IBJNews

Preferred-shareholders group may thwart buyout of Emmis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. Chairman Jeff Smulyan’s effort to take the media company private could be derailed by a band of preferred stockholders who oppose the plan.

Smulyan-Jeff-mugSmulyan

Texas investor Geoffrey Raynor and eight other preferred shareholders have promised to vote against changes to the company’s articles of incorporation that Smulyan would need to complete his $2.40-a-share buyout.

Emmis has scheduled an Aug. 3 shareholder meeting to garner approvals required to move forward with the deal, which values the Indianapolis broadcasting and publishing firm at $90 million.

But Smulyan, 63, doesn’t appear to have the votes required to change the articles of incorporation. The amendments would need the OK of holders of two-thirds of the preferred shares. The dissident group owns 34 percent, according to Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Raynor and other members of the dissident group did not return calls, and an Emmis spokeswoman declined to comment, citing SEC rules.

Emmis shares have swooned this month, as doubt among investors grew over whether Smulyan, Emmis’ chairman and CEO, would be successful in his bid to take the company private. Shares now fetch around $2, 17 percent less than his offer.

Industry observers say opponents apparently are holding out for a better deal.

Under Smulyan’s offer, holders of preferred stock would convert those shares into bonds. They would receive just 60 cents in bonds for every $1 in preferred stock. But the bonds would pay a hefty 12-percent interest rate. That’s nearly double the rate Emmis was paying on its preferred stock before it decided to suspend payments in late 2008 because of financial struggles.

Smulyan this spring lined up a financial backer—Alden Global Capital of New York—to fund the purchase. It would buy $97 million of a new class of preferred stock, and would receive warrants to buy common shares at a nominal price.

Though Alden officials couldn’t be reached for comment, industry observers speculate the private equity firm might walk away if it appears opposition will delay the deal too long.

“A financer of a deal like this won’t let the offer linger very long,” said Robert Unmacht, principal of IN3 Partners Inc., a Nashville, Tenn.-based media and investment banking consultancy. “This market is still somewhat unstable so I’m sure [Smulyan] and his financer will want to get this tied off.”

The dissident holders of preferred stock also appear to have the clout to block the deal by refusing to exchange their shares for the 12-percent bonds. The deal requires holders of at least two-thirds of the preferred shares to agree to the swap.

The preferred shareholders aren’t the only Emmis investors causing Smulyan headaches. Holders of common stock also are challenging the transaction in court, though a Marion County judge on July 27 denied a request for a temporary injunction.

Smulyan’s proposal also requires approval from the holders of a majority of Emmis shares, a threshold Smulyan likely would be able to meet. Alden already is a major shareholder, and Emmis executives who plan to roll over their stakes also would be expected to vote yes.

The wrangling is unlikely to pay off in a big way for opponents of the deal, said Mark Foster, chief investment officer of Kirr Marbach & Co. in Columbus, Ind.

“At this point, I’m not sure what these people want,” Foster said. “Many of these investors have ridden the stock down from $25 or more per share. What are they holding out for now? Twenty or 30 cents?”

This is not Smulyan’s first attempt to take the company private.

Smulyan made an offer in May 2006 to acquire all the company’s stock for $15.25 per share in a deal that valued the company at $567 million. He called off the deal a few months later after he couldn’t reach terms with the board.

Not long after that, the bottom fell out of the radio-advertising market, sending Emmis stock in a downward spiral.

Smulyan’s offer is about an 84-percent discount to the previous offer. Since that offer, however, the prospects for the radio industry have dimmed substantially. The company also issued a $4-a-share cash dividend that pushed down its stock price.

The radio industry has been besieged by a changing media landscape, with satellite radio, expanding cable television and the iPod eating into its audience share.

“The Emmis investors have fought this fight, they’ve stood on their principles,” Foster said. “Everyone has taken a bath over this. At some point, you’d think they’d cut bait and move on.”

Emmis Industry analysts think if Emmis goes private it can use cash flow to pay down debt. (IBJ File Photo)

One thing that Foster said has kept investors in opposition of Smulyan’s privatization plans are the high-profile stations Emmis owns in markets such as Los Angeles, New York and Chicago.

“The stockholders continue to think they’re owed more because Emmis has this beachfront property,” Foster said. “But what the stockholders have missed is the same thing that Smulyan himself was slow to recognize. The industry has changed, and those stations aren’t worth what they used to be.”

Unmacht thinks Emmis would perform better as a private company.

“As a private firm, they can take a slower growth strategy, and use their cash flow to pay down debt,” Unmacht said. “Wall Street simply doesn’t reward companies that throw off a lot of cash and don’t grow the top line.”

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Emmis owns 23 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in seven cities. It also operates radio stations in Slovakia and Bulgaria.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bonds PIK
    I believe the bonds to be issued to preferred holders are PIK and that likely means the 12% interest is paid as additional bonds and not cash. Usually, PIK means Payment In Kind, in this case similar to a common stock dividend paid as more stock and not cash. The only way to get cash would be to sell the bonds, but because they never mature they likely would have very little cash value, but the bond holder might have to pay income tax on the PIK payment! If this is correct then it is a very poor deal for the preferred holders.
  • Buyout of Emmis dead?
    Can Emmis renogotiate the terms with the preferred shareholders and get board approval before tomorrow's meeting of the shareholders? Otherwisw the deal won't go thru--

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT