Potential of higher car rental taxes drawing fire

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

People who come to Indianapolis for business, ball games or other reasons could pay more for their visits if local officials decide to raise taxes on car rentals and professional sports tickets early next year.

A package that state legislators passed in 2009 to bail out the agency that operates the city's stadiums and convention center allows the City-County Council to increase the taxes, but it must act during the first two months of 2013.

If the council does act, taxes on car rentals could rise from 15 percent to 17 percent and the admissions tax on Colts and Pacers tickets could increase from 6 percent to 10 percent, The Indianapolis Star reported.

The idea is drawing the ire of the local hospitality industry, which for years has complained about creeping tax rates on hotel rooms, rental cars and meals that they say burden their customers and make Indianapolis one of the highest-taxed U.S. cities for visitors.

The Indianapolis Colts and car rental agencies in particular say they're opposed to any increases.

"It would annoy customers more, especially when you factor in that ... we have to include all taxes and pricing" in Internet quotes, said Charlie Mullen, co-owner of Indianapolis-based chain ACE Rent a Car. "So it drives up the pricing of the car. It's just getting outrageous."

The city's NFL franchise doesn't want its fans to have to pay any more, either.

"It would be unfair to our ticket holders, particularly in these economic times, to be hit with an additional tax on the tickets — and not just for us, but for all the events" at CIB venues, said Dan Emerson, the Colts' vice president and general counsel. "It would be sending the wrong message."

A spokesman for the Pacers said the NBA team had no comment.

The proposal is part of ongoing budget talks between the council and Mayor Greg Ballard that also could include a new agreement with the Pacers.

Ballard said most visitors don't focus on taxes. "For the average customer who comes downtown for a convention, they ask what the overall cost of the experience is," he said. "And there's no disputing that this downtown is built up largely on visitor taxes."

The Capital Improvement Board estimates the full tax increases would bring in $6.9 million a year. The board's operating budget for next year is $63.9 million. Before the General Assembly approved the bailout in 2009, the board's cash reserves had dropped to $26 million.

The 15-percent car rental tax rate contributed to Indianapolis being ranked No. 8 on the Global Business Travel Association's list of the worst 10 cities for travel taxes in 2012. The group also considered Indianapolis' 9-percent tax on food and beverages and its 17-percent tax on hotels.

John Livengood, president of the Indiana Hotel and Lodging Association and the Indiana Restaurant Association, said he's more concerned about the car rental tax than the sports tax. It makes sense for fans who use sports facilities to help support the agency that operates them, he said.

But a higher car rental tax "would discourage people from coming to Indianapolis and spending money," he said. "That tax, like the hotel tax, is a disincentive for people to come here."

But despite the city's high travel taxes, Indianapolis hasn't been hurting for tourism.

A study released last week by Visit Indy estimated the economic impact of the tourism industry increased 10 percent last year to $3.95 million. An estimated 22 million visitors came to Indy, most of them for leisure activities.


  • "the experience" - lolz
    We the People are the enableers of the Powers who are spending like drunken sailors. "Tax the outsiders" compliments well the already pervasive local xenophobia.
  • CIB
    Customers will either go along with the higher taxes or they won't. If they choose not to and it damages the local economy, the short-sighted leaders at the CIB will need to find a scapegoat. Taking responsibility for their own ineptitude is not part of that organization's culture.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.