CIB to consider 1-year extension with Pacers, source says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Capital Improvement Board of Marion County is expected to seek a one-year extension of its current lease deal with Pacers Sports & Entertainment, according to a former board member and current Indianapolis city-county councilor.

The existing deal pays the Pacers $33.5 million over three years.

Council Minority Leader Michael McQuillen, a Republican, said he expects CIB members will begin considering the extension Monday afternoon so the city and CIB will have more time to sort out a long-term financial arrangement with the Pacers.

“The city’s just in such a fiscal hard time right now,” McQuillen said. “With a little more time, the city will be able to figure their shortfalls. The CIB needs to be part of that conversation, too.”

The nine-member board meets at 3 p.m., but CIB officials declined to elaborate on a meeting agenda item labeled “Pacers update.”

“There could be a discussion in general about our relationship with the Pacers moving forward,” CIB spokesman Robert Vane said.

Vane declined to say whether members will be asked to vote on a new agreement, but he said it’s possible.

“The discussion over that agenda item will dictate whether any action is taken,” he said Monday morning.

In a July 2010 contract, CIB agreed to give the Pacers $33.5 million over three basketball seasons to offset losses from operating Bankers Life Fieldhouse. The money was granted in a forgivable loan, with the balance diminishing each year the Pacers play at the fieldhouse and reaching zero in 2019.

CIB has allotted money to continue supporting the Pacers, but is also under pressure to cut expenses from the city, which faces budget shortfalls into 2014. CIB is a municipal corporation that manages the fieldhouse, Lucas Oil Stadium and the Indiana Convention Center. It collects local food-and-beverage, car-rental and ticket taxes.

The City-County Council included a $15 million payment-in-lieu-of-taxes, or PILOT, in CIB’s budget for 2013 to support the city’s rainy day fund and replace retiring police officers and firefighters.

CIB is fighting that payment, but it also wants the Democrat-controlled council’s approval to raise car-rental and ticket taxes in 2013.

Council President Maggie Lewis, who sits on the CIB board, could not be reached for comment Monday morning.

“This is not a party issue," Lewis said in late November. "All the councilors understand the financial benefits of having professional sports teams in this city. It’s just a matter of what we can afford and what our other priorities are.”

McQuillen, who was the council’s CIB representative before Democrats took control, said he wasn’t sure how much a one-year extension on the current agreement would cost.

An extension would also give CIB more time to look at the Pacers’ finances. The team will see more revenue from the NBA under a new league agreement.

According to Forbes, the team has lost money each of the last six years. The last two full seasons, the Pacers lost a combined $32.6 million, Forbes estimated. During the strike-shortened 2011-2012 season, the Pacers lost $10.5 million.

League sources have told IBJ the Pacers could come close to breaking even on basketball operations under the new NBA agreement.


  • Just Say No
    This is nuts. Why are we opening discussions with the Pacers about giving them a better deal when it is the Colts deal that broke the self sustaining business model for the CIB? The Pacers just have Colts envy with both teams disregarding poor local government finances and asking more from a Mayor who appears to be negotiating for the sports teams, not the injured taxpayers. The CIB solution is a Payment in Lu of Taxes (PILOT) from these teams to offset taxpayer police and infrastructure costs like the non profit hospitals.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).