IBJNews

Potential of higher car rental taxes drawing fire

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

People who come to Indianapolis for business, ball games or other reasons could pay more for their visits if local officials decide to raise taxes on car rentals and professional sports tickets early next year.

A package that state legislators passed in 2009 to bail out the agency that operates the city's stadiums and convention center allows the City-County Council to increase the taxes, but it must act during the first two months of 2013.

If the council does act, taxes on car rentals could rise from 15 percent to 17 percent and the admissions tax on Colts and Pacers tickets could increase from 6 percent to 10 percent, The Indianapolis Star reported.

The idea is drawing the ire of the local hospitality industry, which for years has complained about creeping tax rates on hotel rooms, rental cars and meals that they say burden their customers and make Indianapolis one of the highest-taxed U.S. cities for visitors.

The Indianapolis Colts and car rental agencies in particular say they're opposed to any increases.

"It would annoy customers more, especially when you factor in that ... we have to include all taxes and pricing" in Internet quotes, said Charlie Mullen, co-owner of Indianapolis-based chain ACE Rent a Car. "So it drives up the pricing of the car. It's just getting outrageous."

The city's NFL franchise doesn't want its fans to have to pay any more, either.

"It would be unfair to our ticket holders, particularly in these economic times, to be hit with an additional tax on the tickets — and not just for us, but for all the events" at CIB venues, said Dan Emerson, the Colts' vice president and general counsel. "It would be sending the wrong message."

A spokesman for the Pacers said the NBA team had no comment.

The proposal is part of ongoing budget talks between the council and Mayor Greg Ballard that also could include a new agreement with the Pacers.

Ballard said most visitors don't focus on taxes. "For the average customer who comes downtown for a convention, they ask what the overall cost of the experience is," he said. "And there's no disputing that this downtown is built up largely on visitor taxes."

The Capital Improvement Board estimates the full tax increases would bring in $6.9 million a year. The board's operating budget for next year is $63.9 million. Before the General Assembly approved the bailout in 2009, the board's cash reserves had dropped to $26 million.

The 15-percent car rental tax rate contributed to Indianapolis being ranked No. 8 on the Global Business Travel Association's list of the worst 10 cities for travel taxes in 2012. The group also considered Indianapolis' 9-percent tax on food and beverages and its 17-percent tax on hotels.

John Livengood, president of the Indiana Hotel and Lodging Association and the Indiana Restaurant Association, said he's more concerned about the car rental tax than the sports tax. It makes sense for fans who use sports facilities to help support the agency that operates them, he said.

But a higher car rental tax "would discourage people from coming to Indianapolis and spending money," he said. "That tax, like the hotel tax, is a disincentive for people to come here."

But despite the city's high travel taxes, Indianapolis hasn't been hurting for tourism.

A study released last week by Visit Indy estimated the economic impact of the tourism industry increased 10 percent last year to $3.95 million. An estimated 22 million visitors came to Indy, most of them for leisure activities.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • "the experience" - lolz
    We the People are the enableers of the Powers who are spending like drunken sailors. "Tax the outsiders" compliments well the already pervasive local xenophobia.
  • CIB
    Customers will either go along with the higher taxes or they won't. If they choose not to and it damages the local economy, the short-sighted leaders at the CIB will need to find a scapegoat. Taking responsibility for their own ineptitude is not part of that organization's culture.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT