance the measure to the next step in the legislative
approval process. Thursday's committee vote amounted to "a straw vote," said Borders, R-Jasonville, although
he added that taking another vote on the measure in his committee would not be terribly hard.
Rep. Charles Moseley, D-Portage, clarified during the hearing that they could not technically vote on the bill because it
had not yet been formally introduced in the House. Speaking after the meeting, he said that benefits for military families
would fly with ease through the House and Senate.
"But I also have an obligation to the people of my district to represent where they stand," Moseley said after
the brief hearing Thursday morning. Moseley spent all three days with the majority of other Democrats in their boycott of
the House.
The boycott also threw some question around the delivery of Gov. Mitch Daniels' State of the State speech, scheduled
for Tuesday night. As of Thursday, House Republican Caucus lawyers were still researching whether a quorum needed to be achieved
in order for him to give his annual assessment to a joint session of the House and Senate, said Bosma spokeswoman Tory Flynn.
"Gov. Daniels will be at the House Chamber to deliver his speech Tuesday at 7 p.m.," said Jane Jankowski, Daniels'
spokeswoman.
Bauer did not say exactly whether House Democrats would be in the chamber for the speech or whether they would watch it somewhere
else. "We'll be there, somehow, some way," he said, somewhat mysteriously.

















IBJ Conversations
11 Comments
Add Comment
And if you say you need more time to take your case to the people of Indiana, what have the house Democrat done in the last year to find these things out? Iâll tell you; Nothing! They canât go out and take polls, surveys or even tell the people this issue is going to come to a vote because they know the outcome. The people do not want to have to pay a union or mob or any other entity to work at a job unless they are in agreement with the movement of that union or mob. Simple.
Sorry, your argument just does not hold up.
Does that mean the Dems think 10% of their people are more important than the other 90% who voted?
Unions are more important than veterans and their families?
Unions are more important than the smoking ban?
Unions are the ONLY thing important to them in this session?
In case you don't know, when they win an election, they represent ALL the people, not their supporters ONLY.
1)I never hear any mention about the wall of cigarettes in every convenient store that NO ONE can ignore, even small kids?
Lawmakers will ban smoking but won't touch banning the selling or mega advertisement (which of course isn't on TV) that is hard to miss when getting my Speedy cup of coffee.
Oh, it's the money from the taxes.
Seems hypocritical to say: "We will ban you from smoking it, but please buy a pack- or two because we want your tax money" Can you make that CIGS ON SALE bigger please?
And, 2ndly, why not in gambling casinos?
Because lawmakers have the only 'legal' gambling?, and need that money too.
I think it borderlines illegal somehow to approve measures like that. How can they ban s moking from all these businesses except those that make them money?
It's a farse. I think any lawmaker who votes for antismoking should have the nerve to also vote that this also goes for gambling casino floors, and remove all cigarettes from sight (just like they are supposed to with porn material).